Balancing participation and risks in children's internet use: The role of internet literacy and parental mediation

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 257-262

  Lee, Sook Jung ^a   Chae, Young Gil ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Hankuk University of Foreign Studies   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER LITERACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEGOTIATING; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTING; RISK;

EID: 84862080296     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0552     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2010) 2010 Korean Internet White Paper. Seoul: Korean Communication Commission.
2. Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society 2008; 10:393-411.
3. Livingstone S, Helsper E. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society 2010; 12:309-329.
4. Gross EF. Adolescent Internet use: what we expect, what teens report. Applied Development Psychology 2004; 25: 633-649.
5. Lee S. Online communication and adolescent social ties: who benefits more from Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2009; 14:509-531.
6. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Psychological Science 2009; 18:1-5.
7. Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ. Is talking online to unknown people always risky? Distinguishing online interaction styles in a national sample of youth internet users. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 2008; 11:340-343.
8. Barnes S. A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 2006; 11. www.firstmonday.org/ issues/issue11-9/barnes/index.html
9. Aufderheide P. (1993) Media literacy: a report of the national leadership conference on media literacy. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute.
10. Potter WJ. The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2010; 54:675-696.
11. Jenkins H, Purushotma R, Clinton K, et al. (2006) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Chicago: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
12. Livingstone S. (2008) Internet literacy: Young people's negotiation of new online opportunities. In McPherson T, ed. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 101-122.
13. Buckingham D. (2007) Beyond technology: Children's learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Facer K, Sutherland R, Furlong J, et al. What's the point of using computers? The development of young people's computer expertise in the home. New Media & Society 2001; 3:199-219.
15. Hargittai E. Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the "Net Generation." Sociological Inquiry 2010; 80:92-113.
16. Hargittai E, Hinnant A. Digital inequality: differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research 2008; 35:602-621.
17. Livingstone S, Helsper E. Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society 2007; 9: 671-696.
18. Nathanson AI. (2008) Parental mediation strategies. In Dons-bach W. ed. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. www.communicationencyclopedia. com/public/book?id = g9781405131995-yr2010-9781405131995
19. Warren R. In words and deeds: parental involvement and mediation of children's television viewing. Journal of Family Communication 2001; 1:211-231.
20. Nathanson AI. Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2001; 45:201-220.
21. Valkenburg PM, Krcmar M, Peeters AL, et al. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: "instructive mediation," "Restrictive mediation", and "social cov-iewing". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1999; 43:52-66.
22. Mendoza K. Surveying parental mediation: Connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education 2009; 1:28-41.
23. Cho Y, Bae J. Study on parental mediation of children's digital media use within the home environment. Media, Gender & Culture 2010; 13:37-74.
24. Lee S, Jeon S. Adolescent Internet use and parental mediation practice: Using parent-child interviews. Media, Gender & Culture 2011; 17:5-42.
25. Lwin MO, Stanaland AJS, Miyazaki AD. Protecting children's privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing 2008; 84:205-217.
26. Valcke M, Wever BA, Keer HV, et al. Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Computers & Education 2011; 57:1292-1305.
27. Livingstone S, Helsper E. Parental mediation of children's Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2008; 52: 581-599.
28. Mesch GS. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyber-bullying. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 2009; 12:387-393.
29. Hargittai E. Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review 2005; 23:371-379.
30. Ahn J. Types of Internet mediation and its relationship with precedent variables. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies 2008; 22: 230-264.
31. Eastin MS, Greenberg BS, Hofschire L. Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication 2006; 56: 486-504.
32. Buckingham D. (2005) The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature on behalf of Ofcom. London: Ofcom.
33. van Deursen AJAM, van Dijk JAGM. Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users' online behavior. Interacting with Computers 2009; 21:393-402.
34. Johnson GM. (2008) Functional Internet literacy: required cognitive skills with implications for instruction. In Lank-shear C, Knobel M, eds. Digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices. NY: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 33-45.