The relation of speech perception to the perception of nonverbal auditory patterns

Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 333-349

  Warren, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925834888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933107     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Bartlett, F. C, & Mark, H. (1922–1923). A note on local fatigue in the auditory system. British Journal of Psychology, 13, 215–218.
2. Bashford, J. A., Jr., Riener, K. R., & Warren, R. M. (1992). Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restoration. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 211–217.
3. Bashford. J. A., Jr., & Warren, R. M. (1987a). Effects of spectral alternation on the intelligibility of words and sentences. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 431–438.
4. Bashford, J. A., Jr., & Warren, R. M. (1987b). Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 114–121.
5. Bashford, J. A., Jr., Warren, R. M., & Brown, C. A. (1996). Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong –bottom-up— cues for phonemic restoration. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 342–350.
6. Bashford, J. A., Jr., Warren, R. M., & Lenz, P. W. (2000). Relative contributions of passband and filter skirts to the intelligibility of bandpass speech: Some effects of context and amplitude. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 1, 31–36.
7. Bashford, J. A., Jr., Warren, R. M., & Lenz, P. W. (2005). Enhancing intelligibility of narrowband speech with out-of-band noise: Evidence for lateral suppression at high-normal intensity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 365–369.
8. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Chalikia, M. H., & Warren, R. M. (1991). Phonemic transformations: Mapping the illusory organization of steady-state vowel sequences. Language and Speech, 34, 109–143.
10. Chalikia, M. H., & Warren, R. M. (1994). Spectral fissioning in phonemic transformations. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 218–226.
11. Cole, R. A., & Scott, B. (1973). Perception of temporal order in speech: The role of vowel transitions. Canadia; Journal of Psychology, 27, 441–449.
12. Cooke, M., Crawford, M., & Green, P. (1994). Learning to recognise speech in noisy environments. In ATR (Advanced Telecommunication Research Institute International). Paper presented at the September 1994 Workshop on a Biological Framework for Speech Perception and Production, Kyoto, Japan.
13. Cullinan, W. L., Erdos, E., Schaefer, R., & Tekieli, M. E. (1977). Perception of temporal order of vowels and consonant-vowel syllables. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 742–751.
14. Denes, P. B., & Pinson, E. N. (1993). The speech chain: The physics and biology of spoken language(2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
15. Efron, R. (1963). Temporal perception, aphasia, and déjà vu. Brain, 86, 403–424.
16. Egan, J. P. (1948a). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope, 58, 955–991.
17. Egan, J. P. (1948b). The effect of noise in one ear upon the loudness of speech in the other. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 58–62.
18. Ellis, D. P. W. (1993). Hierarchic models of hearing for sound separation and reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. Mohonk, NY. Final program and summaries, vol. 17–20, October 1993, 157–160. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
19. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143–165.
20. Flügel, J. C. (1920–1921). On local fatigue in the auditory system. British Journal of Psychology, 11, 105–134.
21. Godsmark, D., & Brown, G. J. (1999). Blackboard architecture for computational auditory scene analysis. Speech Communication, 27, 351–366
22. Hirsh, I. J. (1948a). Binaural summation and interaural inhibition as a function of the level of the masking noise. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 205–213.
23. Hirsh, I. J. (1948b). The influence of interaural phase summation and inhibition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 563–544.
24. Houtgast, T (1972). Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1885–1894.
25. Houtgast, T. (1976). Subharmonic pitches of a pure tone at low S/N ratio. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 405–409.
26. Javel, E. (1986). Basic response properties of auditory fibers. In R. S. Altschuler, R. P. Bobbin, & D. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Neurobiology of hearing: The cochlea(pp. 213–245). New York: Raven.
27. Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliot, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.
28. Kashino, M., & Warren, R. M. (1996). Binaural release from temporal induction. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 899–905.
29. Langmuir, I., Schaefer, V. J., Ferguson, C. V., & Hennelly, E. F. (1944). A study of binaural perception of the direction of a sound source. (OSRD Rpt. No. 4079, Publ. No. 31014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
30. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
31. Miller, G. A., & Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.
32. Miller, J. L., & Jusczyk, P. W (1989). Seeking the neurophysiological basis of speech perception. Cognition, 33, 111–137.
