Interactions for pollinator visitation and their consequences for reproduction in a plant community

Acta Oecologica

Volumn 43, Issue , 2012, Pages 95-103

  Hegland, Stein Joar ^a,b   Totland, Ørjan ^c  

^a University College of Sogn and Fjordane   (Norway)

^b Norwegian Red Deer Centre   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Competition; Facilitation; Floral traits; Pollen limitation; Pollinator visitation; Reproductive success

Indexed keywords

FACILITATION; FLOWER VISITING; FRUIT PRODUCTION; HERB; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; META-ANALYSIS; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATOR; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

EID: 84863211872     PISSN: 1146609X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aguilar R., Ashworth L., Galetto L., Aizen M.A. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:968-980.
2. Ashman T.L., Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Amarasekare P., Burd M., Campbell D.R., Dudash M.R., Johnston M.O., Mazer S.J., Mitchell R.J., Morgan M.T., Wilson W.G. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 2004, 85:2408-2421.
3. Bell J.M., Karron J.D., Mitchell R.J. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Ecology 2005, 86:762-771.
4. Bierzychudek P. Asclepias, Lantana, and Epidendrum: a floral mimicry complex. Biotropica 1981, 13:54-58.
5. Bouwmeester H.J., Smid H.G. Seed yield in Caraway (Carum carvi). 1. Role of pollination. J. Agri. Sci. 1995, 124:235-244.
6. Brown J.H., Kodric-Brown A. Convergence, competition, and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers. Ecology 1979, 60:1022-1035.
7. Bruno J.F., Stachowicz J.J., Bertness M.D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18:119-125.
8. Burdon J.J. Biological flora of the British Isles: Trifolium repens L. J. Ecol. 1983, 71:307-330.
9. Campbell D.R., Motten A.F. The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 1985, 66:554-563.
10. Caruso C.M., Alfaro M. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregata. Can. J. Bot. 2000, 78:600-606.
11. Caruso C.M. Influence of plant abundance on pollination and selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 2002, 83:241-254.
12. Chittka L., Kevan P.G. Flower colour as advertisement. Practical Pollination Biology 2005, 157-196. Enviroquest Ltd., Cambridge, UK. A. Dafni, P.G. Kevan, B.C. Husband (Eds.).
13. Chittka L., Schürkens S. Successful invasion of a floral market: an exotic Asian plant has moved in on Europe's river-banks by bribing pollinators. Nature 2001, 411:653.
14. Chittka L., Gumbert A., Kunze J. Foraging dynamics of bumble bees: correlates of movements within and between plant species. Behav. Ecol. 1997, 8:239-249.
15. Clifford H.T. Insect pollination of Plantago lanceolata L. Nature 1962, 193:196.
16. van Damme J.M.M. Gynodioecy in Plantago lancolata L. III. Sexual reproduction and the maintenance of male steriles. Heredity 1984, 52:77-93.
17. Ecological Database of the British Isles 2007, Last accessed on 1 Feb. 2007. http://www.york.ac.uk/res/ecoflora/cfm/ecofl/index.cfm.
18. Feinsinger P., Tiebout H.M., Young B.E. Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology 1991, 72:1953-1963.
19. Feinsinger P. Effects of plant species on each others pollination: is community structure influenced. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987, 2:123-126.
20. Feldman T.S., Morris W.F., Wilson W.G. When can two plant species facilitate each other's pollination?. Oikos 2004, 105:197-207.
21. Fishman L., Wyatt R. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 1999, 53:1723-1733.
22. French G.C., Ennos R.A., Silverside A.J., Hollingsworth P.M. The relationship between flower size, inbreeding coefficient and inferred selfing rate in British Euphrasia species. Heredity 2005, 94:44-51.
23. Ghazoul J. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J. Ecol. 2006, 94:295-304.
24. Glantz S.A., Slinker B.K. Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance 2001, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. second ed.
25. Goulson D. Are insects flower constant because they use search images to find flowers?. Oikos 2000, 88:547-552.
26. Grabas G.P., Laverty T.M. The effect of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L, Lythraceae) on the pollination and reproductive success of sympatric co-flowering wetland plants. Ecoscience 1999, 6:230-242.
27. Hardy O.J., De Loose M., Vekemans X., Meerts P. Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity 2001, 87:136-145.
28. Hegland S.J., Totland Ø. Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 2005, 145:586-594.
29. Hegland S.J., Totland Ø. Pollen limitation affects progeny vigour and subsequent recruitment in the insect-pollinated herb Ranunculus acris. Oikos 2007, 116:1204-1210.
30. Hegland S.J., Totland Ø. Is the magnitude of pollen limitation in a plant community affected by pollinator visitation and plant species specialisation levels?. Oikos 2008, 117:883-891.
31. Hegland S.J., Grytnes J.-A., Totland Ø. The relative importance of positive and negative interactions for pollinator attraction in a plant community. Ecol. Res. 2009, 24:929-936.
