Wetting behavior of dental implants

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1256-1266

  Rupp, Frank ^a   Scheideler, Lutz ^a   Eichler, Mirjam ^a   Geis Gerstorfer, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Dynamic contact angle; Hydrophilicity; Surface topography; Tensiometry; Wettability

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WETTABILITY;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84863217662     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem 1994;56:340-347.
2. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:185-206.
3. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-854.
4. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:172-184.
5. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996;17:137-146.
6. Quere D. Wetting and roughness. Ann Rev Mater Res 2008;38:71-99.
7. Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface-energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1419-1425.
8. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
9. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:323-334.
10. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49-58.
11. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:329-345.
12. Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, et al. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-133.
13. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, et al. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium 1. Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:208-216.
14. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 2004;25:1429-1438.
15. Weikart CM, Miyama M, Yasuda HK. Surface modification of conventional polymers by depositing plasma polymers of trimethylsilane and of trimethylsilane plus O-2 II. Dynamic wetting properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 1999;211:28-38.
16. Good RJ. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: A critical review. In:Mittal KL (ed). Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion. Utrecht:VSP, 1993:3-36.
17. Extrand CW. A thermodynamic model for contact angle hysteresis. J Coll Interface Sci 1998;207:11-19.
18. Marmur A. Equilibrium contact angles: Theory and measurement. Coll Surf A 1996;116:55-61.
19. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:63-74.
20. Yang C, Tartaglino U, Persson BNJ. Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity. Phys Rev Lett 2006;97:116103.
21. Kang BS, Sul YT, Oh SJ, Lee HJ, Albrektsson T. XPS, AES and SEM analysis of recent dental implants. Acta Biomater 2009;5:2222-2229.
22. Hori N, Ueno T, Suzuki T, et al. Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:49-62.
23. Rupp F, Haupt M, Klostermann H, et al. Multifunctional nature of UV-irradiated nanocrystalline anatase thin films for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 2010;6:4566-4577.
24. Molenberg A, Schwarz F, Herten M, Berner S, de Wild M, Wieland M. Improved osseointegration of a novel, hydrophilic Ti surface:A review. Materwiss Werksttech 2009;40:31-35.
25. Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, et al. Review: Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B 2009; 88B:544-557.
26. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natiella RR, Carter JM. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: Methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res A 1984;18:337-355.
27. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Material-tissue interfaces: The role of surface properties and processes. Environ Health Perspect 1994;102:41-45.
28. Sela MN, Badihi L, Rosen G, Steinberg D, Kohavi D. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:630-638.
29. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007;28:2821-2829.
30. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acidetched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78A:291-297.
31. Wall I, Donos N, Carlqvist K, Jones F, Brett P. Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. Bone 2009;45:17-26.
32. Strnad J, Strnad Z, Sestak J, Urban K, Povysil C. Bio-activated titanium surface utilizable for mimetic bone implantation in dentistry-Part III: Surface characteristics and bone-implant contact formation. J Phys Chem Sol 2007;68:841-845.
33. von Wilmowsky C, Muller L, Lutz R, et al. Osseointegration of chemically modified titanium surfaces: An in vivo study. Adv Eng Mater 2008;10:B61-B66.
34. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2. Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-564-.