Optimization of chemical admixture for concrete on mortar performance tests using mixture experiments

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 233-242

  Akalin, Ozlem ^a   Akay, Kadri Ulas ^b   Sennaroglu, Bahar ^c   Tez, Müjgan ^c  

^a Plustechno Consultancy and Chemicals Ltd   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Chemical admixture; Desirability function; Mixture design; Mixture experiments; Scheff polynomials; Trace plot

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; CONCRETE;

ARTICLE; BUILDING MATERIAL; CEMENT INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; LINEAR SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION KINETICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 78650308059     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Douglas E., Pouskouleli G. Prediction of compressive strength of mortars made with portland cement-blast furnace slag-fly ash blends. Cem. Concr. Res. 1991, 21:532-534.
2. Wang D., Chen Z. On predicting compressive strength of mortars with ternary blends of cement, ggbfs and fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 1997, 27:487-493.
3. Simon M., Synder K., Frohnsdorff G. Advances in concrete mixture optimization. Proceedings of Concrete Durability and Repair Technology Conference, 8-10 September 1999 1999, 21-32. Thomas Telford Publishing, Scotland, UK, London, England. R.K. Dhir, M.J. McCarthy (Eds.).
4. Ding J.-T., Yan P.-Y., Liu S.-L., Zhu J.-Q. Extreme vertices design of concrete with combined mineral admixtures. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29:957-960.
5. Chen H.S., Sun W., Stroeven P. Prediction of compressive strength and optimization of mixture proportioning in ternary cementitious systems. Mater. Struct. 2003, 36:396-401.
6. Piepel G.F. 50 years of mixture experiment research: 1955-2004. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, 283-327. World Scientific, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
7. Cornell J.A. Developing mixture models, are we done?. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 2000, 66:127-144.
8. Cornell J.A. Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
9. Scheffé H. Experiments with mixtures. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1958, 20:344-360.
10. Anderson-Cook C.M., Ozol-Godfrey A. Using fraction of design space plots for informative comparisons between designs. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, 379-407. World Scientific, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
11. Måge I., Næs T. Split-plot design for mixture experiments with process variables: a comparison of design strategies. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 78:81-95.
12. Derringer G.C., Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12:214-219.
13. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
14. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2005, vol. 425:394-395. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 6th ed.
15. Design-Expert Software for Response Surface Methodology and Mixture Experiments, Version 6.0.9 2003, Stat-Ease, Stat-Ease Inc, Minneapolis, MN.
16. Cox D.R. A note on polynomial response functions for mixtures. Biometrika 1971, 58:155-159.
17. TS EN 480-1 Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout - Test methods - Part 1: Reference concrete and reference mortar for testing, February 2001, Ankara, Turkey.