33. Okuno, H. G., Nakatani, T., & Kawabata, T. (1997). Challenge problem: Understanding three simultaneous speakers. In Proceedings ofthe Second Workshop on Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence(Vol. 1, pp. 30–35). Nagoya, Japan. (IJCAI-97), American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
34. Plomp, R. (1981). Perception of sound signals at low signal-to-noise ratio. In D. J. Getty & J. H. Howard (Eds.), Auditory and visual pattern recognition(pp. 27–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Samuel, A. G. (1987). Lexical uniqueness effects on phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 36–56.
36. Samuel, A. G. (1991). A further examination of attentional effects in the phonemic restoration illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 679–699.
37. Samuel, A. G., & Ressler, W. H. (1986). Attention within auditory word perception: Insights from the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 70–79.
38. Shriberg, E. E. (1992). Perceptual restoration of filtered vowels with added noise. Language and Speech, 35, 127–136.
39. Silverman, S. R., & Hirsh, I. J. (1955). Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 64, 1234–1245.
40. Smith, R. L. (1988). Encoding of sound intensity by auditory neurons. In G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.), Auditory function: Neurological bases of hearing(pp. 243–274). New York: Wiley.
41. Thomas, L. B., Hill, P. B., Carroll, E S., & Garcia, B. (1970). Temporal order in the perception of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48, 1010–1013.
42. Thurlow, W. R., & Elfner, L. F. (1959). Continuity effects with alternately sounding tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 1337–1339.
43. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392–393.
44. Warren, R. M. (1972). Perception of temporal order: Special rules for initial and terminal sounds of sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 167.
45. Warren, R. M. (1974a). Auditory pattern discrimination by untrained listeners. Perception and Psychophysics, 15, 495–500.
46. Warren, R. M. (1974b). Auditory temporal discrimination by trained listeners. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 237–256.
47. Warren, R. M. (1981). Modes of representation in production and perception of speech. In T. H. Myers, J. Laver, & J. Anderson (Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech(pp. 34–37). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48. Warren, R. M. (1984). Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 371–383.
49. Warren, R. M. (1999). Auditory perception: A new analysis and synthesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Warren, R. M., & Ackroff, J. M. (1976). Two types of auditory sequence perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 387–394.
51. Warren, R. M., & Bashford, J. A., Jr. (1976). Auditory contralateral induction: An early stage in binaural processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 380–386.
52. Warren, R. M., & Bashford, J. A., Jr. (1993). When acoustic sequences are not perceptual sequences: The global perception of auditory patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 121–126.
53. Warren, R. M., Bashford, J. A., Jr., & Gardner, D. A. (1990). Tweaking the lexicon: Organization of vowel sequences into words. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 423–432.
54. Warren, R. M., Bashford, J. A., Jr., & Healy, E. W. (1992). The subtractive nature of auditory continuity: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2334.
55. Warren, R. M., Bashford, J. A., Jr., Healy, E. W., & Brubaker, B. S. (1994). Auditory induction: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 313–322.
56. Warren, R. M., & Byrnes, D. L. (1975). Temporal discrimination of recycled tonal sequences: Pattern matching and naming of order by untrained listeners. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 273–280.
57. Warren, R. M., Gardner, D. A., Brubaker, B. S., & Bashford, J. A., Jr. (1991). Melodic and nonmelodic sequences of tones: Effects of duration on perception. Music Perception, 8, 272–290.
58. Warren, R. M., Hainsworth, K. R., Brubaker, B. S., Bashford, J. A., Jr., & Healy, E. W. (1997). Spectral restoration of speech: Intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 275–283.
59. Warren, R. M., Healy, E. W., & Chalikia, M. H. (1996). The vowel-sequence illusion: Intersubject stability and intersubject agreement of syllabic forms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2452–2461.
60. Warren, R. M., & Obusek, C. J. (1971). Speech perception and phonemic restorations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 358–362.
61. Warren, R. M., Obusek, C. J., & Ackroff, J. M. (1972). Auditory induction: The perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science, 176, 1149–1151.
62. Warren, R. M., Obusek, C. J., Farmer, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1969). Auditory sequence: Confusions of patterns other than speech or music. Science, 164, 586–587.
63. Warren, R. M., Riener, K. R., Bashford, J. A., Jr., & Brubaker, B. S. (1995). Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 175–182.
64. Warren, R. M., & Sherman, G. L. (1974). Phonemic restorations based on subsequent context. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 150–156.
65. Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1968). Helmholtz on perception: Its physiology and development. New York: Wiley.
66. Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223(12), 30–36.