Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 631-638

  Saarijärvi, Hannu ^a   Kuusela, Hannu ^a   Spence, Mark T ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Pairwise comparison method; Supplier relations; Supply chain strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862648791     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.031     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Al-Mudimigh A.S., Zairi M., Ahmed A.M.M. Extending the concept of supply chain: The effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Economics 2004, 87(3):309-320.
2. Andrews K.R. New horizons in corporate strategy. McKinsey Quarterly 1971, 7(3):34-43.
3. Choo E.U., Wedley W.C. A common framework for deriving preference values from pair-wise comparison matrices. Computers and Operations Research 2004, 31(6):893-908.
4. Christiansen T., Berry W.L., Bruun P., Ward P. A mapping of competitive priorities, manufacturing practices, and operational performance in groups of Danish manufacturing companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2003, 23(10):1163-1183.
5. Christopher M., Gattorna J. Supply chain cost management and value-based pricing. Industrial Marketing Management 2005, 34(2):115-121.
6. Corsten D., Kumar N. Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. Journal of Marketing 2005, 69(3):80-94.
7. Fisher M.L. What is the right supply chain for your product?. Harvard Business Review 1997, 75(2):105-116.
8. Gattorna J. Living supply chains 2006, Pearson Education Limited, Dorchester.
9. Greis N.P., Kasarda J.D. Enterprise logistics in the information era. California Management Review 1997, 39(3):55-78.
10. Gunasekaran A. TQM in supply chain management. The TQM Magazine 2003, 15(6):361-363.
11. Gunasekaran A., Patel C., Tirtiroglu E. Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2001, 21(1):71-87.
12. Harker P.T., Vargas L.G. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 1987, 33(11):1383-1403.
13. Johnson G., Scholes K., Whittington R. Exploring corporate strategy 2006, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
14. Ketchen D.J., Hult T.M. Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 2007, 25(2):573-580.
15. Kim Y.P., Yoon C.H., Yun D.K. Determining customer-oriented technical importance ratings: An evaluative study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2005, 22(4):393-409.
16. Lai V.S., Wong B.K., Cheung W. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 137(1):134-144.
17. Lambert D.M., Cooper B.K. Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management 2000, 29(1):65-83.
18. Matthyssens P., Vandenbempt K., Berghman L. Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe. Industrial Marketing Management 2006, 35(6):751-761.
19. McCarter M.W., Northcraft G.B. Happy together? Insights and implications of viewing managed supply chains as a social dilemma. Journal of Operations Management 2007, 25(2):498-511.
20. Morash E.A. Supply chain strategies, capabilities, and performance. Transportation Journal 2001, 41(1):37-54.
21. Ogden J.A., Petersen K.J., Carter J.R., Monczka R.M. Supply management strategies for the future: A delphi study. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 2005, 41(3):29-48.
22. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
23. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process series VI 1994, RWS publication, Pittsburgh.
24. Saaty T.L. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 2003, 145(1):431-446.
25. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
26. Sahay B.S. Supply chain collaboration: The key to value creation. Work Study 2003, 52(2):76-83.
27. Schnetzler M.J., Sennheiser A., Schönsleben P. A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy. International Journal of Production Economics 2007, 105(1):21-42.
28. Searcy D.L. Aligning the balanced scorecard and a firm's strategy using the analytic hierarchy process. Management Accounting Quarterly 2004, 5(4):1-10.
29. Skinner W. Manufacturing - missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 1969, 47(3):136-145.
30. Spekman R.E., Kamauff J.W., Muhr N. An empirical investigation into supply chain management: A perspective on partnerships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1998, 28(8):630-650.
31. Swafford P.M., Ghosh S., Murthy N.N. A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Productions Management 2006, 25(2):118-140.
32. Swink M., Narasimhan R., Kim S.W. Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: Effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market-based performance. Decision Sciences 2005, 35(3):427-457.
33. Takala J., Leskinen J., Sivusuo H., Hirvelä J. The sand cone model: Illustrating multi-focused strategies. Management Decision 2006, 44(3):335-345.
34. Tan K.C., Kannan V.R., Handfield R.B., Ghosh S. Supply chain management: An empirical study of its impact on performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 1999, 19(10):1034-1052.
35. Treacy M., Wiersema F. Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review 1995, 71(1):84-93.
36. Tummala R.V.M., Phillips C.L.M., Johnson M. Assessing supply chain management success factors. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 2006, 11(2):179-192.
37. Van Horne C., Frayer J.-M., Poulin D. Creating value with innovation: From centre of expertise to the forest products industry. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8(7):751-761.
38. Ward P.T., McCreery J.K., Ritzman L.P., Sharma D. Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences 1998, 29(4):1035-1046.
39. Wind Y., Saaty T.L. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 1980, 26(7):641-658.
40. Zahedi F. The analytic hierarchy process - A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 1986, 16(4):96-108.
41. Zeshui X., Cuiping W. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 1999, 116(2):443-449.