Disassembly process planning algorithms for end-of-life product recovery and environmentally conscious disposal

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 49, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 7007-7027

  Ma, Yoen Seok ^a   Jun, Hong Bae ^b   Kim, Hyung Won ^c   Lee, Dong Ho ^c  

^a LG Electronics Inc   (South Korea)

^b Hong Ik University   (South Korea)

^c Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Case study; Disassembly level and sequence; Disassembly process planning; End oflife (EOL) options; Environmental impact; Heuristics

Indexed keywords

AND/OR GRAPHS; DECISION VARIABLES; DISASSEMBLY LEVEL AND SEQUENCE; DISASSEMBLY PROCESS PLANNING; DISASSEMBLY SEQUENCE; END-OF-LIFE; END-OF-LIFE PRODUCTS; END-OFLIFE (EOL) OPTIONS; HEURISTICS; PRODUCT STRUCTURE; RECOVERY RATE; SEQUENCE DEPENDENT SETUPS; TWO PHASE ALGORITHM;

ALGORITHMS; ASSEMBLY; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; INCINERATION; PROCESS PLANNING; PROFITABILITY; RECOVERY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 84862939665     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.495089     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adenso-Diaz, B., Garcia-Carbajal, S., and Gupta, S.M., 2008. A path-relinking approach for a bi-criteria disassembly sequencing problem. Computers and Operations Research, 35 (12), 3989-3997. (Pubitemid 351608452)
2. Erdos, G., Kritsis, T., and Xirouchakis, P., 2001. Modeling and evaluating product end-of-life options. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (6), 1203-1220. (Pubitemid 35165640)
3. Gerner, S., et al., 2005. Integrated approach for disassembly processes generation and recycling evaluation of an end-of-life product. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (1), 195-222. (Pubitemid 41646835)
4. Gungor, A. and Gupta, S.M., 1997. An evaluation methodology for disassembly processes. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 33 (12), 329-332. (Pubitemid 127404380)
5. Gungor, A. and Gupta, S.M., 2001. Disassembly sequence plan generation using a branch-andbound algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (3), 481-509. (Pubitemid 35170222)
6. Hui, W., Dong, X., and Guanghong, D., 2008. A genetic algorithm for product disassembly sequence planning. Neurocomputing, 71 (13-15), 2720-2726.
7. Johnson, M.R. and Wang, M.H., 1995. Planning product disassembly for material recovery opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (11), 3119-3142.
8. Johnson, M.R. and Wang, M.H., 1998. Economical evaluation of disassembly operations for recycling, remanufacturing and reuse. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (12), 3227-3252. (Pubitemid 128568685)
9. Jun, H.B., et al., 2007. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (18-19), 4573-4594.
10. Kang, J.-G., et al., 2001. Parallel disassembly sequencing with sequence-dependent operation times. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 50 (1), 343-346. (Pubitemid 32610839)
11. Kang, J.-G., et al., 2002. Optimal disassembly sequencing with sequence dependent operation times based on the directed graph of assembly states. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 28 (3), 264-273.
12. Krikke, H.R., van Harten, A., and Schuur, P.C., 1998. On a medium term product recovery and disposal strategy for durable assembly products. International Journal of Production Research, 36 (1), 111-139. (Pubitemid 128553155)
13. Lambert, A.J.D., 1999. Linear programming in disassembly/clustering sequence generation. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 36 (4), 723-738. (Pubitemid 30527317)
14. Lambert, A.J.D., 2003. Disassembly sequencing: a survey. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (16), 3721-3759.
15. Lambert, A.J.D., 2006. Exact methods in optimum disassembly sequence search for problems subject to sequence dependent costs. Omega, 34 (6), 538-549. (Pubitemid 43119084)
16. Lambert, A.J.D., 2007. Optimizing disassembly processes subjected to sequence dependent cost. Computers and Operations Research, 34 (2), 536-551. (Pubitemid 44205372)
17. Lee, D.-H., Kang, J.-G., and Xirouchakis, P., 2001. Disassembly planning and scheduling: review and further research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215 (5), 695-710.
18. Lee, D.-H., Kim, H.-J., and Kim, J.-S., 2008. Reverse logistics: research issues and literature review. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 34 (3), 270-288.
19. Lee, S.G., Lye, S.W., and Khoo, M.K., 2001. A multi-objective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 18 (2), 148-156. (Pubitemid 32914717)
20. Mangun, D. and Thurston, D.L., 2002. Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49 (4), 479-490.
21. O'Shea, B., Grewal, S.S., and Kaebernick, H., 1998. State of the art literature survey on disassembly planning. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 6 (4), 345-357. (Pubitemid 128666535)
22. Penev, K.D. and de Ron, A.J., 1996. Determination of a disassembly strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 34 (2), 495-506. (Pubitemid 126519759)
23. Pnueli, Y. and Zussman, E., 1997. Evaluating the end-of-life value of a product and improving it by redesign. International Journal of Production Research, 35 (4), 921-942. (Pubitemid 127560002)
24. Santochi, M., Dini, G., and Failli, F., 2002. Computer aided disassembly planning: state of the art and perspectives. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 51 (2), 507-529.
25. Teunter, R.H., 2006. Determining optimal disassembly and recovery strategies. Omega, 34 (6), 533-537. (Pubitemid 43119083)
26. Zussman, E. and Zhou, M.C., 2000. Design and implementation an adaptive process planner for disassembly processes. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 16 (2), 171-179.