Environmental knowledge and deliberative democracy

Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 159-182

  Pellizzoni, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Deliberative democracy; Knowledge; Risk; Science policy relationship; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862494927     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Andersen I, Jäger B (1999) Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Sci Public Policy 26(5):331-340
2. Angell M (2000) Is academic medicine for sale? New Engl J Med 342(20):1516-1518
3. Beck U (1992) Risk society. Sage, London
4. Boyle J (2003) The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law Contemp Probl 66(1-2):34-75
5. Bradford-Hill A (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295-300
6. Buchanan A (1996) Choosing who will be disabled: genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion. Soc Philos Policy 13(2):18-46
7. Bush V (1945) Science - the endless frontier. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
8. Cefaï D (2002) Qu'est-ce qu'une arène publique: Quelques pistes pour une approche pragmatiste. In: CEFAÏ D, Joseph I (eds) L'héritage du Pragmatisme. Editions de l'Aube, La Tour d'Aigues, pp 52-81
9. Cranor C (1993) Science courts, evidentiary procedures and mixed science-policy decisions. Risk Issues Health Saf 4:113-132
10. Dahl R (1971) Polyarchy. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
11. Dewey J (1927) The public and its problems. Holt, New York
12. Dupuy JP, Grinbaum A (2004) Living with uncertainty: Toward the ongoing normative assessment of nanotechnology. Techné 8(2):4-25
13. EEA (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Eur Environ Agency, Copenhagen
14. Elster J (1995 Strategic Uses of Argument. In: ARROW K (ed) Barriers to conflict resolution. Norton, New York, pp 236-257
15. Elster J (1998) Introduction. In: ELSTER J (ed) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1-18
16. Eurobarometer (2005) Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer Special Survey 224, Brussels Eurobarometer (2005) Social values, science and technology. Eurobarometer Special Survey 225, Brussels
17. European Commission (1999) Liability for defective products. Green Paper, COM(1999) 396
18. European Commission (2000) Science, society and citizens in Europe. SEC(2000)1973
19. Felt U, Wynne B (eds) (2007) Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
20. Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B (1991) Getting to yes. Penguin Books, New York
21. Fishkin J (1997) The voice of the people. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
22. Forrester I, Hanekamp J (2006) Precaution, science and jurisprudence: A test case. J Risk Res 9(4):297-311
23. Franzosi R (1998) Narrative analysis - or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Ann Rev Soc 24:517-554
24. Freudenburg W, Gramling R, Davidson DJ (2008) Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): Science and the politics of doubt. Soc Inquiry 78(1):2-38
25. Frey B (1997) Not just for the money. Elgar, Cheltenham
26. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739-755
27. Gastil J, Levine P (eds) (2005) The deliberative democracy handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
28. Goodin R (2000) Democratic deliberation within. Philos Public Aff 29(1):79-107
29. Gross M (2007) The unknown in process. Dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Curr Sociol 55(5):742-759
30. Guston D (2000) Between politics and science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Habermas J (1992) Between facts and norms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
32. Hacking I (1975) The emergence of probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
33. Hammond K (1996) Human judgement and social policy. Oxford University Press, New York
34. Heath J (2001) Communicative action and rational choice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
35. Held D (1996) Models of democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge
36. Irwin A (1995 Citizen science. Routledge, London
37. Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36(2):299-320
38. Irwin A, Wynne B (1996) Introduction. In: Irwin A, Wynne B (eds) Misunderstanding science? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1-17
39. Jasanoff S (2004) The Idiom of co-production. In: Jasanoff S (ed) States of knowledge. Routledge, London, pp 1-12
40. Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
41. Jefferson Center (2004) Citizens' jury handbook. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.jeffersoncenter. Org
42. Joss S, Durant J (eds) (1995 Public participation in science. the role of consensus conferences. Science Museum, London
43. Keynes JM (1921) A treatise on probability. MacMillan, London
44. Knight F (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, Boston, MA
45. Latour B (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit Inquiry 30(2):225-248
