R2KS: A novel measure for comparing gene expression based on ranked gene lists

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 766-775

  Ni, Shengyu ^a,b   Vingron, Martin ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

algorithms; computational molecular biology; gene expression; sequence analysis; statistics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84862583367     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0026     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Boulesteix, A.L., and Slawski, M. 2009. Stability and aggregation of ranked gene lists. Brief Bioinform. 10, 556.
2. Eden, E., Lipson, D., Yogev, S., et al. 2007. Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences. PLoS Comp. Biol. 3, e39.
3. Ein-Dor, L., Zuk, O., and Domany, E., 2006. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5923.
4. Fasano, G., and Franceschini, A. 1987. A multidimensional version of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 225, 155-170.
5. Fury, W., Batliwalla, F., Gregersen, P.K., et al. 2006. Overlapping probabilities of top ranking gene lists, hypergeometric distribution, and stringency of gene selection criterion. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.
6. Hughes, T.R., Marton, M.J., Jones, A.R., et al. 2000. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102, 109-126.
7. Jacso, P. 2005. Visualizing overlap and rank differences among web-wide search engines. Online Inform. Rev. 29, 554-560.
8. Jurman, G., Merler, S., Barla, A., et al. 2008. Algebraic stability indicators for ranked lists in molecular profiling. Bioinformatics 24, 258.
9. Lamb, J., Crawford, E.D., Peck, D., et al. 2006. The connectivity map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 313, 1929-1935.
10. Lottaz, C., Yang, X., Scheid, S., et al. 2006. OrderedList-a bioconductor package for detecting similarity in ordered gene lists. Bioinformatics 22, 2315.
11. Peacock, JA. 1983. Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in astronomy. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 202, 615-627.
12. Qiu, X., Xiao, Y., Gordon, A., et al. 2006. Assessing stability of gene selection in microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinform. 7, 50.
13. Roider, H.G., Manke, T., O'Keeffe, S., et al. 2009. PASTAA: identifying transcription factors associated with sets of co-regulated genes. Bioinformatics 25, 435.
14. Su, A.I., Wiltshire, T., Batalov, S., et al. 2004. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6062.
15. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V.K., et al. 2005. Gene set enrichment analysis: knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545-15550.
16. Wang, E.T., Sandberg, R., Luo, S., et al. 2008. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456 470-476.
17. Yang, X., Bentink, S., Scheid, S., et al. 2006. Similarities of ordered gene lists. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 4, 693.
18. Zucknick, M., Richardson, S., and Stronach, E.A. 2008. Comparing the characteristics of gene expression profiles derived by univariate and multivariate classification methods. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 7, article 7.