Industrial Land and Property Markets: Market Processes, Market Institutions and Market Outcomes: The Dutch Case

European Planning Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2127-2146

  van der Krabben, Erwin ^a,b   Buitelaar, Edwin ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^c PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LAND MARKET; LAND USE PLANNING; MARKET CONDITIONS; PROPERTY MARKET;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84857799223     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.633822     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alberini, A., Longo, A., Tonin, S., Trombetta, F. and Turvani, M. 2005. The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: Evidence from surveys of developers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(4): 327-351.
2. Alchian, A. A. and Demsetz, H. 1973. The property rights paradigm. Journal of Economic History, 33(1): 16-27.
3. Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P. and Smith, N. 2000. The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(1): 49-69.
4. Anderson, E. and Catignon, H. 2008. "Firms and the creation of new markets". in: C. Ménard & M. M. Shirly (Eds). Handbook of New Institutional Economics, pp. 401-431 (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer)
5. Barzel, Y. 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bromley, D. W. 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy, Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Buitelaar, E. 2003. Neither market nor government. Comparing the performance of user rights regimes. Town Planning Review, 74(3): 315-330.
8. Buitelaar, E. 2007. The Cost of Land Use Decisions. Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning & Development, Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Buitelaar, E., van der Heijden, R. and Argiolu, R. 2007. Managing traffic by privatisation of road capacity: A property rights approach. Transport Reviews, 27(4): 699-713.
10. Casson, M. 1982. The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
11. CBS (2004) Investeringen in vaste activa in de nijverheid (Voorburg: Centraal Bureau Voor de Statistiek). Available at www.statline.nl (accessed 1 June 2010).
12. Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1): 1-44.
13. Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Cook, G. 1989. Local authorities and industrial property markets. Property Management, 7(1): 3-12.
15. Evans, A. W. 2004. Economics, Real Estate & the Supply of Land, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
16. Fothergill, S., Monk, S. and Perry, M. 1987. Property and Industrial Development, London: Hutchinson.
17. Giussani, B., Hsia, M. and Tsolakos, S. 1992. A comparative analysis of the major determinants of office rental values in Europe. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 11(1): 157-173.
18. Gorman, H. S. 2005. Brownfields in historical context. Environmental Practice, 5(1): 21-24.
19. Heberle, L. and Wernstedt, K. 2006. Understanding brownfields regeneration in the US. Local Environment, 11(5): 479-497.
20. Henneberry, J. 1988. Conflict in the industrial property market. Town Planning Review, 59(3): 241-262.
21. Henneberry, J. 1996. Property Market Structure and Behaviour: The Interaction of Use and Investment Sectors and its Impact on Urban and Regional Development, London: The Cutting Edge, RICS Research.
22. Hodgson, G. M. 2002. The legal nature of the firm and the myth of the firm-market hybrid. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9(1): 37-60.
23. Hodgson, G. M. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routledge.
24. IBIS. 2008. IBIS Werklocaties, Den Haag: MinVROM.
25. IVBN. 2006. De vastgoedbeleggingsmarkt in Nederland in 2006, Voorburg: IVBN.
26. Jones, C. 2005. A regional perspective on the impact of the privatisation of the UK public industrial property stock. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(1): 123-139.
27. van der Krabben, E. 2009. A property rights approach to externality problems: Planning based on compensation rules. Urban Studies, 46(13): 2869-2890.
28. van der Krabben, E. and Lambooy, J. 1993. A theoretical framework for the functioning of the Dutch property market. Urban Studies, 30(8): 1381-1397.
29. Lai, L. W. C. 1997. Property rights justifications for planning and a theory of zoning. Progress in Planning, 48(3): 161-246.
30. Lai, L. W. C. 2007. The problem of social cost: The Coase theorem and externality explained. Town Planning Review, 78(3): 335-368.
31. Lai, L. W. C. and Hung, C. W. Y. 2008. The inner logic of the Coase theorem and a Coasian planning research agenda. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(2): 207-226.
32. Levačić, R. 1991. "Markets and government: An overview". In Markets, Hierarchies & Networks: The Coordination of Social Life, Edited by: Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levačić, R. and Mitchell, J. 35-47. London: Sage.
33. Lindblom, C. E. 2001. The Market System. What it is, How it Works and What to Make of It, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34. Loasby, B. J. 2000. Market institutions and economic evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(3): 297-309.
35. Louw, E. and Bontekoning, Y. 2007. Planning of industrial land in the Netherlands: Its rationales and consequences. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(1): 121-129.
