Integration of kinetic modeling and desirability function approach for multi-objective optimization of UASB reactor treating poultry manure wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 118, Issue , 2012, Pages 89-101

  Yetilmezsoy, Kaan ^a  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Desirability function; Kinetic modeling; Multi objective optimization; Poultry manure wastewater; Up flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

Indexed keywords

DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; KINETIC MODELING; MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONS (MOO); POULTRY MANURE; UP-FLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET REACTORS;

KINETIC THEORY; KINETICS; MANURES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RATE CONSTANTS;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ALGORITHM; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MANURE; OPTIMIZATION; POULTRY; REACTION KINETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COST; KINETICS; MANURE; PH; POULTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE; UPFLOW REACTOR; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOREACTORS; KINETICS; MANURE; METHANE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POULTRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84862181269     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.088     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abouelenien F., Nakashimada Y., Nishio N. Dry mesophilic fermentation of chicken manure for production of methane by repeated batch culture. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 107:293-295.
2. Ahn J.H., Forster C.F. Kinetic analyses of the operation of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating a simulated starch wastewater. Process Biochem. 2000, 36:19-23.
3. Akalin O., Akay K.U., Sennaroglu B., Tez M. Optimization of chemical admixture for concrete on mortar performance tests using mixture experiments. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 104:233-242.
4. Basrawi M.F.B., Yamada T., Nakanishi K., Katsumata H. Analysis of the performances of biogas-fuelled micro gas turbine cogeneration systems (MGT-CGSs) in middle- and small-scale sewage treatment plants: comparison of performances and optimization of MGTs with various electrical power outputs. Energy 2012, 38:291-304.
5. Bayramoglu M., Kobya M., Eyvaz M., Senturk E. Technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 51:404-408.
6. Bortone G. Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:5424-5430.
7. Buyukkamaci N., Filibeli A. Determination of kinetic constants of an anaerobic hybrid reactor. Process Biochem. 2002, 38:73-79.
8. Chen Y.R., Hashimoto A.G. Kinetics of methane fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1978, 8:269-282.
9. Coffey T., Gennings C., Moser V.C. The simultaneous analysis of discrete and continuous outcomes in a dose-response study: using desirability functions. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2007, 48:51-58.
10. Das P., Mukherjee S., Ganguly S., Bhattacharyay B.K., Datta S. Genetic algorithm based optimization for multi-physical properties of HSLA steel through hybridization of neural network and desirability function. Comp. Mater. Sci. 2009, 45:104-110.
11. Debik E., Coskun T. Use of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2777-2782.
12. Hashimoto A.G. Methane production from cattle waste: effect of temperature, hydraulic retention time and influent substrate concentration on kinetic parameter (K). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982, 24:2039-2052.
13. Hashimoto A.G. Methane from swine manure: effects of temperature and influent substrate concentration on kinetic parameter (K). Agric. Waste. 1984, 9:299-308.
14. Isik M., Sponza D.T. Substrate removal kinetics in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor decolorising simulated textile wastewater. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1189-1198.
15. Kapdan I.K., Erten B. Anaerobic treatment of saline wastewater by Halanaerobium Lacusrosei. Process Biochem. 2007, 42:449-453.
16. Kaynakli O. A study on residential heating energy requirement and optimum insulation thickness. Renew. Energ. 2008, 33:1164-1172.
17. Malenović A., Dotsikas Y., MaŠković M., Jančić-Stojanović B., Ivanović D., Medenica M. Desirability-based optimization and its sensitivity analysis for the perindopril and its impurities analysis in a microemulsion LC system. Microchem. J. 2011, 99:454-460.
18. Martín Santos M.A., López J.A.S., Pérez A.F.C., Martín A.M. Modelling the anaerobic digestion of wastewater derived from the pressing of orange peel produced in orange juice manufacturing. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:3909-3916.
19. Nijaguna B.T. Biogas Technology 2002, Principal JSS Academy of Technical Education Bangalore, New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New Delhi, Bangalore, 300p.
20. Sakar S., Yetilmezsoy K., Kocak-Enturk E. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment - a literature review. Waste Manage. Res. 2009, 27:3-18.
21. Schoumans, O.F., Rulkens, W.H., Oenema, O., Ehlert, P.A.I., 2010. Phosphorus recovery from animal manure, Technical opportunities and agro-economical perspectives, Alterra report 2158, ISSN: 1566-7197, Wageningen, 111p.
22. Sponza D.T., Ulukoy A. Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4 DCP). J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86:121-131.
23. Thiers S., Aoun B., Peuportier B. Experimental characterization, modeling and simulation of a wood pellet micro-combined heat and power unit used as a heat source for a residential building. Energy Buildings 2010, 42:896-903.
24. Turkdogan-Aydinol F.I., Yetilmezsoy K., Comez S., Bayhan H. Performance evaluation and kinetic modeling of the start-up of an UASB reactor treating municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioproc. Biosyst Eng. 2010, 34(2):153-162.
25. TWPCR (Turkish Water Pollution Control Regulation), Official Gazette No. 25687 dated December 31, 2004.
26. Videla S., Chamy R., Navarrete E., Lema J.M. Design and operation of anaerobic digesters using multi-objective optimization criteria. J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 1990, 49:223-231.
27. Wang J., Wan W. Application of desirability function based on neural network for optimizing biohydrogen production process. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:1253-1259.
28. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7928-7940.
29. Yetilmezsoy, K., 2008. Treatability of poultry manure wastewater using anaerobic sludge bed reactor. PhD Thesis, Institute of Science, Department of Environmental Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
30. Yetilmezsoy K., Sakar S. Improvement of COD and color removal from UASB treated poultry manure wastewater using Fenton's oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151:547-558.
31. Yetilmezsoy K., Sakar S. Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 153:532-543.
32. Yetilmezsoy K., Sapci-Zengin Z. Stochastic modeling applications for the prediction of COD removal efficiency of UASB reactors treating diluted real cotton textile wastewater. Stochas. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2009, 23:13-26.
33. Yetilmezsoy K., Ilhan F., Sapci-Zengin Z., Sakar S., Gonullu M.T. Decolorization and COD reduction of UASB pretreated poultry manure wastewater by electrocoagulation process: a posttreatment study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:120-132.
34. Yetilmezsoy K., Turkdogan-Aydinol F.I., Gunay A., Ozis I. Post treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and appraisal of the economic outcome. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2011, 10:1635-1645.