PepDistiller: A quality control tool to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of peptide identifications in shotgun proteomics

Proteomics

Volumn 12, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1720-1725

  Li, Ning ^a   Wu, Songfeng ^a   Zhang, Chengpu ^a   Chang, Cheng ^a   Zhang, Jiyang ^c   Ma, Jie ^a   Li, Liwei ^a   Qian, Xiaohong ^a   Xu, Ping ^a   Zhu, Yunping ^a   He, Fuchu ^a,b  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF RADIATION MEDICINE   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Peptide identification; q value accuracy; Quality control; Shotgun proteomics; Target decoy strategy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; PEPDISTILLER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84862902689     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100167     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Choi, H., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome. Res. 2008, 7, 254-265.
2. Choi, H., Ghosh, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Statistical validation of peptide identifications in large-scale proteomics using the target-decoy database search strategy and flexible mixture modeling. J. Proteome. Res. 2008, 7, 286-292.
3. Zhang, J., Ma, J., Dou, L., Wu, S. et al., Bayesian nonparametric model for the validation of peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8, 547-557.
4. Kall, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S. et al., Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 923-925.
5. Spivak, M., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Kall, L. et al., Improvements to the percolator algorithm for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets. J. Proteome. Res. 2009, 8, 3737-3745.
6. Brosch, M., Yu, L., Hubbard, T., Choudhary, J., Accurate and sensitive peptide identification with Mascot percolator. J. Proteome. Res. 2009, 8, 3176-3181.
7. Ma, J., Zhang, J., Wu, S., Li, D. et al., Improving the sensitivity of Mascot search results validation by combining new features with Bayesian nonparametric model. Proteomics 2010, 10, 4293-4300.
8. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J et al., A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1285-1292.
9. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
10. Ulintz, P. J., Zhu, J., Qin, Z. S., Andrews, P. C., Improved classification of mass spectrometry database search results using newer machine learning approaches. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5, 497-509.
11. Ding, Y., Choi, H., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Adaptive discriminant function analysis and reranking of MS/MS database search results for improved peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome. Res. 2008, 7, 4878-4889.
12. Moore, R. E., Young, M. K., Lee, T. D., Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2002, 13, 378-386.
13. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 207-214.
14. Kall, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., Noble, W. S., Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome. Res. 2008, 7, 29-34.
15. Choi, H., Nesvizhskii, A. I., False discovery rates and related statistical concepts in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome. Res. 2008, 7, 47-50.
16. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Vitek, O., Aebersold, R., Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 787-797.
17. Navarro, P., Vazquez, J., A refined method to calculate false discovery rates for peptide identification using decoy databases. J. Proteome. Res. 2009, 8, 1792-1796.
18. Jung, H.-J., Purvine, S. O., Kim, H., Petyuk, V. A. et al., Integrated post-experiment monoisotopic mass refinement: an integrated approach to accurately assign monoisotopic precursor masses to tandem mass spectrometric data. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 8510-8518.
19. Shen, Y., Tolic, N., Hixson, K. K., Purvine, S. O. et al., Proteome-wide identification of proteins and their modifications with decreased ambiguities and improved false discovery rates using unique sequence tags. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1871-1882.
20. Wang, G., Wu, W. W., Zhang, Z., Masilamani, S. et al., Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 146-159.
21. Granholm, V., Kall, L., Quality assessments of peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1086-1093.
22. Blanco, L., Mead, J. A., Bessant, C., Comparison of novel decoy database designs for optimizing protein identification searches using ABRF sPRG2006 standard MS/MS data sets. J. Proteome. Res. 2009, 8, 1782-1791.
23. Griffin, N. M., Yu, J., Long, F., Oh, P. et al., Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomic analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 83-89.