Asymmetries in mobbing behaviour and correlated intensity during predator mobbing by nuthatches, chickadees and titmice

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1137-1146

  Nolen, Mark T ^a   Lucas, Jeffrey R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

antipredator; Baeolophus bicolor; Carolina chickadee; mobbing; Poecile carolinensis; Sitta carolinensis; sociality; tufted titmouse; vocal communication; white breasted nuthatch

Indexed keywords

ALARM SIGNAL; ASYMMETRY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MOBBING; PASSERINE; VOCALIZATION;

AVES; BAEOLOPHUS BICOLOR; MEGASCOPS ASIO; PARIDAE; PARUS BICOLOR; PARUS CAROLINENSIS; SITTA CAROLINENSIS; SITTIDAE; STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 64549119509     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Altmann S.A. Avian mobbing behavior and predator recognition. Condor 58 (1956) 241-253
2. Bell H.L. Composition and seasonaility of mixed-species feeding flocks of insectivorous birds in the Australian Capital Territory. Emu 80 (1980) 227-232
3. Berner T.O., and Grubb T.C. An experimental analysis of mixed-species flocking in birds of deciduous woodland. Ecology 66 (1985) 1229-1236
4. Betts M.G., Hadley A.S., and Doran P.J. Avian mobbing response is restricted by territory boundaries: experimental evidence from two species of forest warblers. Ethology 111 (2005) 821-835
5. Bloomfield L.L., Phillmore L.S., Weisman R.G., and Sturdy C.B. Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. III: the chick-a-dee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 83 (2005) 820-833
6. Brumm H. Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 192 (2006) 1279-1285
7. Bshary R., and Noe R. Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators. Animal Behaviour 54 (1997) 1461-1474 10.1006/anbe.1997.0553
8. Caro T.M. Antipredator Defences in Birds and Mammals (2005), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
9. Curio E. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 48 (1978) 175-183
10. Curio E., and Regelmann K. The behavioural dynamics of great tits (Parus major) approaching a predator. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 69 (1985) 3-18
11. Curio E., and Regelmann K. Predator harassment implies a real deadly risk: a reply to Hennessy. Ethology 72 (1986) 75-78
12. Curio E., Ernst U., and Vieth W. Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: one function of mobbing. Science 202 (1978) 899-901
13. Deppe C., Holt D., Tewksbury J., Broberg L., Petersen J., and Wood K. Effect of northern pygmy-owl (Glaucidium gnoma) eyespots on avian mobbing. Auk 120 (2003) 765-771
14. Diamond J.M. Mixed-species foraging groups. Nature 292 (1981) 408-409
15. Diamond J.M. Flocks of brown and black New Guinean birds: a bi-colored mixed-species foraging association. Emu 87 (1987) 201-211
16. Dolby A.S., and Grubb T.C. Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Animal Behaviour 56 (1998) 501-509 10.1006/anbe.1998.0808
17. Dolby A.S., and Grubb T.C. Functional roles in mixed-species foraging flocks: a field manipulation. Auk 116 (1999) 557-559
18. Fichtel C. Reciprocal recognition of sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) and red-fronted lemur (Eulemur fulvus rufus) alarm calls. Animal Cognition 7 (2004) 45-52
19. Ficken M.S. Are mobbing calls of Steller's jays a confusion chorus. Journal of Field Ornithology 60 (1989) 52-55
20. Ficken M.S. Call similarities among mixed species flock associates. Southwestern Naturalist 45 (2000) 154-158
21. Ficken M.S., and Popp J. A comparative analysis of passerine mobbing calls. Auk 113 (1996) 370-380
22. Ficken M.S., and Witkin S.R. Responses of black-capped chickadees flocks to predators. Auk 94 (1977) 156-157
23. Fitzgibbon C.D. Mixed-species grouping in Thomson's and Grant's gazelles: the antipredator benefits. Animal Behaviour 39 (1990) 1116-1126 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80784-5
24. Flasskamp A. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 5. An experimental test of the move on hypothesis. Ethology 96 (1994) 322-333
25. Forsman J.T., and Mönkkönen M. Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing call playbacks under varying predation risk. Animal Behaviour 62 (2001) 1067-1073 10.1006/anbe.2001.1856
26. Frankenberg E. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 4. Alerting others and perception advertisement in blackbirds facing an owl. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 55 (1981) 97-118
27. Gaddis P. Mixed flocks, accipiters, and antipredator behavior. Condor 82 (1980) 348-349
28. Gehlbach F.R. The Eastern Screech Owl: Life History, Ecology, and Behavior in the Suburbs and Countryside (1994), Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas
29. Gehlbach F.R., and Leverett J.S. Mobbing of eastern screech-owls: predatory cues, risk to mobbers and degree of threat. Condor 97 (1995) 831-834
30. Goodale E., and Kotagama S.W. Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species bird flocks. Auk 122 (2005) 108-120
31. Goodale E., and Kotagama S.W. Testing the roles of species in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21 (2005) 669-676
