Implementing musculoskeletal outcome assessments in clinical practice

Haemophilia

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL.4, 2012, Pages 120-124

  Feldman, B M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Haemophilia; Musculoskeletal; Outcome assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE SCORE IN HEMOPHILIA; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HEMOPHILIA; HEMOPHILIA ACTIVITIES LIST; HUMAN; IPSG HEMOPHILIA JOINT HEALTH SCORE; MENTAL HEALTH; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT RIGHT; PEDIATRIC HEMOPHILIA ACTIVITIES LIST; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEALTH STATUS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 84862860569     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02836.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mosby's Medical Dictionary. 8th Edition. Available at Accessed February 23, 2012.
2. Frommer M, Rubin G, Lyle D. The NSW Health Outcomes Program. N S W Public Health Bull 1992; 3: 135-7.
3. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Ontario: Doubleday Canada, 2011.
4. World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. 1948.
5. Gafni A, Charles C, Whelan T. The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 347-54.
6. Evanoff B, Potter P, Wolf L, Grayson D, Dunagan C, Boxerman S. Can We Talk? Priorities for patient care differed among health care providers. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI eds. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 1: Research Findings) AHRQ publication 05-0021-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2005.
7. Beeton K, Feldman B, Muldar K, Poonnoose P, van der Net J, Young N. Compendium of Assessment Tools. 2011. Available at
8. Feldman BM, Funk S, Lundin B et al. Musculoskeletal measurement tools from the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG). Haemophilia 2008; 14: 162-9.
9. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop 1980; 153-9.
10. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Hemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59: 287-305.
11. Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS et al. Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 109-15.
12. Doria AS, Babyn PS, Lundin B et al. Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of haemophilic knees and ankles of haemophilic children. Expert MRI working group of the international prophylaxis study group. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 503-13.
13. Doria AS, Lundin B, Miller S et al. Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of elbows in haemophilic children. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 303-14.
14. Doria AS. State-of-the-art imaging techniques for the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy: present and future. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 107-14.
15. Pettersson H, Gilbert MS. Classification of the hemophilic arthropathy. In: Pettersson H, Gilbert MS, eds. Diagnostic imaging in hemophilia. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 56-68.
16. Feldman BM, Funk SM, Bergstrom BM et al. Validation of a new pediatric joint scoring system from the International Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study Group: validity of the hemophilia joint health score. Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: 223-30.
17. Hilliard P, Funk S, Zourikian N et al. Hemophilia joint health score reliability study. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 518-25.
18. Poonnoose PM, Manigandan C, Thomas R et al. Functional Independence Score in haemophilia: a new performance-based instrument to measure disability. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 598-602.
19. Van Genderen FR, van Meeteren NL, van der Bom JG et al. Functional consequences of haemophilia in adults: the development of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 565-71.
20. van Genderen FR, Westers P, Heijnen L et al. Measuring patients' perceptions on their functional abilities: validation of the Haemophilia Activities List. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 36-46.
21. Groen WG, van der Net J, Helders PJ, Fischer K. Development and preliminary testing of a Paediatric Version of the Haemophilia Activities List (pedhal). Haemophilia 2010; 16: 281-9.
22. Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2009; 90: S22-35.
23. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H, Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005; 59: 569-76.
24. Bradley CS, Bullinger M, McCusker PJ, Wakefield CD, Blanchette VS, Young NL. Comparing two measures of quality of life for children with haemophilia: the CHO-KLAT and the Haemo-QoL. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 643-53.
25. Young NL, Bradley CS, Blanchette V et al. Development of a health-related quality of life measure for boys with haemophilia: the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes - Kids Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT). Haemophilia 2004; 10: 34-43.
26. Young NL, Bradley CS, Wakefield CD, Barnard D, Blanchette VS, McCusker PJ. How well does the Canadian Haemophilia Outcomes-Kids' Life Assessment Tool (CHO-KLAT) measure the quality of life of boys with haemophilia? Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006; 47: 305-11.
27. Bullinger M, von Mackensen S, Fischer K et al. Pilot testing of the 'Haemo-QoL' quality of life questionnaire for haemophiliac children in six European countries. Haemophilia 2002; 8: 47-54.
28. von Mackensen S, Bullinger M. Development and testing of an instrument to assess the Quality of Life of Children with Haemophilia in Europe (Haemo-QoL). Haemophilia 2004; 10: 17-25.
29. Rentz A, Flood E, Butler R et al. Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool for adults with haemophilia (the HAEMO-SYM). Haemophilia 2009; 15: 1039-47.
30. Mercan A, Sarper N, Inanir M et al. Hemophilia-specific quality of life index (Haemo-QoL and Haem-A-QoL questionnaires) of children and adults: result of a single center from Turkey. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010; 27: 449-61.
31. von Mackensen S, Czepa D, Herbsleb M, Hilberg T. Development and validation of a new questionnaire for the assessment of subjective physical performance in adult patients with haemophilia--the HEP-Test-Q. Haemophilia 2010; 16: 170-8.
32. Remor E, Arranz P, Quintana M et al. Psychometric field study of the new haemophilia quality of life questionnaire for adults: the 'Hemofilia-QoL'. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 603-10.
33. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 401-16.
34. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R. Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 559-68.
35. Lindsay K, Ibrahim G, Sokoll K, Tripathi M, Melsom RD, Helliwell PS. The composite DAS Score is impractical to use in daily practice: evidence that physicians use the objective component of the DAS in decision making.J Clin Rheumatol 2009; 15: 223-5.
36. Choy EH, Khoshaba B, Cooper D, MacGregor A, Scott DL. Development and validation of a patient-based disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis that can be used in clinical trials and routine practice. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 192-9.
37. Long AF, Dixon P. Monitoring outcomes in routine practice: defining appropriate measurement criteria. J Eval Clin Pract 1996; 2: 71-8.
38. Padankatti SM, Macaden AS, Cherian SM et al. A patient-prioritized ability assessment in haemophilia: the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 605-11.