Revolution or passing fashion? Reassessing the precautionary principle

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 14-34

  Pellizzoni, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Disenchantment of science.; Division of labour; European social model; knowledge; Narrative; Politics; Power; Precaution; Risk; Science; Social solidarity; Transatlantic divide; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849163532     PISSN: 14668297     EISSN: 17415241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJRAM.2009.024127     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bauman, Z. (2004) Europe, Polity Press, Cambridge.
2. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society, Sage, London.
3. Boudon, R. (2003) 'Beyond rational choice theory', Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 29, pp. 1-21.
4. Boyle, J. (2003) 'The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain', Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 66, Nos. 1-2, pp.34-75.
5. Bush, V. (1945) Science - the Endless Frontier, Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
6. Christoforou, T. (2004) 'The precautionary principle, risk assessment, and the comparative role of science in the European Community and the US legal systems', in N. Vig and M. Faure (Eds.): Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, pp. 17-51, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Cranor, C. (1993) 'Science courts, evidentiary procedures and mixed science-policy decisions', Risk-Issues in Health and Safety, Vol. 4, pp.113-132.
9. De Marchi, B. (2003) 'Public participation and risk governance', Science and Public Policy, Vol.30, No. 3, pp. 171-176.
10. DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell (1983) 'The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields', American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp.147-60.
11. Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame, Routledge, London,
12. Durkheim, E. (1893) De la Division du Travail Social, Alcan, Paris.
13. Easton, D. (1965) A Framework for Political Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. EC (2000a) Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, COM (2000) 1 Final.
15. EC (2000b) Science, Society and Citizens in Europe, SEC (2000) 1973.
16. EC (2001) European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428.
17. EC (2002a) Productivity: The Key to Competitiveness of the European Economies and Enterprises, COM (2002) 262 Final.
18. EC (2002b) Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment, COM (2002) 276 Final.
19. EC (2005) European Values in the Globalised World, COM (2005) 525 Final.
20. EC (2006) Modernizing Labour Law to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century, Green Paper, COM (2006) 708 Final.
21. Felt, U. and Wynne, B (2007) Science and Governance. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously, Report for the European Commission.
22. Forrester, I. and Hanekamp, J.C. (2006) 'Precaution, science and jurisprudence: a test case', Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.297-311.
23. Franzosi, R. (1998) 'Narrative analysis - or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative', Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 24, pp.517-54.
24. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1993) 'Science for the post-normal age', Futures, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp.739-55.
25. Funtowicz, S. and Strand, R. (2007), 'Models of science and policy', in T. Traavik and L.C. Lim (Eds.): Biosafety First. Holistic Approaches to Risk and Uncertainty in Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms, pp.263-278, Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim.
26. Gamble, A. (2005) 'Images of Europe', paper presented at the workshop A Brainstorming Exercise on Political Identity and Legitimacy in the European Union, September, 'Garnet' Network of Excellence, University of Florence, Vol. 23-24.
27. Graham, J. and Hsia, S. (2002) 'Europe's precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls', Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.371-90.
28. Halffman, W. (2005) 'Science-policy boundaries: national styles?', Science and Public Policy, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp.457-167.
29. Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) 'Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research', Science, Vol. 280, pp.69-701.
30. Ingram, H., Schneider, A. and McDonald, B. (2004) 'The political invasion of science: how policy constructs boundaries and meanings', Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, Vol. 2, pp.5-28.
31. Jasanoff, S. (2002) 'Citizens at risk: cultures of modernity in the US and EU', Science as Culture, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.363-380.
32. Jasanoff, S. (2003) 'A living legacy: the precautionary ideal in American law', in J. Tickner (Ed.): Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, pp.227-40, Island Press, Washington DC.
33. Jasanoff, S. (2004) 'The idiom of co-production', in S. Jasanoff (Ed.) States of Knowledge. The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, pp. 1-12, Routledge, London.
34. Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
35. Jepsen, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2005), 'The European social model: an exercise in deconstruction', Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.231-45.
36. Kramer, L. (2004) 'The roots of divergence: a European perspective', in N. Vig and M. Faure (Eds.): Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, pp.53-72, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Latour, B. (1999) Politiques de la Nature, La Découverte, Paris.
38. Latour, B. (2003) 'The promises of constructivism', in D. Idhe and E. Selinger (Eds.): Chasing Technoscience, pp.27-46, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
39. Latour, B. (2004) 'Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern', Critical Inquiry, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.225-248.
