Distress calls in tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor): Are conspecifics or predators the target?

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 854-862

  Branch, Carrie L ^a   Freeberg, Todd M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

alarm call; chick a dee call; distress call; motivation structural rules; Paridae; protean defense; tufted titmouse

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ALARM SIGNAL; CONSPECIFIC; MOBBING; PREDATOR; PREY CAPTURE; PREY SIZE; SONGBIRD; TRAP (EQUIPMENT);

AVES; BAEOLOPHUS BICOLOR; PARIDAE; PARUS BICOLOR; PROTEA;

EID: 84862867235     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars041     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Akcxay C, Tom ME, Homes D, Campbell SE, Beecher MD. 2011. Sing softly and carry a big stick: signals of aggressive intent in the song sparrow. Anim Behav. 82:377-382.
2. Araya-Ajoy Y-m, Chavez-Campos J, Kalko EKV, DeWoody JA. 2009. High-pitched notes during vocal contests signal genetic diversity in ocellated antbirds. PLoS One. 4(12):e8137.
3. August PV, Anderson JGT. 1987. Mammal sounds and motivationstructural rules: a test of hypothesis. J Mammal. 68:1-9.
4. Baker MC, Becker AM. 2002. Mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees: effects of urgency on call production. Wilson Bull. 114:510-516. (Pubitemid 36770554)
5. Ballentine B, Searcy WA, Nowicki S. 2008. Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Anim Behav. 75:693-703.
6. Bartmess-LeVasseur J, Branch CL, Browning SA, Owens JL, Freeberg TM. 2010. Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and whitebreasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 64:1187-1198.
7. Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL. 2009. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav. 77:771-783.
8. Blumstein DT. 2007. The evolution, function, and meaning of marmot alarm communication. Adv Study Behav. 37:371-401.
9. Blumstein DT, Armitage KB. 1997. Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? A comparative test with grounddwelling sciurid alarm calls. Am Nat. 150:179-200. (Pubitemid 27433815)
10. Brackbill H. 1970. Tufted titmouse breeding behavior. Auk. 87:522-536.
11. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer.
12. Byrne R, Whiten A, editors. 1988. Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Caro T. 2005. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
14. Clucas BA, Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2004. Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57:187-196. (Pubitemid 40047533)
15. Compton LA, Clarke JA, Seidensticker J, Ingrisano DR. 2001. Acoustic characteristics of white-nosed coati vocalizations: a test of motivationstructural rules. J Mammal. 82:1054-1058. (Pubitemid 33146170)
16. Conover MR. 1994. Stimuli eliciting distress calls in adult passerines and response of predators and birds to their broadcast. Behaviour. 131:19-37.
17. Conover WJ. 1999. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Courter JR, Ritchison G. 2010. Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat. Behav Ecol. 21:936-942.
19. Dobson SD. 2009. Socioecological correlates of facial mobility in nonhuman anthropoids. Am J Phys Anthropol. 139:413-420.
20. Driver PM, Humphries DA. 1969. The significance of the highintensity alarm cal in captured passerines. Ibis. 111:243-244.
21. Ekman J. 1989. Ecology of non-breeding social systems of Parus. Wilson Bull. 101:263-288.
22. Ficken MS, Hailman ED, Hailman JP. 1994. The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican chickadee. Condor. 96:70-82. (Pubitemid 2044937)
23. Freeberg TM. 2008. Complexity in the chick-a-dee call of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis): associations of context and signaler behavior to call structure. Auk. 125:896-907.
24. Freeberg TM, Dunbar RIM, Ord TJ. Forthcoming. Social complexity as a proximate and ultimate factor in communicative complexity. Phil Trans R Soc B. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0213.
25. Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2002. Receivers respond differently to chick-adee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Anim Behav. 63:837-845. (Pubitemid 34749785)
26. Gaddis P. 1979. A comparative analysis of the vocal communication systems of the Carolina chickadee and the tufted titmouse [dissertation]. Gainesville (FL): University of Florida. p. 96.
27. Grubb TC, Pravosudov VV. 1994. Tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor). In: Poole A, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America, No. 86. Philadelphia (PA): The Academy of Natural Sciences. p. 1-16.
28. Haftorn S. 1999. Calls by willow tits (Parus montanus) during ringing and after release. J Ornithol. 140:51-56. (Pubitemid 29298363)
29. Hailman JP. 1989. The organization of the major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bull. 101:305-343.
30. Hailman JP, Ficken MS. 1996. Comparative analysis of vocal repertoires, with reference to chickadees. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, editors. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca (NY): Comstock Publishing Associates of Cambridge University Press. p. 136-159.