46. Luhmann N (1993) Risk. A sociological theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
47. MacFarlane A (2003) Underlying Yucca Mountain: the interplay of geology and policy in nuclear waste disposal. Soc Stud Sci 33(5):783-807
48. Majone G (2002) What price safety? The precautionary principle and its policy implications. J Common Mark Stud 40(1):89-109
49. Metlay D (2000) From tin roof to torn wet blanket: Predicting and observing groundwater movement at a proposed nuclear waste site. In: Sarewitz D, Pielke R, Byerly R (eds) Prediction. Science, decision making, and the future of nature. Island Press, Covelo, CA, pp 199-228
50. Millstone E, van Zwanenberg P, Marris C, Levidow L, Torgersen E (2004) Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. European Commission, DG JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville
51. Neutra R, DelPizzo V, Lee G (2002) Introduction. In: The Risk Evaluation. Final Report, California State EMF Program. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ehib/emf/ RiskEvaluation/riskeval/Chapter1.pdf
52. Neutra R, DelPizzo V, Lee G (2002) Policy options in the face of possible risks from power frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Final Report, California State EMF Program. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.dhs.ca. gov/ehib/emf/RiskEvaluation/PolicyOptionsF.pdf
53. Noelle-Neumann E. 1984 Spiral of Silence University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
54. Noelle-Neumann E (1984) The spiral of silence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL O'Malley P (2004) Risk, uncertainty and governance. Glasshouse Press, London
55. Oreskes N (2000) Why predict? Perspectives on Prediction in Earth Sciences. In: SAREWITZ D, Pielke R, Byerly R (eds) Prediction. Science, decision making, and the future of nature. Island Press, Covelo, CA, pp 23-40
56. Pantaleo G, Wicklund R (2000) Multiple perspectives: Social performance beyond the single criterion. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 31:231-242
57. Pellizzoni L (2003) Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environ Values 12(2):195-224
58. Pellizzoni L (2009) Revolution or passing fashion? Reassessing the precautionary principle. Int J Risk Assess Manage 12(1):14-34
59. Pellizzoni L (2009) Risk and responsibility in a manufactured world. Sci Eng Ethics DOI 10.1007/s11948-009-9173-
60. Pielke R (2007) The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
61. Price D (1965) The scientific estate. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
62. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
63. Reddy S (1996) Claims to expert knowledge and the subversion of democracy: The triumph of risk over uncertainty. Econ Soc 25(2):222-254
64. Rosenberg S (ed) (2007) Deliberation, participation and democracy. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
65. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385-403
66. Savage L (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
67. Schwartz S, Carpenter K (1999) The right answers for the wrong questions: Consequences of type III error for public health research. Am J Pub Health 89(8):1175-1180
68. Shapin S, Schaffer S (1985) Leviathan and the air pump: HOBBES, Boyle and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
69. Smith G, Wales C (2000) Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy. Polit Stud 48(1):51-65
70. Stengers I (1997) Sciences et pouvoirs. Faut-il en avoir peur? Labor, Bruxelles
71. Stewart T (2000) Uncertainty, Judgment, and Error in Prediction. In: Sarewitz D, Pielke R, Byerly R (eds) Prediction. Science, decision making, and the future of nature. Island Press, Covelo, CA, pp 41-57
72. Sugden R (1995 A theory of focal points. Econ J 105:533-550
73. Sunstein C (2003) The law of group polarization. In: FISHKIN J, Laslett P (eds) Debating deliberative democracy. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 80-101
74. Weber M (1958) Politics as Vocation. In: Gerth H, Mills CW (eds) From Max Weber. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 77-128
75. Weinberg A (1972) Science and trans-science. Minerva 10:209-222
76. Weingart P (2003) Paradoxes of Scientific Advising. In: Bechmann G, Hronszky I (eds) Expertise and its interfaces. Edition Sigma, Berlin, pp 53-89
77. Wiener J, Rogers M (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. J Risk Res 5(4):317-349
78. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning. Glob Environ Change 6(2):111-127
79. Wynne B (2001) Creating public alienation: expert discourses of risk and ethics on GMOs. Sci Cul 10:1-40
80. Wynne B (2007) Risky Delusions: MISUNDERSTANDING Science and Misperforming Publics in the GE Crops Issue. In: Taylor I (ed) Genetically engineered crops: INTERIM policies, uncertain legislation. Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY, pp 341-370
81. Zehr S (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9(1):85-103