Alarm calls of tufted titmice convey information about predator size and threat

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 936-942

  Courter, Jason R ^a   Ritchison, Gary ^a  

^a EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

alarm calls; call characteristics; mobbing; predation risk; predator size

Indexed keywords

ALARM SIGNAL; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BODY SIZE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MOBBING; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR; RAPTOR; SONGBIRD;

AVES; BAEOLOPHUS BICOLOR; BUTEO JAMAICENSIS; MEGASCOPS ASIO; PARIDAE; PARUS ATRICAPILLUS; PARUS BICOLOR; RAPTORES; STRIGIFORMES;

EID: 77955870219     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq086     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allen AA. 1924. A contribution to the life history and economic status of the screech owl (Otus asio). Auk. 41:1-16.
2. Arnold K, Zuberbuhler K. 2006. The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini. Anim Behav. 72:643-653.
3. Baker MC, Becker AM. 2002. Mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees: effects of urgency on call production. Wilson Bull. 114: 510-516.
4. Bergstrom CT, Lachmann M. 2001. Alarm calls as costly signals of antipredator vigilance: the watchful babbler game. Anim Behav. 61:535-543.
5. Bildstein KL. 1982. Responses of northern harriers to mobbing passerines. J Field Ornithol. 53:7-14.
6. Botham MS, Hayward RK, Morrell LJ, Croft DP Jr. 2008. Risk-sensitive antipredator behavior in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulate. Ecology. 89:3174-3185.
7. Bump G, Darrow RW, Edminster FC, Crissey WF. 1947. The ruffed grouse. life history, propagation, management. Buffalo (NY): Hol-ling Press, Inc.
8. Cimprich DA, Grubb TC. 1994. Consequences for Carolina chickadees of foraging with tufted titmice in winter. Ecology. 75: 1615-1625.
9. Clark WS, Wheeler BK. 2001. A field guide to hawks of North America. 2nd ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
10. Clucas BA, Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2004. Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 57:187-196.
11. Dial KP, Greene E, Irschick DJ. 2008. Allometry of behavior. Trends Ecol Evol. 23:394-401.
12. Dunning JB Jr. 1993. CRC handbook of avian body masses. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
13. Frederiksen JK, Slobodchikoff CN. 2007. Referential specificity in the alarm calls of the black-tailed prairie dog. Ethol Ecol Evol. 19:87-99.
14. Freeberg TM, Lucas JR. 2002. Receivers respond differently to chick-a-dee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees, Poecile carolinensis. Anim Behav. 63:837-845.
15. Gaddis P. 1980. Mixed flocks, accipiters, and antipredator behavior. Condor. 82:348-349.
16. Gehlbach FR. 1995. Eastern screech-owl (Megascops asio). In: Poole A, editor. The birds of North America online [Internet]. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online; [cited 2007 November 1]. Available from: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/165.
17. Goodale E, Kotagama SW. 2005. Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species bird flocks. Auk. 122:108-120.
18. Goodale E, Kotagama SW. 2008. Response to conspecific and hetero-specific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. Behav Ecol. 19:887-894.
19. Griesser M. 2008. Referential calls signal predator behavior in a group-living bird species. Curr Biol. 18:69-73.
20. Grubb TC. 1998. Tufted titmouse. Mechanicsburg (PA): Stackpole Books.
21. Grubb TC, Pravosudov VV. 1994. Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). In: Poole A, editor. The birds of North America online. Ithaca (NY): Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online; [cited 2009 October 12]. Available from:,http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/086.
22. Haftorn S. 1999. Contexts and possible functions of alarm calling in the willow tit, (Parus montanus); the principle of "better safe than sorry.". Behaviour. 137:437-439.
23. Hailman JP. 1989. The organization of major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bull. 101:305-343.
24. Henry KS, Lucas JR. 2008. Coevolution of auditory sensitivity and temporal resolution with acoustic signal space in three songbirds. Anim Behav. 76:1659-1671.
25. Hill GE. 1986. The function of distress calls given by tufted titmice (Parus bicolor). Anim Behav. 34:590-598.
