The role of the public sector in urban development: Lessons from Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (The Netherlands)

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 29-44

  Verhage, Roelof ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING POLICY; PLANNING PROCESS; PUBLIC SECTOR; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; UTRECHT; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 0942291478     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1464935032000057191     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albrechts, L. (1991) Changing roles and positions of planners, Urban Studies, 28(1), pp. 123-137.
2. Badcock, B. (1994) The strategic implications for the Randstad of the Dutch property system, Urban Studies, 31(3), pp. 425-445.
3. Ball, M. (1998) Institutions in British property research: a review, Urban Studies, 35(9), pp. 1502-1517.
4. Ennis, F. (1997) Infrastructure provision, the negotiating process and the planner's role, Urban Studies, 34(12), pp. 1935-1954.
5. Faludi, A. (1987) A Decision Centred View of Environmental Planning (Oxford, Pergamon Press).
6. Faludi, A. & Van der Valk, A. (1994) Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).
7. Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (Eds) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Durham and London, Duke University Press).
8. Gemeente Utrecht (1995) Masterplan Leidsche Rijn (Utrecht).
9. Gemeente Utrecht (1997) Ontwikkelingsvisie Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (Utrecht).
10. Gemeente Utrecht (1999) Actualisatie Ontwikkelingsvisie Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (Utrecht).
11. Healey, P. (1992) An institutional model of the development process, Journal of Property Research, 9, pp. 33-44.
12. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (London, Macmillan Press).
13. Healey, P., Purdue, M. & Ennis, F. (1995) Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practices for Development Obligations and Planning Gain (London, E&FN Spon).
14. Lacaze, J.P. (1995) Introduction à la Planification Urbaine: Imprécis de l'urbanisme à la Française (Paris, Presses de l'école nationale des ponts et chaussées).
15. Martinand, C. & Landrieu, J. (1996) L'aménagement en Questions (Paris, adef).
16. Mastop, H. & Faludi, A. (1997) Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, pp. 815-832.
17. Ministerie van VROM (1991) Vierde Nota Ruimtijke Ordening Extra, deel a, regeringsbeslissing ('s-Gravenhage, Ministerie van VROM).
18. Ministerie van VROM (1999) Evaluatie Nota Volkshuisvesting in de Jaren '90 (Den Haag, Ministerie VROM).
19. Morand-Deviller, J. (1998) Droit de l'urbanisme, 4th edn. Mémentos Dalloz série droit public-science politique (Paris, Dalloz).
20. Needham, B. (1997) Land policy in the Netherlands, Tidschrift van Economische und Sozialen Geografie, 88(3), pp. 291-296.
21. Needham, B. & Verhage, R. (1998) The effects of land policy: quantity as well as quality is important, Urban Studies, 35(1), pp. 25-44.
22. Teisman, G.R. (1992) Complexe besluitvorming: een pluricentrisch perspektief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen ('s-Gravenhage, VUGA).
23. Van der Krabben, E. (1995) Urban dynamics: a real estate perspective, an institutional analysis of the production of the built environment. PhD thesis (Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg).
24. Verhage, R. (1998) Wie betaalt de woonomgeving na de Vinex? Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening, 1998/4, pp. 19-48.
25. Verhage, R. (2002a) Local Policy for Housing Development: European Experiences (Aldershot, Ashgate).
26. Verhage, R. (2002b) Induced cooperation in housing development: comparing housing schemes in four different countries, European Planning Studies, 10(3), pp. 305-320.
27. Verhage, R. & Ouwehand, A. (2000) Sturen of Gestuurd Worden: Tussentijdse Evaluatie Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (Delft, DUP Satellite).
28. Voogd, H. (2001) Social dilemmas and the communicative planning paradox, Town Planning Review, 72(1), pp. 77-95.