Validation of engineering design alternative selection methods

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 103-120

  Hazelrigg, George A ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision theory; Engineering design

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

ENGINEERING DESIGN;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 0037620650     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305215031000097059     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arrow, K. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons.
2. Barzilai, J. (1998). Measurement foundations for preference function modeling. Proc. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, 11-14.
3. Barzilai, J. (1998). Understanding hierarchical processes. Proc. 1998 National Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, Virginia Beach, VA.
4. de Borda, J.-C. (1781). Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutin. Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences. Translated by Alfred de Grazia as "Mathematical Derivation of an Election System". Isis, 44(1&2), 1953, 42-51.
5. Bernoulli, D. (1738). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk, (Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis). Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Tomus, V. Reprinted In: Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility Theory: A Book of Readings. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1968.
6. Bryne, D. and Taguchi, S. (1986). The Taguchi approach to parameter design. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions, Anaheim, CA, 168.
7. Carroll, L. (1865). Alice in Wonderland.
8. Clausing, D. (1994). Total Quality Development: A Step-by-Step Guide to World Class Concurrent Engineering. ASME Press, New York.
9. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical physics (The indifference curve). Reprinted In: Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility Theory: A Book of Readings. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1968.
10. Ellsburg, D. (1954). "Classic and current notions of Measurable Utility". Economic Journal, LXIV, 528-556.
11. Hauser, J. (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May/June, 63-73.
12. Hazelrigg, G. (1996). Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
13. Hazelrigg, G. (1996). The implications of Arrow's impossibility theorem on approaches to optimal engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 118, 161-164.
14. Hazelrigg, G. (1998). A framework for decision-based engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120, 653-658.
15. Howard, R. (1976). Readings in Decision Analysis. SRI Decision Analysis Group, Menlo Park, CA.
16. Howard, R. (1992). In praise of the old time religion. In: Edwards, W. (Ed.), Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
17. Howard, R. (1997). The Foundations of Professional Decisions Analysis, A Collection of Readings and Manuscript and Projection Notes. Class notes, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
18. Messac, A. (1996). Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA Journal, 34(1), 149-158.
19. Mazur, G. (1991). Getting the voice of the customer. Transactions of the Third Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, Novi, MI, USA. pp. 85-92.
20. Pareto, V. (1927). Manuel D'Economie Politique (Ophélimité). Manuel D'Economie Politique, 2nd ed. Reprinted In: Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility Theory: A Book of Readings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1968.
21. Pugh, S. (1991). Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Workingham, UK.
22. Pugh, S. (1996). Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
23. Saari, D. (1994). Geometry of Voting. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
24. Saari, D. (1995). A chaotic exploration of aggregation paradoxes. SIAM Review, 37(1), 37-52.
25. Saari, D. (1999). Explaining all three-alternative voting outcomes. Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 313-355.
26. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill.
27. Suh, N. (1990). The Principles of Design. Oxford University Press, NY.
28. Taguchi, G. (1986). Introduction to Quality Engineering. Asian Productivity Organization (Distributed by American Supplier Institute Inc., Dearborn, MI).
29. Taguchi, G. and Clausing, D. (1990). Robust quality. Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb, 65-75.
30. Taguchi, G. (1993). Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream. ASME Press, New York.
31. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S. and Taguchi, S. (2000). Robust Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York.
32. Terninko, J. (1996). Step by Step QFD: Customer Driven Product Design. Responsible Management Inc., Nottingham, NH.
33. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953). The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. Chipman, J. S., Hurwich, L., Richter, M. K. and Sonnenschein, H. F. (1971). Preferences, Utility, and Demand. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
35. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationneldevant le risque: Critique des postulats et axioms de l'école américaine. Econometrica, 21, 503-546.