Zuckerman's revised alternative five-factor model: Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja personality questionnaire in four french-speaking countries

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 358-365

  Rossier, Jérôme ^a   Hansenne, Michel ^b   Baudin, Nicolas ^c   Morizot, Julien ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CANADA; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; SWITZERLAND; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BELGIUM; CANADA; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWITZERLAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862898622     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2012.657024     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allik, J. (2005). Personality dimension across cultures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 212-232.
2. Aluja, A., Garćia, L. F., Cuevas, L.,&Garćia, O. (2007). The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: A comparative study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 58-71. (Pubitemid 46631778)
3. Aluja, A., Garćia, O., & Garćia, L. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-725.
4. Aluja, A., Garćýa, O., Garćýa, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the 'NEO-PI-R' factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879-1889. (Pubitemid 40533987)
5. Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416-431.
6. Aluja, A., Rossier, J., Garćia, L. F., Angleitner, A., Kuhlman, M.,&Zuckerman, M. (2006). A cross-cultural shortened form of the ZKPQ (ZKPQ-50-CC adapted to English, French, German, and Spanish languages. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 619-628. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.03. 001 (Pubitemid 44028713)
7. Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2004). Investigating the ZKPQ-III-R: Psychometric properties, relations to the Five-factor model, and genetic and environmental influences on its scales and facets. In R. M. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 89-105). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
8. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
9. Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805-819. (Pubitemid 128340135)
10. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. New York, NY: Sage.
11. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
12. Church, A. T., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93-114.
13. De Pascalis, V.,&Russo, P.M. (2003). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personalilty Questionnaire: Preliminary results of the Italian version. Psychological Reports, 92, 965-974. (Pubitemid 39110016)
14. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
15. Duarte, M. E., & Rossier, J. (2008). Testing and assessment in an international context: Cross- and multi-cultural issues. In J. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 489-510). New York, NY: Springer Science.
16. Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation on adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
17. Gom̀a-i-Freixanet, M., Valero, S., Punti, J., & Zuckerman, M. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 134-146. (Pubitemid 38670805)
18. Haven, S., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study.Unpublishedmanuscript, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
19. Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309-313.
20. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with crosscultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The referencegroup effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
21. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequence: Comparing values, behaviors, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Lynam, D. R., Smith, G. T., Cyders, M. A., Fischer, S., & Whiteside, S. P. (2007). The UPPS-P questionnaire measure of five disposition to rash action. Unpublished technical report, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
23. Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Muthen, B. O., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
24. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139-153). New York, NY: Guilford.
25. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality traits development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456-1468.
26. M̀uthen, L. K., & M̀uthen, B. O. (2010). Mplus (Version 6.0) [Computer program]. Los Angeles, CA: M̀uthen & M̀uthen.
27. O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
28. Oishi, S.,&Roth, D. P. (2009). The role of self-reports in culture and personality research: It is too early to give up on self-reports. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 107-109.
29. Rigozzi, C., Rossier, J., Dahourou, D., Adjahouisso, M., Ah-Kion, J., Amoussou-Yeye, D., Verardi, S. (2009). A cross-cultural study of the higher-order structures underlying personality disorders in French-speaking Africa and Switzerland. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 175-186.
30. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-Analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25. (Pubitemid 43172350)
31. Rossier, J. (2005). A review of the cross-cultural equivalence of frequently used personality inventories. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5, 175-188. doi:10.1007/s10775-005-8798-rftxt (Pubitemid 41261055)
32. Rossier, J., Aluja, A., Garćia, L. F., Angleitner, A., De Pascalis, V., Wang, W., Zuckerman, M. (2007). The cross-cultural generalizability of Zuckerman's Alternative Five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 188-196. (Pubitemid 47519433)
33. Rossier, J., Dahourou, D., & McCrae, R. R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the Five-factor model and locus of control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 225-248. doi:10.1177/0022022104272903 (Pubitemid 40305975)
34. Rossier, J., Meyer De Stadelhofen, F., & Berthoud, S. (2004). A comparison of the hierarchical structures of the NEO-PI-R and of the 16PF5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 27-38. doi:10.1027//1015-5759. 20.1.27 (Pubitemid 38118544)
35. Rossier, J., Rigozzi, C., Charvoz, L., & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Marital satisfaction: Psychometric properties of the PFB and comparison with the DAS. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 55-63. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.65.1.55 (Pubitemid 43555340)
36. Rossier, J., Rigozzi, C., & Personality Across Culture Research Group. (2008). Personality disorders and the Five-factor model among French speakers in Africa and Europe. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 534-544.
37. Rossier, J., Verardi, S., Massoudi, K., & Aluja, A. (2008). Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) at the domain and facet level in a French-speaking sample. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 8, 203-217.
38. Schmitz, P. G. (2004). On the alternative Five-factor model: Structure and correlates. In R. M. Stelmack (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 65-87). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
39. Spini, D. (2003).Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz value survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 3-23.
40. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
41. Van De Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for crosscultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
43. Verardi, S., Dahourou, D., Ah-Kion, U., Bhowon, U., Ng Tseung, C., Amoussou-Yeye, D., Rossier, J. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale in eight African countries and Switzerland. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 19-34. doi:10.1177/0022022109348918
44. Wrigley, C. C., & Neuhaus, J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418-419.
45. Wu, Y.-X., Wang, W., Du, W.-Y., Li, J., Jiang, X.-F., & Wang, Y.-H. (2000). Development of a Chinese version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Reliabilities and gender/age effects. Social Behaviour and Personality, 28, 241-250.
46. Zuckerman, M. (2002). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 377-396). G̈ottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
47. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.
48. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.
49. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three) robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929-941.