Bio-activated titanium surface utilizable for mimetic bone implantation in dentistry-Part III: Surface characteristics and bone-implant contact formation

Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

Volumn 68, Issue 5-6, 2007, Pages 841-845

  Strnad, Jakub ^a   Strnad, Zdeněk ^a   Šesták, Jaroslav ^b   Urban, Karel ^c   Povýšil, Ctibor ^d  

^a Laboratory for Glass and Ceramics (LASAK)   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WEST BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BIOACTIVITY; BONE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM;

BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; CONTACT FORMATION; MACHINED SURFACES; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 34250306815     PISSN: 00223697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.02.040     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. L.L. Hench, J. Wilson, An Introduction to Bioceramics, World Scientific Publishing Co., New Jersey, London, Hong Kong, 1993, Singapore, 1999.
2. Hench L.L. Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 1487-1570
3. Brånemark P.I. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 3 (1969) 81-93
4. Li P., and Hench L.L. An investigation of bioactive glass. J. Appl. Biomater. 2 (1991) 231-239
5. Li P. Bioactive glass-ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29 (1995) 325-328
6. Strnad Z. Role of the glass phase in bioactive glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 13 (1992) 317-321
7. Koga N., Strnad J., Strnad Z., and Šesták J. Thermodynamics of non-bridging oxygen in silica bio-compatible glass-ceramics, mimetic material for the bone tissue substitution. J. Thermal Anal. Calorimetry 71 (2003) 927-937
8. Z. Strnad, J. Šesták, Bio-compatible Ceramics, in: J. Meel (Ed.), invited plenary lecture at Third IPMM (Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials) in Vancouver, 2001, Proceedings by Vancouver University, Canada, 2001.
9. 5 glasses in SBF. J. Noncryst. Solids 143 (1992) 84-92
10. Li P. Effects of ions in aqueous media on HA induction. J. Appl. Biomater. 4 (1993) 221 AW
11. de Aza P.N. Bioceramics-sbf interfaces. J Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 7 (1996) 399
12. Hanawa P.N. Titanium and its oxide film, a substrate for formation of apatite. In: Davies J.E. (Ed). The Bone-biomaterial Interface (1990), University of Toronto Press 33
13. P. Li, P. Ducheyne, Quasi-biological apatite film induced by titanium in a simulated body fluid, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 5, 41(3) (1998) 341-348.
14. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Johansson C., and Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17 1 (1996) 15-22
15. Gotfredsen K., Berglundh T., and Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2 3 (2000) 120-128
16. Cochran D.L., Buser D., Bruggenkate C.M., Weingart D., Taylor T.M., Bernard J.P., Peters F., and Simpson J.P. The use of reduced healing times on TI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13 2 (2002) 144-153
17. Klokkevold P.R., Johnson P., Dadgostari S., Caputo A., Davies J.E., and Nishimura R.D. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12 4 (2001) 350-357
18. Khang W., Feldman S., Hawley C.E., and Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J. Periodontol. 72 10 (2001) 1384-1390
19. Lazzara R.J. Bone response to dual acid-etched and machined titanium implant surfaces. In: Davies J.E. (Ed). Bone Engineering (2000), Emsquared Inc, Toronto 381-388
20. J. Strnad, J. Šesták, Z. Strnad, Thermodynamic properties of potentially bioactive materials: part III-surface characteristics, J. Thermal Anal. Calor. 2007, in press.
21. Corioli G., Majzoub Z., and Piatelli A. Romoval torque and histomophometric investigation of 4 different titanium substrates: an experimental study in the rabbit tiba. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 15 5 (2000)
22. Albrektsson T., and Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part I-review focusing on topographic and clinical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17 5 (2004)
23. Sul Y.T., Johansson C., Wenneberg A., Cho L., Chang B., and Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized IMplants for reinforcement of osseointegration surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness and crystal structure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 20 (2005) 349