31. Hailman JP, Ficken MS, Ficken RW. 1985. The 'chick-a-dee' calls of Parus atricapillus: a recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica. 56:191-224.
32. Harrap S, Quinn D. 1995. Chickadees, tits, nuthatches & treecreepers. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
33. Hauser MD. 1993. The evolution of nonhuman primate vocalizations: effects of phylogeny, body weight, and social context. Am Nat. 142: 528-542.
34. Hill GE. 1986. The function of distress calls given by tufted titmice (Parus bicolor): an experimental approach. Anim Behav. 34:590-598.
35. Hof D, Hazlett N. 2010. Low-amplitude song predicts attack in a North American wood warbler. Anim Behav. 80:821-828.
36. Högstedt G. 1983. Adaptation unto death: function of fear screams. Am Nat. 121:562-570. (Pubitemid 14272163)
37. Humphries DA, Driver PM. 1970. Protean defence by prey animals. Oecologia. 5:285-302.
38. Jones KJ, Hill WL. 2001. Auditory perception of hawks and owls for passerine alarm calls. Ethology. 107:717-726. (Pubitemid 32812051)
39. Langham GM, Contreras TA, Sieving KE. 2006. Why pishing works: titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities. Ecoscience. 13:485-496. (Pubitemid 46111521)
40. Laskey AR. 1957. Some tufted titmouse life history. Bird-Banding. 28:135-145.
41. Lessells CM, Boag PT. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk. 104:116-121.
42. Lucas JR, Freeberg TM. 2007. "Information" and the chick-a-dee call: communicating with a complex vocal system. In: Otter KA, editor. Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 199-213.
43. Mager JN, Walcott C, Piper WH. 2007. Male common loons, Gavis immer, communicate body mass and condition through dominant frequencies of territorial yodels. Anim Behav. 73:683-690. (Pubitemid 46497970)
44. Mahurin EJ, Freeberg TM. 2009. Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food. Behav Ecol. 20:111-116.
45. Marler P. 1955. Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature. 176: 6-8.
46. Marler P. 2004. Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H, editors. Nature's music: the science of birdsong. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 132-177.
47. McComb K, Semple S. 2005. Coevolution of vocal communication and sociality in primates. Biol Lett. 1:381-385. (Pubitemid 41796574)
48. Molnár C, Pongrácz P, Mikló si A. 2010. Seeing with ears: sightless humans' perception of dog bark provides a test for structural rules in vocal communication. Q J Exp Psychol. 63:1004-1013.
49. Morton ES. 1977. On the occurrence and significance of motivationstructural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat. 111: 855-869.
50. Nolen MT, Lucas JR. 2009. Asymmetries in mobbing behaviour and correlated intensity during predator mobbing by nuthatches, chickadees and titmice. Anim Behav. 77:1137-1146.
51. Owens JL, Freeberg TM. 2007. Variation in chick-a-dee calls of tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor: note type and individual distinctiveness. J Acoust Soc Am. 122:1216-1226. (Pubitemid 47205519)
52. Owings DH, Morton ES. 1998. Animal vocal communication: a new approach. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
53. Perrone M Jr. 1980. Factors affecting the incidence of distress calls in passerines. Wilson Bull. 92:404-408.
54. Schmidt KA, Lee E, Ostfeld RS, Sieving K. 2008. Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls. Behav Ecol. 19:759-763. (Pubitemid 352019881)
55. Shelley EL, Blumstein DT. 2004. The evolution of vocal alarm communication in rodents. Behav Ecol. 16:169-177.
56. Sieving KE, Hetrick SA, Avery ML. 2010. The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication. Oikos. 199:264-276.
57. Smith ST. 1972. Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis. Cambridge (MA): Nuttall Ornithological Club, Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 11:1-125.
58. Smith SM. 1991. The black-capped chickadee: behavioral ecology and natural history. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.
59. Soard CM, Ritchison G. 2009. 'Chick-a-dee' calls of Carolina chickadees convey information about degree of threat posed by avian predators. Anim Behav. 78:1447-1453.
60. Sturdy CB, Bloomfield LL, Charrier I, Lee TT-Y. 2007. Chickadee vocal production and perception: an integrative approach to understanding acoustic communication. In: Otter KA, editor. Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 153-166.
61. Templeton CN, Greene E. 2007. Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:5479-5482. (Pubitemid 47175705)
62. Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. 2005. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science. 308:1934-1937. (Pubitemid 40941881)
63. Whiten A, Byrne RW, editors. 1997. Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
64. Zachau CE, Freeberg TM. Forthcoming. Chick-a-dee call variation in the context of 'flying' avian predator stimuli: a field study of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol.