Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 292-299

  Rauch, Gaiane M ^a   Dogan, Basak E ^a   Smith, Taletha B ^a,b   Liu, Ping ^a   Yang, Wei T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Meridian Imaging   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Breast lesions; MRI guided biopsy; Vacuum assisted biopsy; Women's imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER MORPHOLOGY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMANGIOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VACUUM;

EID: 84862915012     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7594     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215:267-279 (Pubitemid 30190541)
2. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003; 226:773-778 (Pubitemid 36259154)
3. Lehman CD, Demartini W, Anderson BO, Edge SB. Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7:193-201
4. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006; 238:42-53 (Pubitemid 43010579)
5. Carbognin G, Girardi V, Calciolari C, et al. Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 2010; 115: 1234-1245
6. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, et al. MR-directed ("Second-Look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR 2010; 194:370-377
7. Demartini W, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. AJR 2009; 192: 1128-1134
8. Luciani ML, Pediconi F, Telesca M, et al. Incidental enhancing lesions found on preoperative breast MRI: management and role of second-look ultrasound. Radiol Med 2011; 116:886-904
9. Wiratkapun C, Duke D, Nordmann AS, et al. Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2008; 15:618-625 (Pubitemid 351509758)
10. Destounis S, Arieno A, Somerville PA, et al. Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28:1337-1346
11. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR 2009; 193:1025-1029
12. Eby PR, Lehman CD. Magnetic resonance imaging- guided breast interventions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 19:151-162
13. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A, Lebrecht A, Britton PD, Schreer I. Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72:289-294
14. Meeuwis C, Mann RM, Mus RD, et al. MRI-guided breast biopsy at 3T using a dedicated large core biopsy set: feasibility and initial results. Eur J Radiol 2011; 79:257-261
15. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1463-1470 (Pubitemid 36940224)
16. Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, McDonough MD, Demartini WB, Shook J, Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2005; 184:1782-1787 (Pubitemid 40770148)
17. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR 2003; 180:901-910 (Pubitemid 36363023)
18. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Thornton CM, Van Zee KJ, Tan LK. Fast MRI-guided vacuum- assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR 2003; 181:1283-1293 (Pubitemid 37296404)
19. Mahoney MC. Initial clinical experience with a new MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy device. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28:900-905
20. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging- guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 238:54-61 (Pubitemid 43010580)
21. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 2006; 106:982-990
22. Crystal P, Sadaf A, Bukhanov K, McCready D, O'Malley F, Helbich TH. High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted? Eur Radiol 2011; 21:582-589
23. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRIguided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2007; 188:684-690
24. Strigel RM, Eby PR, Demartini WB, et al. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of highrisk lesions initially identified with breast MRI. AJR 2010; 195:792-798
25. Ikeda D, Hylton N, Kuhl CK. BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging, 1st ed. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, eds. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
26. Gebauer B, Bostanjoglo M, Moesta KT, Schneider W, Schlag PM, Felix R. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions with a handheld vacuum biopsy device. Acta Radiol 2006; 47:907-913 (Pubitemid 44673494)
27. Han B-K, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR 2008; 191:1798-1804
28. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, Thornton C, Dershaw DD. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR 2005; 185:183-193
29. Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, et al. Vacuum- assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:1554-1562
30. Perretta T, Pistolese CA, Bolacchi F, Cossu E, Fiaschetti V, Simonetti G. MR imaging-guided 10-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: histological characterisation. Radiol Med (Torino) 2008; 113:830-840
31. Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Suzuki T, et al. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: is it an essential technique? Breast Cancer 2009; 16:121-125
32. Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, et al. Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2007; 189:468-474 (Pubitemid 47195934)
33. Nguyen CV, Albarracin CT, Whitman GJ, Lopez A, Sneige N. Atypical ductal hyperplasia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:752-761
34. Sneige N, Lim SC, Whitman GJ, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum- assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications: considerations for surgical excision. Am J Clin Pathol 2003; 119:248-253 (Pubitemid 37047880)
35. Candelaria R, Fornage BD. Second-look US examination of MR-detected breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2011; 39:115-121