The dental amalgam toxicity fear: A myth or actuality

Toxicology International

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 81-88

  Rathore, Monika ^a   Singh, Archana ^a   Pant, Vandana A ^a  

^a BBD College of Dental Sciences   (India)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Mercury; Myth; Restoration; Safety; Tooth; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

COPPER; DENTAL ALLOY; MERCURY; METHYLMERCURY; ORGANOMERCURY COMPOUND; SILVER; TIN; ZINC;

AMNION FLUID; ARTHRITIS; BLOATING; DENTAL HEALTH; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTISTRY; DRY SKIN; HAIR ANALYSIS; HEADACHE; HUMAN; HYPERSENSITIVITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LICHENOID; MEDLINE; MOUTH LESION; NEUROMUSCULAR SYSTEM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SLEEP DISORDER; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; URINALYSIS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84862991243     PISSN: 09716580     EISSN: 09765131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6580.97191     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Berry TG, Summit JB, Chung AK, Osborne JW. Amalgam at the new millennium. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1547-56. (Pubitemid 128454242)
2. Dunne SM, Grainsford ID, Wilson NH. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 1: Silver amalgam. Int Dent J 1997;47:123-36. (Pubitemid 127517734)
3. Brownawell AM, Berent S, Brent RL, Bruckner JV, Doull J, Gershwin EM, et al. The potential adverse health effects of dental amalgam. Toxicol Rev 2005;24:1-10. (Pubitemid 41215503)
4. Marshall SJ, Grayson W, Marshall JR, Anusavice KJ. Philips Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. India: Elsevier Sciences; 2006. p. 499-500.
5. Eames WB. Preparation and condensation of amalgam with a low mercuryalloy ratio. J Am Dent Assoc 1959;58:78-83.
6. Innes DB, Youdelis WV. Dispersion strengthened amalgam. J Can Dent Assoc 1963;29:587-93.
7. Asgar K. Behavior of copper in dispersed amalgam alloy, abstracted, IADR Program and abstracts of Papers, No. 15; 1971.
8. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Missouri: Mosby Inc; 2006. p. 151-64.
9. American Society of Dental Surgeons. 1″American Journal of Dental Science. Massachusetts, U.S: Harvard University; 1845. p. 170.
10. Molin C. Amalgam - fact and fiction. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:66-73.
11. Bremner MDK. The Story of Dentistry from the Dawn of Civilization to the Present Dental Items of Interest Brooklyn, Dental Items of Interest Pub. Co; 1939. p. 86-7.
12. National Institute of Health: Effects and side effects of dental restorative materials. NIH Technol Assess Statement Online 1991 Aug 26-28; (9): 18.
13. Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Leininger RW, Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from dental fillings into monkey tissues. FASEB J 1990;4:3256-60. (Pubitemid 120012573)
14. Takahashi Y, Tsuruta S, Arimoto M, Tanaka H, Yoshida M. Placental transfer of mercury in pregnant rats which received dental amalgam rstorations. Toxicology 2003;185:23-33. (Pubitemid 36050728)
15. Brune D, Gjerdet N, Paulsen G. Gastrointestinal and in vitro release of copper, cadmium, indium, mercury and zinc from conventional and copper-rich amalgams. Scand J Dent Res 1983;91:66-71. (Pubitemid 13128260)
16. Berglund A. Estimation by a 24-hour study of the daily dose of intra-oral mercury vapour inhaled after release from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1990;69:1646-51. (Pubitemid 20364426)
17. Berdouses E, Vaidyanathan TK, Dastane A, Weisel C, Houpt M, Shey Z. Mercury release from dental amalgams: an in vitro study under controlled chewing and brushing in an artificial mouth. J Dent Res 1995;74:1185-93.
18. Berglund A. An in vitro and in vivo study of the release of mercury vapor from different types of amalgam alloys. J Dent Res 1993;72:939-46. (Pubitemid 23190003)
19. Berglund M, Lind B, Björnberg KA, Palm B, Einarsson O, Vahter M. Inter-individual variations of human mercury exposure biomarkers: a cross-sectional assessment. Environ Health 2005;4:20.
20. Morton J, Mason HJ, Ritchie KA, White M. Comparison of hair, nails and urine for biological monitoring of low level inorganic mercury exposure in dental workers. Biomarkers 2004;9:47-55. (Pubitemid 38660015)
21. Luglie PF, Campus G, Chessa G, Spano G, Capo bianco G, Fadda GM, et al. Effect of amalgam fillings on the mercury concentration in human amniotic fluid. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;271:138-42. (Pubitemid 40476245)
22. Palkovicova L, Ursinyova M, Masanova V, Yu Z, Hertz-Picciotto I. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008;18:326-31. (Pubitemid 351556083)
23. Hujoel PP, Lydon-Rochelle M, Bollen AM, Woods JS, Geurtsen W, del Aguila MA. Mercury exposure from dental filling placement during pregnancy and low birth weight risk. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:734-40.
24. Daniels JL, Rowland AS, Longnecker MP, Crawford P, Golding J; ALSPAC Study Team. Maternal dental history, child's birth outcome and early cognitive development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:448-57. (Pubitemid 47256232)
25. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, et al. Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;295:1775-83.
26. Bellinger DC, Daniel D, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, McKinlay S. Dental amalgam restorations and children's neuropsychological function: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:440-6. (Pubitemid 46554445)
27. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Daniel D, Zhang A, Tavares MA, McKinlay S. A dose-effect analysis of children's exposure to dental amalgam and neuropsychological function: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1210-6.
28. Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Zhang A, Tavares M, Daniel D, McKinlay S. Dental amalgam and psychosocial status: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Dent Res 2008;87:470-4.
29. Kingman A, Albers JW, Arezzo JC, Garabrant DH, Michalek JE. Amalgam exposure and neurological function. Neurotoxicology 2005;26:241-55. (Pubitemid 40248442)
30. Barregard L, Trachtenberg F, McKinlay S. Renal effects of dental amalgam in children: the New England children's amalgam trial. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:394-9. (Pubitemid 351395610)
31. DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Townes BD, Woods JS, Leitão J, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;295:1784-92.
32. Lauterbach M, Martins IP, Castro-Caldas A, Bernardo M, Luis H, Amaral H, et al. Neurological outcomes in children with and without amalgam-related mercury exposure: seven years of longitudinal observations in a randomized trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:138-45.
33. Woods JS, Martin MD, Leroux BG, DeRouen TA, Leitão JG, Bernardo MF, et al. The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:1527-31. (Pubitemid 47618097)
34. Dunn JE, Trachtenberg FL, Barregard L, Bellinger D, McKinlay S. Scalp hair and urine mercury content of children in the Northeast United States: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Environ Res 2008;107:79-88. (Pubitemid 351508245)
35. Levy M, Schwartz S, Dijak M, Weber JP, Tardif R, Rouah F. Childhood urine mercury excretion: dental amalgam and fish consumption as exposure factors. Environ Res 2004;94:283-90. (Pubitemid 38328682)
36. Bates MN, Fawcett J, Garrett N, Cutress T, Kjellstrom T. Health effects of dental amalgam exposure: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:894-902. (Pubitemid 39263875)
37. Bailer J, Rist F, Rudolf A, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P, Triebig G, et al. Adverse health effects related to mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings: toxicological or psychological causes? Psychol Med 2001;31:255-63. (Pubitemid 32166393)
38. Aminzadeh KK, Etminan M. Dental amalgam and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Public Health Dent 2007;67:64-6.
39. Halbach S, Vogt S, Köhler W, Felgenhauer N, Welzl G, Kremers L, et al. Blood and urine mercury levels in adult amalgam patients of a randomized controlled trial: interaction of Hg species in erythrocytes. Environ Res 2008;107:69-78. (Pubitemid 351508240)
40. Smart ER, McLead RI, Lawrence CM. Resolution of lichen planus following removal of amalgam restorations in patients with proven allergy to mercury salts: a pilot study. Br Dent J 1995;178:108-12.
41. McCullough MJ, Tyas MJ. Local adverse effects of amalgam restorations. Int Dent J 2008;58:3-9.
42. Forte G, Petrucci F, Bocca B. Metal allergens of growing significance: epidemiology, immunotoxicology, strategies for testing and prevention. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2008;7:145-62. Review.
43. Bains VK, Loomba K, Loomba A, Bains R. Mercury sensitisation: review, relevance and a clinical report. Br Dent J 2008;205:373-8.
44. Ritchie KA, Burke FJ, Gilmour WH, Macdonald EB, Dale IM, Hamilton RM, et al. Mercury vapour levels in dental practices and body mercury levels of dentists and controls. Br Dent J 2004;197:625-32; discussion 621.
45. Jones L, Bunnell J, Stillman J. A 30-year follow-up of residual effects on New Zealand School Dental Nurses, from occupational mercury exposure. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007;26:367-74. (Pubitemid 46733361)
46. Atesagaoglu A, Omurlu H, Ozcagli E, Sardas S, ErtasN. Mercury exposure in dental practice. Oper Dent 2006;31:666-9. (Pubitemid 44886160)
47. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental mercury hygiene recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1498-9.
48. Fuks AB. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:448-55.
49. Sasaki N, Okuda K, Kato T, Kakishima H, Okuma H, Abe K, et al. Salivary bisphenol-A levels detected by ELISA after restoration with composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:297-300. (Pubitemid 40558509)
50. Christensen GJ. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:201-3. (Pubitemid 40321229)
51. Leinfelder KF. Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composites? J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1186-7.
52. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:763-72.
53. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:775-783.