Site-directed mutagenesis of a family 42 β-galactosidase from an antarctic bacterium

International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 209-218

  Shumway, Matthew V ^a   Sheridan Dr , Peter P ^a  

^a Nucl Eng Idaho State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Beta galactosidase; Cold active; Directed evolution; Site directed mutagenesis

Indexed keywords

2 NITROPHENYL ALPHA DEXTRO GALACTOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL ALPHA DEXTRO GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO FUCOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO GALACTOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO XYLOPYRANOSIDE; 2 NITROPHENYL N ACETYL ALPHA DEXTRO GALACTOSAMINIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL 2 ACETAMIDO 2 DEOXY BETA DEXTRO GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO FUCOPYRANOSIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO GALACTURONIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO XYLOPYRANOSIDE; 4 NITROPHENYL BETA GLUCURONIDE; 42 BETA GALACTOSIDASE; BETA GALACTOSIDASE; ENZYME; NITROPHENOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM MUTANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ASSAY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; HYDROGEN BOND; NONHUMAN; PLANOCOCCUS (BACTERIUM); SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS;

EID: 84862486806     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21524114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams MWW, Perler FB, and Kelly RM. Extremozymes: Expanding the Limits of Biocatalysis. Nat Biotech 1995; 13: 662-668.
2. Macelroy RD. Some comments on the evolution of extremophiles. Biosystems 1974; 6: 74-75.
3. Spiller B, Gershenson A, Arnold FH, and Stevens RC. A structural view of evolutionary divergence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1999; 96: 12305.
4. D'Amico S. Activity-Stability Relationships in Extremophilic Enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003; 278: 7891-7896.
5. Wintrode PL. Cold Adaptation of a Mesophilic Subtilisin-like Protease by Laboratory Evolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000; 275: 31635-31640.
6. Mavromatis K, Feller G, Kokkinidis M, and Bouriotis V. Cold adaptation of a psychrophilic chitinase: a mutagenesis study. Protein Engineering Design and Selection 2003; 16: 497-503.
7. Feller G. Molecular adaptations to cold in psychrophilic enzymes. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) 2003; 60: 648-662.
8. Thorvaldsen S, Hjerde E, Fenton C, and Willassen NP. Molecular characterization of cold adaptation based on ortholog protein sequences from Vibrionaceae species. Extremophiles 2007; 11: 719-732.
9. Jaenicke R. Protein stability and molecular adaptation to extreme conditons. European Journal of Biochemistry 1991; 202: 715-728.
10. Feller G and Gerday C. Psychrophilic enzymes: molecular basis of cold adaptation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 1997; 53: 830-841.
11. Eichler J. Biotechnological uses of archaeal extremozymes. Biotechnology Advances 2001; 19: 261-278.
12. van den Burg B. Extremophiles as a source for novel enzymes. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2003; 6: 213-218.
13. Niehaus F, Bertoldo C, Kähler M, and Antranikian G. Extremophiles as a source of novel enzymes for industrial application. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 1999; 51: 711-729.
14. Huang R, Su R, Qi W, and He Z. Bioconversion of Lignocellulose into Bioethanol: Process Intensification and Mechanism Research. Bio-Energy Research 2011; 4: 225-245.
15. Jon Van G. Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Processing Technology 2005; 86: 1097-1107.
16. Vasudevan PT and Briggs M. Biodiesel production-current state of the art and challenges. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 2008; 35: 421-430.
17. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, and Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol-the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends in Biotechnology 2006; 24: 549-556.
18. Stephanopoulos G. Challenges in Engineering Microbes for Biofuels Production. Science 2007; 315: 801-804.
19. Cuéllar AD and Webber ME. Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environmental Research Letters 2008; 3: 034002.
20. Angelidaki I and Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants: status and future trends. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2003; 109: 95-105.
21. Barnard D, Casanueva A, Tuffin M, and Cowan D. Extremophiles in biofuel synthesis. Environmental Technology 2010; 31: 871-888.
22. Gomes J and Steiner W. The biocatalytic potential of extremophiles and extremozymes. Food technology and Biotechnology 2004; 42: 223-235.
23. Templeton NS. The polymerase chain reaction. History, methods, and applications. Diagnostic molecular pathology: the American journal of surgical pathology, part B 1: 58.
24. Bornscheuer UT and Pohl M. Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2001; 5: 137-143.
25. Arnold FH. Design by directed evolution. Accounts of chemical research 1998; 31: 125-131.
26. Turner NJ. Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. Nat Chem Biol 2009; 5: 567-573.
27. Dellomonaco C, Fava F, and Gonzalez R. The path to next generation biofuels: successes and challenges in the era of synthetic biology. Microbial Cell Factories 2010; 9: 3.
28. Wen F, Nair NU, and Zhao H. Protein engineering in designing tailored enzymes and microorganisms for biofuels production. Current opinion in biotechnology 2009; 20: 412-419.
29. Sheridan PP and Brenchley JE. Characterization of a salt-tolerant family 42 beta-galactosidase from a psychrophilic Antarctic Planococcus isolate. Applied and environmental microbiology 2000; 66: 2438.
30. Henrissat B. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochemical Journal 1991; 280: 309-316.
31. Hidaka M, Fushinobu S, Ohtsu N, Motoshima H, Matsuzawa H, Shoun H, and Wakagi T. Trimeric Crystal Structure of the Glycoside Hydrolase Family 42 β-Galactosidase from Thermus thermophilus A4 and the Structure of its Complex with Galactose. Journal of Molecular Biology 2002; 322: 79-91.
32. Kelley LA and Sternberg MJE. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nature Protocols 2009; 4: 363-371.
33. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, and Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 1994; 22: 4673-4680.
34. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 1999; 41: 95-98.
35. Guex N and Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997; 18: 2714-2723.
36. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Pr, 1972.
37. Marion MB. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 1976; 72: 248-254.