Examination of the performance of different pointwise linear regression progression criteria to detect glaucomatous visual field change

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  De Moraes, Carlos G ^a,b   Liebmann, Craig A ^a   Susanna Jr, Remo ^d   Ritch, Robert ^a,c   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Progression; Rate; Trend analysis; Visual field

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREND STUDY; VISUAL FIELD;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84862578455     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02680.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman DS. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 1137-42.
2. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3873-9.
3. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Chauhan BC etal. A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1557-65.
4. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D etal. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 40-8.
5. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ etal. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 569-73.
6. Casas-Llera P, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ etal. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1576-9.
7. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L etal. Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 1965-72.
8. Miglior S, Torri V, Zeyen T etal. Intercurrent factors associated with the development of open-angle glaucoma in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 266-75.
9. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR etal. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 200-7.
10. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130: 429-40.
11. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD etal. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 714-20.
12. De Moraes CG, Prata TS, Liebmann CA etal. Spatially-consistent, localized visual field loss precedes and follows disc hemorrhage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 4727-33.
13. Ahrlich KG, De Moraes CG, Teng CC etal. Visual field progression differences between normal-tension and exfoliative high-tension glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1458-63.
14. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL etal. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1627-35.
15. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2. Br J Ophthalmol 1997; 81: 1037-42.
16. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1544-9.
17. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW etal. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1809-15.
18. Strouthidis NG, Scott A, Peter NM etal. Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 2904-10.
19. Membrey WL, Poinoosawmy DP, Bunce C etal. Comparison of visual field progression in patients with normal pressure glaucoma between eyes with and without visual field loss that threatens fixation. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 1154-8.
20. De Moraes CG, Prata TS, Tello C etal. Glaucoma with early visual field loss affecting both hemifields and the risk of disease progression. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1129-34.
21. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN etal. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 217-22.
22. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM etal. Rates of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 908-15.
23. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1400-7.
24. Fitzke FW, Crabb DP, McNaught AI etal. Image processing of computerised visual field data. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 207-12.
25. Spry PG, Bates AB, Johnson CA etal. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 2192-200.
26. Strouthidis NG, Scott A, Viswanathan AC etal. Monitoring glaucomatous visual field progression: the effect of a novel spatial filter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 251-7.
27. Gardiner SK, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW etal. Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter. Vision Res 2004; 44: 839-48.
28. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry, 2nd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1999.
29. See JL, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC. Rates of neuroretinal rim and peripapillary atrophy area change: a comparative study of glaucoma patients and normal controls. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 840-7.
30. Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1610-15.
31. Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L etal. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2271-6.
32. Caprioli J, Mock D, Bitrian E etal. A method to measure and predict rates of regional visual field decay in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 4765-73.