36. Louw, E., Needham, B., Olden, H. and Pen, C. J. 2004. Planning van bedrijventerreinen, Den Haag: Sdu uitgevers.
37. MacLennan, D. & More, A. (1997) The future of Social Housing; key economic questions, Housing Studies, 12(4), pp. 531-547.
38. MacLennan, D. and More, A. 1997. The future of Social Housing: Key economic questions. Housing Studies, 12(4): 531-547.
39. McCarthy, L. 2002. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: Reducing barriers to private development while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy, 19(4): 287-296.
40. McNutt, P. 2000. "Public goods and club goods". In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Vol. I: The History and Methodology of Law and Economics, Edited by: Bouckaert, B. and de Geest, G. 927-951. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
41. Meyer, P. B. and Lyons, T. S. 2000. Lessons from private sector brownfield redevelopers. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1): 46-57.
42. MinEZ. 2004. Actieplan bedrijventerreinen, Den Haag: Ministerie Economische Zaken.
43. MinVROM. 2007. Een structuurvisie voor de "Panorama's en de snelwegzone" Brief aan Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal, The Hague
44. MinVROM (2008) Landscape Cluttering. Available at www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=37396 (accessed 1 June 2010).
45. Needham, B. 2006a. Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
46. Needham, B. 2006b. Een andere taakverdeling. Privaatrechtelijke regels voor bedrijventerreinen. S&RO, 87(3): 40-43.
47. Needham, B. and Louw, E. 2006. Institutional economics and policies for changing land markets: The case of industrial estates in the Netherlands. Journal of Property Research, 23(1): 75-90.
48. NVB. 2010. Thermometer Bedrijjfsruimten, Voorburg: Nederlandse Vereniging van Bouwondernemers.
49. Olden, H. (2010) Uit voorraad leverbaar. De overgewaardeerde rol van bouwrijpe grond als vestigingsfactor bij de planning van bedrijventerreinen (Utrecht: GeoMedia).
50. van Oort, F., Ponds, R., van Vliet, J., van Amsterdam, H., Declerck, S., Knoben, J., Pellenbarg, P. and Weltevreden, J. 2007. Achtergronden: Verhuizing van bedrijven en groei van werkgelegenheid, Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
51. Pennington, M. 2000. Planning and the Political Market, London: Athlone Press.
52. Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare, London: MacMillan.
53. PBL (Planbureau Voor de Leefomgeving). 2009. De toekomst van bedrijventerreinen: van uitbreiding naar herstructurering, Den Haag: PBL.
54. Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
55. Renes, G., Thissen, M. and Segeren, A. 2006. Betaalbaarheid van koopwoningen en het ruimtelijk beleid, Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
56. ROZ/IPD (2008) Vastgoed Jaarindex 2007. Available at www.rozindex.nl (accessed 1 June 2010).
57. Ruimtelijk Planbureau. 2006. Bloeiende bermen. Vestedelijking langs de snelweg, Rotterdam: NAi Uitgevers.
58. Simons, R. and Jaouhari, A. E. 2001. Local government intervention in the brownfields arena. Economic Development Commentary, 25(3): 12-18.
59. Stec Groep/NVB. 2005. Bedrijfsruimtegebruikers in beeld, Voorburg: NVB.
60. STOGO (2007) Beleid voor bedrijventerreinen in Vlaanderen, Duitsland, Verenigd Koninkrijk en Frankrijk (Utrecht: STOGO).
61. Strabo (2008) Vastgoedtransactie Informatiesysteem. Available atwww.strabo.nl
62. THB. 2008. Kansen voor Kwaliteit, een ontwikkelingstrategie voor bedrijventerreinen, Den Haag: Advies van de Taskforce (her)ontwikkeling bedrijventerreinen aan Minister van VROM en Minister van EZ.
63. TK. 2008. Kabinetsreactie Taskforce (her)ontwikkeling bedrijventerreinen Tweede Kamer 2007-2008, The Hague, pp. 31253-31258
64. Tsolacos, S. 1997. A case study of industrial property development in South Hampshire. Journal of Property Research, 14(3): 211-236.
65. VROM-Raad. 2006. Werklandschappen: een regionale strategie voor bedrijventerreinen, Den Haag: VROM-Raad.
66. Webster, C. J. 1998. Public choice. Pigovian and Coasian Planning Theory. Urban Studies, 35(1): 53-75.
67. Webster, C. J. and Lai, L. W. C. 2003. Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
68. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.
69. Zhu, J. M. 2000. The impact of industrial land use policy on industrial change. Land Use Policy, 17(1): 21-28.