32. Goodale E., and Kotagama S.W. Context-dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273 (2006) 875-880
33. Goodale E., and Kotagama S.W. Vocal mimicry by a passerine bird attracts other species involved in mixed-species flocks. Animal Behaviour 72 (2006) 471-477 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.02.004
34. Goodale E., and Kotagama S.W. Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. Behavioral Ecology 19 (2008) 887-894
35. Greenberg R. Birds of many feathers: the formation and structure of mixed-species flocks of forest birds. In: Bionski S., and Garber P.A. (Eds). On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups (2000), University of Chicago Press, Chicago 521-558
36. Greig-Smith P.W. The formation, structure and function of mixed-species insectivorous bird flocks in West African savanna woodland. Ibis 120 (1978) 284-295
37. Grubb T.C., and Pravosudov V.V. White-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis). In: Poole A. (Ed). The Birds of North America Online. No. 54 (1993), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/054 10.2173/bna.54 The Birds of North America Online
38. Grubb T.C., and Pravosudov V.V. Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). In: Poole A. (Ed). The Birds of North America Online. No. 86 (1994), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/086 10.2173/bna.86 The Birds of North America Online
39. Hauser M.D. How infant vervet monkeys learn to recognize starling alarm calls - the role of experience. Behaviour 105 (1988) 187-201
40. Hendrichsen D.K., Christiansen P., Nielson E.K., Dabelsteen T., and Sunde P. Exposure affects the risk of an owl being mobbed: experimental evidence. Journal of Avian Biology 37 (2006) 13-18
41. Holt D.W., and Petersen J.L. Northern pygmy-owl (Glaucidium gnoma). In: Poole A. (Ed). The Birds of North America. No. 494 (2000), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/494 10.2173/bna.494 The Birds of North America Online
42. Hurd C.R. Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38 (1996) 287-292
43. Jullien M., and Thiollay J.M. Multi-species territoriality and dynamics of neotropical forest understory bird flocks. Journal of Animal Ecology 67 (1998) 227-252
44. Klump G.M., and Shalter M.D. Acoustic behavior of birds and mammals in the predator context.1. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. 2. The functional-significance and evolution of alarm signals. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 66 (1984) 189-226
45. Kostan K.M. Evolution of mutualistic interspecific communication: assessment and management across species. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116 (2002) 206-209
46. Krama T., and Krams I. Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behavioral Ecology 16 (2005) 37-40
47. Krams I. Communication in crested tits and the risk of predation. Animal Behaviour 61 (2001) 1065-1068 10:1006/anbe.2001.1702
48. Krams I., and Krama T. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269 (2002) 2345-2350
49. Krams I., Krama T., Igaune K., and Mand R. Long-lasting mobbing of the pied flycatcher increases the risk of nest predation. Behavioral Ecology 18 (2007) 1082-1084
50. Krams I., Krama T., Igaune K., and Mand R. Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62 (2008) 599-605
51. Latimer W. Comparative study of songs and alarms of some Parus species. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 45 (1977) 414-433
52. Lea A.J., Barrera J.P., Tom L.M., and Blumstein D.T. Heterospecific eavesdropping in a nonsocial species. Behavioral Ecology 19 (2008) 1041-1046
53. Lima S.L. Vigilance and foraging substrate: antipredatory considerations in a nonstandard environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30 (1992) 283-289
54. Lucas J.R., and Freeberg T.M. "Information" and the chick-a-dee call: communication with a complex vocal system. In: Otter K. (Ed). Ecology and Behavior of Chickadees and Titmice: an Integrated Approach (2007), Oxford University Press, New York 199-209
55. Lucas J.R., Freeberg T.M., Krishnan A., and Long G.R. A comparative study of avian auditory brainstem responses: correlations with phylogeny and vocal complexity, and seasonal effects. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 188 (2002) 981-992
56. Lucas J.R., Freeberg T.M., Long G.R., and Krishnan A. Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 193 (2007) 201-215
57. McPherson R.J. Mobbing responses of some passerines to the calls and location of the screech owl. Journal of Raptor Research 15 (1981) 23-30
58. Magrath R.D., Pitcher B.J., and Gardner J.L. A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other's aerial alarm calls. Behavioral Ecology 18 (2007) 944-951
59. Marler P. Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176 (1955) 6-8
60. Morse D.H. Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecological Monographs 40 (1970) 119-168
61. Morse D.H. Interactions between tit flocks and sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. Ibis 115 (1973) 591-593
62. Morse D.H. Feeding and avoidance behavior in heterospecific groups. Bioscience 27 (1977) 331-339
