Demand the data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 862-863

  Petersen, Bret T ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CECUM; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL CANCER; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTUBATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW;

ADENOMA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS;

EID: 33947697803     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01050.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81.
2. Walsh JME, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening. Scientific review. JAMA 2003;289:1288-94.
3. Rex DK, Cutler CSW, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8.
4. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5.
5. Barclay R, Vicari JJ, Johanson JF, et al. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:AB107.
6. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61.
7. Harewood G, Ott B. Cecal intubation rates and endoscopist features: Implications for maintaining endoscopic competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:AB81.
8. Ball JE, Osbourne J, Jowett S, et al. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: Prospective before and after study. BMJ 2004;329:665-7.
9. Harewood GC, Petersen BT, Ott BJ. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:313-8.
10. Seaman DL, Harewood G, Petersen B, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of feedback on small bowel biopsy performance. Gastroenterology 2006;130:A300.
11. Abdalla AA, Petersen BT, Ott BJ, et al. Impact of feedback and didactic sessions on the reporting behavior of upper endoscopic findings by physicians and nurses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 [in press].