32. Hegland S.J., Dunne J., Nielsen A., Memmott J. How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: the example of plant-pollinator networks. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:2092-2101.
33. Irkaeva N.M., Ankudinova I.N. Evaluation of the outbreeding level of the strawberry Fragaria vesca L. using genetic markers. Genetika 1994, 30:816-822.
34. Klein A.M., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J. Appl. Ecol. 2003, 40:837-845.
35. Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Vamosi J.C., Mazer S.J., Burd M., Campbell D.R., Dudash M.R., Johnston M.O., Mitchell R.J., Ashman T.-L. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36:467-497.
36. Knight T.M., Steets J.A., Ashman T.-L. A quantitative synthesis of pollen supplementation experiments highlights the contribution of resource reallocation to estimates of pollen limitation. Am. J. Bot. 2006, 93:271-277.
37. Kunin W.E. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 1993, 74:2145-2160.
38. Laverty T.M. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia 1992, 89:502-508.
39. Laverty T.M. Costs to foraging bumble bees of switching plant species. Can. J. Bot. 1994, 72:43-47.
40. Lid J., Lid D.T. Norsk Flora 1994, Norway, Samlaget, Oslo. sixth ed.
41. McGuire A.D. Interactions for pollination between two synchronously blooming Hedysarum species (Fabaceae) in Alaska. Am. J. Bot. 1993, 80:147-152.
42. Mitchell R.J., Flanagan R.J., Brown B.J., Waser N.M., Karron J.D. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1403-1413.
43. Moeller D.A. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 2004, 85:3289-3301.
44. Moragues E., Traveset A. Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 122:611-619.
45. Morris W.F. Which mutualists are most essential? Buffering of plant reproduction against the extinction of pollinators. The Importance of Species: Perspectives on Expendability and Triage 2003, 260-280. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. P. Kareiva, S.A. Levin (Eds.).
46. Mosquin T. Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for evolution of flowering time. Oikos 1971, 22:398-402.
47. Norderhaug A. Mating systems of three meadow plant-species. Nord. J. Bot. 1995, 15:243-250.
48. Nyman Y. Pollination mechanisms in six Campanula species (Campanulaceae). Plant Sys. Evol. 1992, 181:97-108.
49. Palmer T.M., Stanton M.L., Young T.P. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:S63-S79.
50. Petraitis P.S., Beaupre S.J., Dunham A.E. ANCOVA: nonparametric and randomization approaches. ANCOVA: Nonparametric and Randomization Approaches 2001, 116-133. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. S.M. Scheiner, J. Gurevitch (Eds.).
51. Proctor M., Yeo P., Lack A. The Natural History of Pollination 1996, Harper Collins Publisher, London, UK.
52. Rathcke B. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Ecology 1983, 325-329. Academic Press Inc., Orlando, USA. R. Leslie (Ed.).
53. Rosenberg M.S., Adams D.C., Gurevitch J. Metawin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis, Version 2 2000, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
54. Roy B.A., Widmer A. Floral mimicry: a fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4:325-330.
55. Sargent R.D., Kembel S.W., Emery N.C., Forrestel E.J., Ackerly D.D. Effect of local community phylogenetic structure on pollen limitation in an obligately insect-pollinated plant. Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98:283-289.
56. Schemske D.W. Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 1981, 62:946-954.
57. Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 1999, 121:432-440.
58. Steffan-Dewenter I., Munzenberg U., Burger C., Thies C., Tscharntke T. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 2002, 83:1421-1432.
59. Thomson J.D. Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment by flower feeding insects. J. Anim. Ecol. 1981, 50:49-59.
60. Totland Ø. Intraseasonal variation in pollination intensity and seed set in an alpine population of Ranunculus acris in southwestern Norway. Ecography 1994, 17:159-165.
61. Vange V. Breeding system and inbreeding depression in the clonal plant species Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae): implications for survival in abandoned grassland. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 108:59-67.
62. Waser N.M. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 1978, 59:934-944.
63. Waser N.M. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Ecology 1983, 277-293. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, USA. C.E. Jones, R.J. Little (Eds.).
64. Waser N.M. Flower constancy: definition, cause and measurement. Am. Nat. 1986, 127:593-603.
65. Watson P.J. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations: 6. An entomophilous species, Potentilla erecta, in two contrasting habitats. Heredity 1969, 24:407-422.
66. Winn A.A., Werner P.A. Regulation of seed yield within and among populations of Prunella vulgaris. Ecology 1987, 68:1224-1233.