Improving eyewitness identification accuracy by screening out those who say they don't know

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-36

  Weber, Nathan ^a   Perfect, Timothy J ^b  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

eyewitness identification; free report; monitoring and control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MEMORY; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862173582     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0093976     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2008). Eyewitness confidence and latency: Indices of memory processes not just markers of accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 827-840. doi:10.1002/acp.1486
2. Brewer, N., Weber, N., Clark, A., & Wells, G. L. (2008). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications with an optional deadline procedure. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 397-414. doi: 10.1080/10683160701770229
3. Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11-30. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11 (Pubitemid 43396098)
4. Clark, S. E., Howell, R. T., & Davey, S. L. (2008). Regularities in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 187-218. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9082-4 (Pubitemid 351692045)
5. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dahl, L. C., Brimacombe, C., & Lindsay, D. (2009). Investigating investigators: How presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 368-380. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9151-y
7. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bernstein, B. H., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 287-307. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9008-1 (Pubitemid 44264924)
8. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.818
9. Higham, P. A. (2007). No Special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 1-22. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.1
10. Innocence Project. (2010). Understand the causes: Eyewitness misidentification. Retrieved August 30th, 2010, from http://www. innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php
11. Kelley, C. M., & Sahakyan, L. (2003). Memory, monitoring, and control in the attainment of memory accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 704-721. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00504-1 (Pubitemid 36593544)
12. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490 (Pubitemid 126432208)
13. Lindsay, D. S., Nilsen, E., & Read, J. D. (2000). Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 685-697. doi:10.1023/A:1005504320565
14. Lindsay, D. S., Read, J. D., & Sharma, K. (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science, 9, 215-218. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00041 (Pubitemid 128088981)
15. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564. doi:10.1037/0021-9010. 70.3.556
16. Luus, C., & Wells, G. L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15(1), 43-57. doi:10.1007/BF01044829
17. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482-489. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.482
18. Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1968). Data analysis including statistics. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 80-203). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., McKinnon, A. C., & Weber, N. (2010). Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions. Acta Psychologica, 133, 137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.002
20. Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2010). Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 387-398. doi:10.1037/a0021034
21. Perfect, T. J. (2002). When does eyewitness confidence predict performance? In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 95-120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Perfect, T. J., Watson, E. L., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1993). Accuracy of confidence ratings associated with general knowledge and eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 144-147. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.144
23. Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293. doi: 10.1007/BF01044385
24. Read, J. D., Lindsay, D. S., & Nicholls, T. (1998). The relation between confidence and accuracy in eyewitness identification studies: Is the conclusion changing? In C. P. Thompson, D. J. Herrmann, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, D. G. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 107-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Sauer, J., Brewer, N., Zweck, T., & Weber, N. (2010). The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 337-347. doi:10.1007/s10979-009- 9192-x
26. Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. L. (2009). Fast and confident: Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 46-62. doi:10.1037/a0014560
27. Shaw, J. S. (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126-146. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.2.2.126
28. Shaw, J. S., & McClure, K. A. (1996). Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 629-653. doi:10.1007/BF01499235 (Pubitemid 26427249)
29. Smith, S. M., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Pryke, S. (2000). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 542-550. doi:10.1037110 021-9010.85.4.542
30. Sporer, S. L. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157-180. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220205
31. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
32. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2003). Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A metaanalytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 523-540. doi: 10.1023/A:1025438223608 (Pubitemid 37295503)
33. Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217-237. doi:10.1023/A:1025746220886 (Pubitemid 28178219)
34. U.S. Department of Justice. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
35. Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980). Why do eyewitnesses make so many mistakes? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 362-366. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00716.x
36. Wason, P. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140. doi:10.1080/17470216008416717
37. Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2003). The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 490-499. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.490 (Pubitemid 36704290)
38. Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2006). Positive versus negative face recognition decisions: Confidence, accuracy, and response latency. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 17-31. doi:10.1002/acp.1166 (Pubitemid 43216592)
39. Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2008). Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 50-60. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.50
40. Weber, N., Brewer, N., Wells, G. L., Semmler, C., & Keast, A. (2004). Eyewitness identification and response latency: The unruly 10-12 second rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 139-147. doi:10.1037/1076-898X. 10.3.139 (Pubitemid 39305488)
41. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.5.553
42. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360-376. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
43. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1999). Distortions in eyewitnesses' recollections: Can the postidentification-feedback effect be moderated? Psychological Science, 10, 138-144. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00121