Sing softly and carry a big stick: Signals of aggressive intent in the song sparrow

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 377-382

  Akçay, Çaĝlar ^a   Tom, Mari E ^a   Holmes, Dylan ^b   Campbell, S Elizabeth ^a   Beecher, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b OBERLIN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Eavesdropping; Honest signalling; Melospiza melodia soft song; Song sparrow; Type matching

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; AMPLITUDE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESEARCH WORK; SIGNAL; SONG; SONGBIRD;

MELOSPIZA; MELOSPIZA MELODIA;

EID: 79960564559     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akçay Ç, Reed V.A., Campbell S.E., Templeton C.N., Beecher M.D. Indirect reciprocity: song sparrows distrust aggressive neighbours based on eavesdropping. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:1041-1047. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.009.
2. Anderson R.C., Nowicki S., Searcy W.A. Soft song in song sparrows: response of males and females to an enigmatic signal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2007, 61:1267-1274.
3. Anderson R.C., Searcy W.A., Peters S., Nowicki S. Soft song in song sparrows: acoustic structure and implications for signal function. Ethology 2008, 114:662-676.
4. Ballentine B., Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:693-703.
5. Beecher M.D., Campbell S.E., Stoddard P.K. Correlation of song learning and territory establishment strategies in the song sparrow. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1994, 91:1450-1454.
6. Brumm H., Ritschard M. Song amplitude affects territorial aggression of male receivers in chaffinches. Behavioral Ecology 2011, published online 20 January 2011, doi:10.1093/beheco/arq205.
7. Brumm H., Robertson K.A., Nemeth E. Singing direction as a tool to investigate the function of birdsong: an experiment on sedge warblers. Animal Behaviour 2011, 81:653-659. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.12.015.
8. Burt J.M., Campbell S.E., Beecher M.D. Song type matching as threat: a test using interactive playback. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1163-1170.
9. Capp M.S., Searcy W.A. Acoustical communication of aggressive intentions by territorial male bobolinks. Behavioral Ecology 1991, 2:319-326.
10. Dabelsteen T., McGregor P.K., Lampe H.M., Langmore N.E., Holland J. Quiet song in birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 1998, 9:80-105.
11. Dawkins R., Krebs J.R. Animal signals: information or manipulation?. Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach 1978, 282-309. Blackwell, Oxford. J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.).
12. Goller F., Mallinckrodt M.J., Torti S.D. Beak gape dynamics during song in zebra finch. Journal of Neurobiology 2004, 59:289-303.
13. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1990, 144:517-546.
14. Hoese W.J., Podos J., Boetticher N.C., Nowicki S. Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. Journal of Experimental Biology 2000, 203:1845-1855.
15. Hof D., Hazlett N. Low amplitude song predicts attack in a North American wood warbler. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:821-828. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.07.017.
16. Johnstone R.A. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2001, 98:9177-9180.
17. Johnstone R.A., Bshary R. Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:1917-1922.
18. Kroodsma D.E. The effect of large song repertoires on neighbor 'recognition' in male song sparrows. Condor 1976, 78:97-99.
19. Laidre M.E. How often do animals lie about their intentions? An experimental test. American Naturalist 2009, 173:337-346.
20. Laidre M.E., Vehrencamp S.L. Is bird song a reliable signal of aggressive intent?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2008, 62:1207-1211.
21. Lessells C.M., Boag P.T. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 1987, 104:116-121.
22. Logue D.M., Abiola I.O., Rains D., Bailey N.W., Zuk M., Cade W.H. Does signalling mitigate the cost of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song. Proceedings of Royal Society B 2010, 27:2571-2575. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0421.
23. McGregor P.K. Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1993, 340:237-244.
24. McGregor P.K. Animal Communication Networks 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Maynard Smith J., Harper D. Animal Signals 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Nakagawa S., Cuthill I.C. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 2007, 82:591-605.
27. Nice M.M. Studies in the life history of the song sparrow II. The behavior of the song sparrow and other passerines. Transactions of the Linnean Society of New York 1943, 6:1-328.
28. Otte D. Effects and functions in the evolution of signaling systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1974, 5:385-417.
29. Peake T.M. Eavesdropping in communication networks. Animal Communication Networks 2005, 13-37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.K. McGregor (Ed.).
30. Searcy W.A., Beecher M.D. Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:1281-1292.
31. Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. The Evolution of Animal Communication 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
32. Searcy W.A., Nowicki S. Signal interception and the use of soft song in aggressive interactions. Ethology 2006, 112:865-872.
33. Searcy W.A., Nowicki S., Hogan C. Song type variants and aggressive context. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2000, 48:358-363.
34. Searcy W.A., McArthur P.D., Peters S.S., Marler P. Response of male song and swamp sparrows to neighbour, stranger, and self songs. Behaviour 1982, 77:152-163.
35. Searcy W.A., Anderson R.C., Nowicki S. Bird song as a signal of aggressive intent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2006, 60:234-241.
36. Searcy W.A., Anderson R.C., Nowicki S. Is bird song a reliable signal of aggressive intent? A reply. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2008, 62:1213-1216.
37. Vehrencamp S.L. Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2001, 268:1637-1642.
38. Waas J.R. Do little blue penguins signal their intentions during aggressive interactions with strangers. Animal Behaviour 1991, 41:375-382.
39. Weeden J.S., Falls J.B. Differential responses of male ovenbirds to recorded songs of neighboring and more distant individuals. Auk 1959, 76:343-351.
40. Williams H. Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch. Journal of Experimental Biology 2001, 204:3497-3506.
41. Wilson P.L., Vehrencamp S.L. A test of the deceptive mimicry hypothesis in song-sharing song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 2001, 62:1197-1205.
42. Wingfield J.C., Hahn T.P. Testosterone and territorial behaviour in sedentary and migratory sparrows. Animal Behaviour 1994, 47:77-89.
43. Zahavi A. Mate selection: a selection for handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1975, 53:205-214.
44. Zahavi A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977, 67:603-605.
45. Zahavi A. Why shouting?. American Naturalist 1979, 113:155-156.