The where and when of linguistic word-level prosody

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2638-2642

  Arciuli, Joanne ^a   Slowiaczek, Louisa M ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BOWDOIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dichotic listening; Hemispheric specialisation; Linguistic prosody; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; VERBALIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250667074     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arciuli J., and Cupples L. Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech 46 4 (2003) 353-374
2. Arciuli J., and Cupples L. The effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and non-native speakers: Evidence from onset-gating. Memory & Cognition 32 1 (2004) 21-30
3. Arciuli J., and Cupples L. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 5 (2006) 920-948
4. Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (in press). Would you rather 'embert a cudsert' or 'cudsert an embert'? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In A. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental States: Language and Cognitive Structure.
5. Black M., and Chiat S. Noun-verb dissociations: A multifaceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics 16 (2003) 231-250
6. Cutler A. Forebear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech 29 (1986) 201-220
7. Donselaar W., Koster M., and Cutler A. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A 2 (2005) 251-273
8. Eichele T., Nordby H., Rimol L.M., and Hugdahl K. Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Cognitive Brain Research 24 (2005) 405-412
9. Emmorey K. The neurological substrates for prosodic aspects of speech. Brain and Language 30 (1987) 305-320
10. Ferreira F. Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 233-253
11. Gandour J., Dzemidzic M., Wong D., Lowe M., Tong Y., Hsieh L., et al. Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 84 (2003) 318-336
12. Hugdahl K., Bronnick K., Kyllingsbaek S., Law I., Gade A., and Paulson O.B. Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instruments stimuli: A O-PET study. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 431-440
13. Kelly M.H. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 349-364
14. Kelly M.H., and Bock J.K. Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 (1988) 389-403
15. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition 25 (1987) 71-102
16. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: Altmann G.T.M. (Ed). Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 148-172
17. Mattys S., and Samuel A. Implications of stress pattern differences in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language 42 (2000) 571-596
18. McClelland J., and Elman J. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 1-86
19. Monaghan P., Chater N., and Christiansen M.H. The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorisation. Cognition 96 (2005) 143-182
20. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
21. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime reference guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh
22. Sereno J.A. Stress pattern differentiation of form class in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79 (1986) S36
23. Slowiaczek L. Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition. Language and Speech 33 (1990) 47-68
24. Soto-Faraco S., Sebastian-Galles N., and Cutler A. Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language 45 (2001) 412-432
25. Swerts M., and Geluykens R. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech 37 (1994) 21-43
26. Thomsen T., Rimol L., Ersland L., and Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening reveals functional specificity in prefrontal cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 211-218
27. Van Lancker D., and Sidtis J. The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects: All errors are not created equal. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35 (1992) 963-970
28. Vanlancker-Sidtis D. When only the right hemisphere is left: Studies in language and communication. Brain and Language 91 (2004) 199-211
29. Vosse T., and Kempen G. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition 75 (2000) 105-143
30. Walker J., Daigle T., and Buzzard M. Hemispheric specialisation in processing prosodic structures: Revisited. Aphasiology 16 12 (2002) 1155-1172
31. Weintraub S., Mesulam M., and Kramer L. Disturbances in prosody: A right-hemisphere contribution to language. Archives of Neurology 38 (1981) 742-744
32. Wexler B. Dichotic presentation as a method for single hemisphere simulation studies. In: Hugdahl K. (Ed). Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (1988), John Wiley & Sons, Great Britain
33. Wingfield A., Lindfield K., and Goodglass H. Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 43 (2000) 915-925