Social network profiles as information sources for adolescents' offline relations

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 290-295

  Courtois, Cédric ^a   All, Anissa ^a   Vanwynsberghe, Hadewijch ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRIENDS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84862570373     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0557     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Liu H. Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 13:252-275.
2. Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society 2008; 10:393-411.
3. Frozzi G, Mazzoni E. On the importance of social network sites in the transitions which characterize 'emerging adulthood'. ICS Transactions on e-Education and e-Learning 2011; 11:1-11.
4. Back MD, Stopfer JM, Vazier S, et al. Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science 2010; 21:372-374.
5. Bumgarner BA. You have been poked: exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday 2007; 11. http://firstmonday. org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2026
6. Park N, Kee KF, Valenzuela S. Being immersed in social networking environment: facebook groups, uses and gratifications and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2009; 12:729-733.
7. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratification theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:169-174. (Pubitemid 351555927)
8. Antheunis ML, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Getting acquainted through social network sites: testing a model of uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:100-109.
9. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook "Friends": social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1143-1168.
10. Subrahmanyam K, Reich SM, Waechter N, et al. Online and offline social networks: use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008; 29:420-433.
11. Pfeil U, Arjan R, Zaphiris P. Age Differences in online social networking-a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in Myspace. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:643-654.
12. Poulin F, Chan A. Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review 2010; 30:257-272.
13. Cross JR, Fletcher KL. The challenge of adolescent crowd research: defining the crowd. Journal of Youth Adolescence 2009; 38:747-764.
14. Giodano PC. Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology 2003; 29:257-281.
15. Knobloch LK, Solomon DH. Information seeking beyond initial interaction. Human Communication Research 2006; 28:243-257.
16. Berger CR, Calabrese RJ. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research 1975; 1:99-112.
17. Westerman D, Van Der Heide B, Klein KA, et al. How do people really seek information about others?: information seeking across Internet and traditional communication channels. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2008; 13:751-767.
18. Bauminger N, Finzi-Dottan R, Chason S, et al. Intimacy in adolescent friendship: the roles of attachment, coherence, and self-disclosure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2008; 25:409-428.
19. Harvey JH, Omarzu J. Minding the close relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1997; 1:222-239.
20. Collins NL, Miller LC. Self-disclosure and liking: a metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin 1994; 116:457-475.
21. Rubin KH, Bukowski W, Parker JG. (1998) Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Damon W, Eisenberg N, eds. Handbook of child psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3, pp. 619-700.
22. Greca AML, Lopez N. Social anxiety among adolescents: linkages between peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1997; 26:83-94. (Pubitemid 28249056)
23. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten A. Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2005; 8:423-430. (Pubitemid 41540926)
24. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology 2007; 43:267-277.
25. Schneider BH. An observational study of the interactions ofsocially withdrawn/anxious early adolescents and their friends. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2009; 50:799-806.
26. Clatterbuck GW. Attributational confidence and uncertainty in initial interaction. Human Communication Research 1979; 5:147-157.
27. Parks MR, Floyd K. Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication 1996; 46:80-97.
28. Mattick RP, Christopher C. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1998; 36:455-470. (Pubitemid 28256919)
29. Harman HH. (1976) Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1983; 1:201-233.
31. Putnam RD. (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32. Turkle S. (2011). Alone together. New York: Basic Books.