40. Levidow, L. and Marris, C. (2001), 'Science and governance in Europe: lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology', Science and Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.345-60.
41. Löfsted, R. (2004) 'The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: from precautionary principle to (regulatory) impact analysis', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.237-60.
42. Löfsted, R. and Vogel, D. (2001), 'The changing character of regulation: a comparison of Europe and the United States', Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp.399-405.
43. Lucarelli, S. (2006) 'Introduction', in S. Lucarelli and I. Manners (Eds.): Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy, pp.1-18, Routledge, New York.
44. Majone, G. (2002) 'What price safety? The precautionary principle and its policy implications', Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp.89-109.
45. Millstone, E., van Zwanenberg, P., Marris, C., Levidow, L. and Torgersen, H. (2004) Science in Trade Disputes Related to Potential Risks: Comparative Case Studies, European Commission, DG JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.
46. Neutra, R., DelPizzo, V. and Lee, G. (2002) Policy Options in the Face of Possible Risks from Power Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF), Final Report, California State EMF Program, available at http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ ehib/emf/RiskEvaluation/PolicyOptionsF.pdf.
47. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge.
48. NRC (National Research Council) (1996) Understanding Risk, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
49. Pellizzoni, L. (2008) 'The antinomy of accountability', in M. Boström and C. Garsten (Eds.): Organizing Transnational Accountability, pp.210-230, Elgar, Cheltenham.
50. Pielke, R. (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. Posner, R. (2004) Catastrophe: Risk and Response, Oxford University Press, New York.
52. RCEP (Royal Commission on Environment and Pollution) (1998) Setting Environmental Standards, Stationery Office, London.
53. Sandin, P. (1999) 'Dimensions of the precautionary principle', Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp.889-907.
54. Sarewitz, D. (2004) 'How science makes environmental controversies worse', Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 7, pp.385-103.
55. Schwartz, S. and Carpenter, K. (1999) 'The right answers for the wrong questions: consequences of type III error for public health research', American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, No. 8, pp.1175-1180.
56. Scott, J. and Vos, E. (2002) 'The juridification of uncertainty: observations on the ambivalence of the precautionary principle within the EU and the WTO', in C. Joerges and R. Dehousse (Eds.): Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, pp.253-86, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
58. Stirling, A. (2001) 'The precautionary principle in science and technology', in T. O'Riordan, J. Cameron and A. Jordan (Eds.): Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, pp.61-94, Cameron May, London.
59. Sunstein, C. (2003) 'Beyond the precautionary principle', ,University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 151, pp. 1003-1058.
60. Sunstein, C. (2005) 'Cost-benefit analysis and the environment', Ethics, Vol. 115, pp.351-85.
61. Tickner, J. and Raffensperger, C. (2001) 'The American view on the precautionary principle', in T. O'Riordan, J. Cameron and A. Jordan (Eds.): Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle, pp. 183-214, May, Cameron, London.
62. UN (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June, available at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/confl51/aconf 15126-lannexl.htm.
63. Van Asselt, M. and Vos, E. (2006) 'The precautionary principle and the uncertainty paradox', Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.313-336.
64. Vogel, D. (2003) 'The politics of risk regulation in Europe and the United States', Yearbook of European Environmental Law, Vol. 3, pp. 1-42, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
65. Weber, M. (1919) 'Politik als Beruf, in Gesammelte politische Schriften, Tubingen, Mohr (1958), pp.505-560.
66. Welsh, I. (2006) 'Values, science and the European Union', in S. Lucarelli and I. Manners (Eds.): Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy, pp. 59-76, Routledge, New York.
67. Wiener, J. (2004), 'Convergence, divergence, and complexity in US and European risk regulation' in N. Vig and M. Faure (Eds.): Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, pp. 17-51, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
68. Wiener, J. and Rogers, M. (2002) 'Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe', Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp.317-49.
69. Wingspread Statement (1998) 'Wingspread statement on the precautionary principle', Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly #586, available at: http://www.monitor.net/rachel/r586.html.
70. Wynne, B. (1992) 'Uncertainty and environmental learning', Global Environmental Change, Vol.6, No. 2, pp. 111-127.
71. Wynne, B. (2001) 'Managing scientific uncertainty in public policy', Conference Biotechnology and Global Governance: Crisis and Opportunity, Boston, Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, available at www.wcfia.harvard.edu/biotech/wynnepaper l.doc.