26. Houston CS, Smith DG, Rohner C. 1998. Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus). In: Poole A, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America. No.372. Philadelphia (PA): Academy of Natural Sciences.
27. Hurd CR. 1996. Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38: 287-292.
28. Kirchhof J, Hammerschmidt K. 2006. Functionally referential alarm calls in tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax): evidence from playback experiments. Ethology. 112:346-354.
29. Krama T, Krams I, Igaune K. 2008. Effects of cover on loud trill-call and soft seet-call use in the crested tit (Parus cristatus). Ethology. 114:656-661.
30. Kullberg C, Lind L. 2002. An experimental study of predator recognition in great tit fledglings. Ethology. 108:429-441.
31. Lange H, Leimar O. 2004. Social stability and daily body mass gain in great tits. Behav Ecol. 15:549-554.
32. Langham GM, Contreras TA, Sieving KE. 2006. Why pishing works: titmouse (Paridae) scolds elicit a generalized response in bird communities. Ecoscience. 13:485-496.
33. Lea AJ, Barrera JP, Tom LM, Blumstein DT. 2008. Heterospecific eavesdropping in a nonsocial species. Behav Ecol. 19:1041-1046.
34. Lind J, Jongren F, Nilsson J, Alm DS, Strandmark A. 2005. Information, predation risk and foraging decisions during mobbing in great tits Parus major. Ornis Fenn. 82:89-96.
35. Lucas JR, Freeberg TM. 2007. Information and the chick-a-dee call: communicating with a complex vocal system. In: Otter K, editor. Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 199-215.
36. Manser MB, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. 2002. Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends Cogn Sci. 6:55-57.
37. Owens JL, Freeberg TM. 2007. Variation in chick-a-dee calls of tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor: note type and individual distinctiveness. J Acoust Soc Am. 122:1216-1226.
38. Pavey CR, Smyth AK. 1998. Effects of avian mobbing on roost use and diet of powerful owls, Ninox strenua. Anim Behav. 55:313-318.
39. Pereira ME, Macedonia JM. 1991. Ring-tailed lemur antipredator calls denote predator class, but not response urgency. Anim Behav. 41:543-544.
40. Pettifor RA. 1990. The effects of avian mobbing on a potential predator, the European kestrel, Falco tinnunculus. Anim Behav. 39: 821-827.
41. Pyle P. 1997. Identification guide to North American birds. Pt. 1: Columbidae to Ploceidae. Bolinas (CA): Slate Creek Press.
42. Ritchison G, Cavanagh PM. 1992. Prey use by eastern screech-owls: seasonal variation in central Kentucky and a review of previous studies. J Raptor Res. 26:66-73.
43. Roth TC. 2006. The spatial and behavioral ecology of sharp-shinned (Accipiter striatus) and Cooper's hawks (A. cooperii): a large-scale perspective on the small-bird in-winter paradigm [dissertation]. Terre Haute (IN)]: Indiana State University.
44. Roth TC, Lima SL. 2007. The predatory behavior of wintering Accipiter hawks: temporal patterns in activity of predators and prey. Oecolo-gia. 152:169-178.
45. Roth TC, Vetter WE, Lima SL. 2008. Spatial ecology of wintering Accipiter hawks: home range, habitat use, and the influence of bird feeders. Condor. 110:260-268.
46. SAS Institute. 2002-2004. SAS 9.1.3 help and documentation. Cary (NC): SAS Institute.
47. Schmidt KA, Lee E, Ostfeld RS, Sieving K. 2008. Eastern chipmunks increase their perception of predation risk in response to titmouse alarm calls. Behav Ecol. 19:759-763.
48. Schmidt KA, Ostfeld RS. 2008. Eavesdropping squirrels reduce their future value of food under the perceived presence of cache robbers. Am Nat. 171:386-393.
49. Shedd DH. 1982. Seasonal variation and function of mobbing and related antipredator behaviors of the American robin (Turdus mi-gratorius). Auk. 99:342-346.
50. Sieving KE, Hetrick SA, Avery ML. 2010. The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication. Oikos. 119:264-276.
51. Smith ST. 1972. Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis. Cambridge (MA): Publication no. 11. Nuttall Ornithological Club. p. 1-125.
52. Soard C. 2008. Variation in the "chick-a-dee" call of Carolina chickadees conveys information about avian predators [thesis]. [Richmond (KY)]: Eastern Kentucky University. p. 1-37.
53. Templeton CN, Greene E. 2007. Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls. Proc Natl Acad Sci\USA. 104:5479-5482.
54. Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. 2005. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science. 308:1934-1937.
55. Welbergen JA, Davies NB. 2008. Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav. 76:811-882.