Fast, spatially varying CTF correction in TEM

Ultramicroscopy

Volumn 118, Issue , 2012, Pages 26-34

  Voortman, Lenard M ^a   Franken, Erik M ^b   van Vliet, Lucas J ^a   Rieger, Bernd ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Thermo Fisher Scientific   (United States)

Author keywords

CTF correction; Electron tomography; Phase contrast; Spatially varying; Thick specimen; Tilted specimen

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; PHASE CONTRASTS; SPATIALLY VARYING; THICK SPECIMEN; TILTED SPECIMEN;

MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; MOLECULAR PHYSICS;

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTRAST TRANSFER FUNCTION; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; ILLUMINATION; IMAGING SYSTEM; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPE TOMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862306984     PISSN: 03043991     EISSN: 18792723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jensen G.J., Briegel A. How electron cryotomography is opening a new window onto prokaryotic ultrastructure. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2007, 17:260-267.
2. Philippsen A., Engel H.-A., Engel A. The contrast-imaging function for tilted specimens. Ultramicroscopy 2007, 107:202-212.
3. Voortman L.M., Stallinga S., Schoenmakers R.H.M., van Vliet L.J., Rieger B. A fast algorithm for computing and correcting the CTF for tilted, thick specimens in TEM. Ultramicroscopy 2011, 111:1029-1036.
4. Mariani V., Schenk A., Philippsen A., Engel A. Simulation and correction of electron images of tilted planar weak-phase samples. Journal of Structural Biology 2011, 174:259-268.
5. Fernández J.J., Li S., Crowther R.A. CTF determination and correction in electron cryotomography. Ultramicroscopy 2006, 106:587-596.
6. Xiong Q., Morphew M.K., Schwartz C.L., Hoenger A.H., Mastronarde D.N. CTF determination and correction for low dose tomographic tilt series. Journal of Structural Biology 2009, 168:378-387.
7. Zanetti G., Riches J.D., Fuller S.D., Briggs J.A. Contrast transfer function correction applied to cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging. Journal of Structural Biology 2009, 168:305-312.
8. Jensen G.J., Kornberg R.D. Defocus-gradient corrected back-projection. Ultramicroscopy 2000, 84:57-64.
9. Y. Wan, W. Chiu, Z. Zhou, Full contrast transfer function correction in 3D cryo-EM reconstruction, in: IEEE Proceedings of ICCCAS, vol. 2, 2004, pp. 960-964.
10. Kazantsev I.G., Klukowska J., Herman G.T., Cernetic L. Fully three-dimensional defocus-gradient corrected backprojection in cryoelectron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 2010, 110:1128-1142.
11. Reimer L., Kohl H. Transmission Electron Microscopy 1984, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. fifth ed.
12. Logan B., Shepp L. Optimal reconstruction of a function from its projections. Duke Mathematical Journal 1975, 42:645-659.
13. Greengard L., Lee J.-Y. Accelerating the nonuniform fast Fourier transform. SIAM Review 2004, 46:443.
14. V. Mariani, Transfer of Tilted Sample Information in Transmission Electron Microscopy, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Basel, 2010.
15. Winkler H., Taylor K.A. Focus gradient correction applied to tilt series image data used in electron tomography. Journal of Structural Biology 2003, 143:24-32.
16. Kremer J.R., Mastronarde D.N., McIntosh J. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. Journal of Structural Biology 1996, 116:71-76.