63. Mostrom A.M., Curry R.L., and Lohr B. Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). In: Poole A. (Ed). The Birds of North America Online. No. 636 (2002), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/636 10.2173/bna.636
64. Moynihan M. The organization and probable evolution of some mixed-species flocks of neotropical birds. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 143 (1962) 1-140
65. Munn C.A. Birds of a different feather also flock together. Natural History 93 (1984) 34-35
66. Munn C.A. Permanent canopy and understory flocks in Amazonia: species composition and population density. Ornithological Monographs 36 (1985) 683-712
67. Munn C.A. Birds that 'cry wolf'. Nature 319 (1986) 143-145
68. Munn C.A., and Terborgh J.W. Multi-species territoriality in neotropical foraging flocks. Condor 81 (1979) 338-347
69. Nocedal J., and Ficken M.S. Bridled titmouse (Baeolophus wollweberi). In: Poole A. (Ed). The Birds of North America Online. No. 375 (1998), Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/375 10.2173/bna.375
70. Oda R., and Masataka N. Interspecific responses of ring-tailed lemurs to playback of antipredator alarm calls given by Verreaux's sifakas. Ethology 102 (1996) 441-453
71. Offutt G.C. Behavior of the tufted titmouse before and during the nesting season. Wilson Bulletin 77 (1965) 382-387
72. Olendorf R., Getty T., and Scribner K. Cooperative nest defence in red-winged blackbirds: reciprocal altruism, kinship or by-product mutualism?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271 (2004) 177-182
73. Owens J.L., and Freeberg T.M. Variation in chick-a-dee calls of tufted titmice. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (2007) 1216-1226
74. Pavey C.R., and Smyth A.K. Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of the powerful owls, Ninox strenua. Animal Behaviour 55 (1998) 313-318 10.1006/anbe.1997.0633
75. Pettifor R.A. The effects of avian mobbing on a potential predator, the European kestrel, Falco tinnunculus. Animal Behaviour 39 (1990) 821-827 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80945-5
76. Phelps S.M., Rand A.S., and Ryan M.J. The mixed-species chorus as public information: tungara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific. Behavioral Ecology 18 (2007) 108-114
77. Pius S.M., and Leberg P.L. The protector species hypothesis: do black skimmers find refuge from predators in gull-billed tern colonies?. Ethology 104 (1998) 273-284
78. Planque R., and Slabberkoorn H. Spectral overlap in songs and temporal avoidance in a Peruvian bird assemblage. Ethology 114 (2008) 262-271
79. Poiani A., and Yorke M. Predator harassment: more evidence on the deadly risk. Ethology 83 (1989) 167-169
80. Rainey H.J., Zuberbühler K., and Slater P.J.B. Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 271 (2004) 755-759
81. Ramakrishnan U., and Coss R.G. Recognition of heterospecific alarm vocalizations by bonnet macaques (Macaca radiate). Journal of Comparative Psychology 114 (2000) 3-12
82. Rasa O.A.E. Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru Desert, Kenya. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12 (1983) 181-190
83. Ridley A.R., Child M.F., and Bell M.B.V. Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird. Biology Letters 3 (2007) 589-591
84. Shier D.M. Overview: for crying out loud-dangers and opportunities of communicating in the public domain. Journal of Comparative Psychology 116 (2002) 194-196
85. Shriner W.M. Yellow-bellied marmot and golden-mantled ground squirrel responses to heterospecific alarm calls. Animal Behaviour 55 (1998) 529-536 10.1006/anbe.1997.0623
86. Sieving K.E., Contreras T.A., and Maute K.L. Heterospecific facilitation of forest boundary crossing by mobbing understory birds in north-central Florida. Auk 121 (2004) 738-751
87. Smith N.G. Provoked release of mobbing: a hunting technique of Micrastur falcons. Ibis 111 (1969) 241-242
88. Sordahl T.A. The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior: an anecdotal review. Wilson Bulletin 102 (1990) 349-352
89. Sullivan K.A. Information exploitation by downy woodpeckers in mixed-species flocks. Behaviour 91 (1984) 294-311
90. Sunde P., Bolstad M.S., and Desfor K.B. Diurnal exposure as a risk sensitive behaviour in tawny owls Strix aluco?. Journal of Avian Biology 34 (2003) 409-418
91. Templeton C.N., and Greene E. Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 104 (2007) 5479-5482
92. Templeton C.N., Greene E., and Davis K. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308 (2005) 1934-1937
93. Turcotte Y., and Desrochers A. Playbacks of mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees help estimate the abundance of forest birds in winter. Journal of Field Ornithology 73 (2002) 303-307
94. Vieth W., Curio E., and Ernst U. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 3. Cultural transmission of enemy recognition in blackbirds: cross-species tutoring and properties of learning. Animal Behaviour 28 (1980) 1217-1229 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80110-2
95. Zuberbühler K. Interspecies semantic communication in two forest primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267 (2000) 713-718