Predicting the Directionality of Probability Words from Their Membership Functions

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 159-180

  Budescu, David V ^a   Karelitz, Tzur M ^a   Wallsten, Thomas S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Directionality; Membership functions; Probability judgments; Subjective probabilities; Verbal probabilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038458649     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.440     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 257-269.
2. Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H. (1988). Verbal probabilities: ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 390-404.
3. Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 36, 391-405.
4. Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. In J. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from a cognitive perspective (pp. 275-318). New York: Academic Press.
5. Cohen, B. L., & Wallsten, T. S. (1992). The effect of constant outcome value on judgments and decision making given linguistic probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 53-72.
6. Erev, I., & Cohen, B. L. (1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 1-18.
7. Jaffe-Katz, A., Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (1989). Timed magnitude comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty. Memory and Cognition, 17, 249-264.
8. Lichtenstein, S., & Newman, J. R. (1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Science, 9, 563-564.
9. Mosteller, F., & Youtz, C. (1990). Quantifying probabilistic expressions. Statistical Science, 5, 2-16.
10. Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). Communicating quantities: A psychological perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.
11. Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 237-255.
12. Mullet, E., & Rivet, I. (1991). Comprehension of verbal probability expressions in children and adolescents. Language and Communication, 11, 217-225.
13. Norwich, A. M., & Tursken, I. B. (1984). A model of the measurement of fuzziness. In R. R. Yager (Ed.), Fuzzy set and possibility theory (pp. 49-60). New York: Pergamon Press.
14. Olson, M. J., & Budescu, D. V. (1997). Patterns of preference for numerical and verbal probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 117-131.
15. Rapoport, A., Wallsten, T. S., & Cox, J. A. (1987). Direct and indirect scaling of membership functions of probability phrases. Mathematical Modeling, 9, 397-417.
16. Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (1995). Yes, but it is uncertain: direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms. Acta Psychologica, 88, 233-258.
17. Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 80, 155-190.
18. Teigen, K. H., & Brun, W. (2000). Ambiguous probabilities: when does p = 0.3 reflect a possibility, and when does it express a doubt? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 345-362.
19. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
20. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R., & Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348-365.
21. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Kemp, S. M. (1993). Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 135-138.
22. Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1995). A review of human linguistic probability processing: general principles and empirical evidence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 43-62.
23. Wallsten, T. S., Filenbaum, S., & Cox, J. A. (1986). Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 571-587.
24. Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789.