24. J.R. Jones, Observing cell response to biomaterials, Materials Today 9, 2006, p. 34, Biomaterials 27, 2006, p. 964.
25. P. Li, P. Ducheyne, Quasi-biological apatite film induced by titanium in a simulated body fluid, J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 5, 41(3) (1998) 341-348.
26. Wennerberg A., and Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 5 3 (2000)
27. Vercaigne S., Wolke J.G., Naert I., and Jansen J.A. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oral implants. Oral Implants Res. 9 (1998) 261-271
28. Sun L., Berndt C.C., Gross K.A., and Kucuk A. Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: a review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58 (2001) 570-592
29. Strnad Z., Strnad J., Povýšil C., and Urban K. Effect of plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on osteoconductivity of titanium implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15 (2000) 483-490
30. Liao H., Fartash B., and Li J. Stability of hydroxyapatite coatingson titanium oral implants (IMZ): 2 retrieved cases. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 8 1 (1997) 68-72
31. Rohrer M.D., Sobczak R.R., Prasad H.S., and Morris H.F. Postmortemhistologic evaluation of mandibular titanium andmaxillary hydroxyapatite-coated implants from one patient. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 14 4 (1999) 579-586
32. Block M.S., Gardiner D., Kent J.N., Misiek D.J., Finger I.M., and Guerra L. Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 11 5 (1996) 626-633
33. Wheeler S.L. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 11 3 (1996) 340-350
34. Geurs N.C., Jeffcoat R.L., McGlumphy E.A., Reddy M.S., and Jeffcoat M.K. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 17 6 (2002) 811
35. McGlumphy M.A., Peterson L.J., Larsen P.E., and Jeffcoat M.K. Prospective study of hydroxyaptite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 18 1 (2003) 82-92
36. Schwartz-Arad D., Mardinger O., Levin L., Kozlovsky A., and Hirshberg A. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 2 (2005) 238-244
37. Strnad J., Protivínský J., Mazur D., Veltruská K., Strnad Z., Helebrant A., and Šesták J. Interaction of acid and alkali treated titanium with dynamic simulated body environment. J. Thermal Anal. Cal. 76 (2004) 17-31
38. Šimůnek A., Strnad J., Novák J., Strnad Z., Kopecká D., and Mounajjed R. STI-Bio titanium implants with bioactive surface design. Clin. Oral. Impl. Res. 12 (2001) 393-421
39. Šimůnek A., Strnad J., and Štěpánek A. Bioactive titanium implants for shorter healing period. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 13 4 (2002)
40. Štěpánek A., Šimůnek A., Strnad J., and Strnad Z. Early loading (4 weeks) of dental implants with bioactive surface in maxilla and mandible monitoring of the healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Quintessenz 14 (2005) 51-58 [in Czech]
41. Šimůnek A., Kopecká D., and Strnad J. Shortening of the healing time for implants with bioactive surface. Quintessenz 13 (2004) 34-38
42. Ellingsen J.E. Improved retention and bone to implant contact with fluoride modified titanium implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 19 (2004) 659-666
43. Ellingsen J.E. On the properties of surface-modified titanium. In: Davies J.E. (Ed). Bone Eng. (2000), Em squared Inc, Toronto 183-189
44. Ducheyne P., and Qiu Q. Bioactive ceramics: the effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. Biomaterials 20 (1999) 2287-2303
45. Keselowsky B.G., Collard D.M., and García A.J. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5947-5954
46. Lampin M., Warocquier-Cclerout R., and Legris C. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion and cell migration. Biomed. Mater. Res. 36 (1997) 99-108
47. Webb K., Hlady V., and Tresco P.A. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organization. J. Biomed Mater. Res. 41 (1998) 422-442
48. J. Strnad, Kinetics of hydroxyapatite formation on inorganic bioactive materials, Ph.D. Thesis, Prague Institute of Chemical Technology, Czech Republic 2004.
49. El-Ghannam A., Ducheyne P., and Shapiro I.M. Formation of surface reaction products on bioactive glass and their effects on the expression of the osteoblastic phenotype and the deposition of mineralized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 18 (1997) 295-303