Parental mediation of children's internet use

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 581-599

  Livingstone, Sonia ^a   Helsper, Ellen J ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57349181604     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838150802437396     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Austin, E. W. (1990). Effects of family communication on children's interpretation of television. In J. Bryant & J. A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (pp. 377-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Austin, E. W. (1993). Exploring the effects of active parental mediation of television content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 147-158.
3. Berson, I., & Berson, M. (2005). Challenging online behaviors of youth: Findings from a comparative analysis of young people in the US and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 29-38.
4. Criddle, L. (2006). Look both ways: Help protect your family on the internet. Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
5. Eastin, M., Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication, 56, 486-504.
6. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screen play: Children and computing in the home. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
7. Fox, S. (2005). Generations online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
8. Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2002). The relationship of family communication patterns to parental mediation styles. Communication Research, 29(6), 642-665.
9. Fujioka, Y., & Austin, E. W. (2003). The implications of vantage point in parental mediation of television and child's attitudes toward drinking alcohol. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 418-434.
10. Goodman, I. R. (1983). Television's role in family interaction: A family systems perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 4(2), 405-424.
11. Hoover, S. M., Clark, L. S., & Alters, D. F. (2004). Media, home, and family. New York: Routledge.
12. Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2006). Children's home Internet use: Predictors and psychological, social and academic consequences. In R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet (pp. 145-167). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366-380.
14. Kunkel, D., & Wilcox, B. (2001). Children and media policy. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 589-604). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Lenhart, A. (2005). Protecting teens online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
16. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
17. Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. H. (2005). Factors influencing adolescents' engagement in risky Internet behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(2), 513-520.
18. Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.
19. Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 920-941.
20. Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2005). UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
21. Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2006). Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations (pp. 93-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007) Taking risks when communicating on the Internet: The role of offline social-psychological factors in young people's vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication and Society, 10(5), 619-643.
23. McMillan, S. (2006). Interactivity: Users, documents, and systems. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media: Updated student edition (pp. 164-175). London: Sage.
24. Messaris, P., & Kerr, D. (1984). TV-related mother-child interaction and children's perceptions of TV characters. Journalism Quarterly, 61(3), 662-666.
25. Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003). The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: A national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth & Society, 34(3), 330-358.
26. Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124-143.
27. Nathanson, A. I. (2001a). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 201-220.
28. Nathanson, A. I. (2001b). Parents versus peers: Exploring the significance of peer mediation of antisocial television. Journal of Communication, 28, 251-274.
29. Nathanson, A. I. (2004). Factual and evaluative approaches to modifying children's responses to violent television. Journal of Communication, 54, 321-335.
30. Nathanson, A. I., Eveland, W. P., Park, H. S., & Paul, B. (2002). Perceived media influence and efficacy as predictors of caregivers' protective behaviors. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 385-410.
31. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children's video game playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media & Technology, 31, 181-202.
32. Oswell, D. (2008). Media and communications regulation and child protection: An overview of the field. In S. Livingstone & K. Drotner (Eds.), The international handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 475-492). London: Sage.
33. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2006). Adolescents' exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet. Communication Research, 33(2), 178-204.
34. Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17(4), 523-544.
35. Roberts, D., Foehr, U., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18-yearolds. Menlo Park, CA.: Kaiser Family Foundation.
36. Staksrud, E. (2005). SAFT (Safety Awareness Facts and Tools) project final report. Retrieved March 13, 2007, from http://europa.eu.int/information- society/activities/sip/projects/aware ness/saft/index-en.htm#results
37. Turow, J., & Nir, L. (2000). The Internet and the family: The view of U.S. parents. In C. Feilitzen & U. Carlsson (Eds.), Children in the new media landscape (pp. 331-348). Goteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
38. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: "instructive mediation," "restrictive mediation," and "social coviewing." Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52-66.
39. Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children's media use: Gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 329-348.
40. van der Voort, T. H. A., Nikken, P., & van Lil, J. E. (1992). Determinants of parental guidance of children's television viewing: A Dutch replication study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36, 61-74.
41. von Feilitzen, C., & Carlsson, U. (2004). Promote or protect? Perspectives on media literacy and media regulations. Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
42. Warren, R. (2005). Parental mediation of children's television viewing in low-income families. Journal of Communication, 55, 847-863.
43. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users. Pediatrics, 119, 247-257.