Online communication and adolescent social ties: who benefits more from internet use?

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 509-531

  Lee, Sook Jung ^a,b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b 221 Heukseok Dong   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EARLY AGE; INTERNET USE; ON-LINE COMMUNICATION; ONLINE TIME; RICH GET RICHER; SOCIAL COMPENSATIONS; SOCIAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS; SOCIAL TIES; STUDY SAMPLES;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 68249141693     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01451.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bessiere, K., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., & Boneva, B. (2008). Effects of Internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication & Society, 11 (1 47 70.
2. Blumler, J. G. & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communication. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241 258). New York : Greenwood Press.
4. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1).
5. Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Janckson, A., & Smallwood, A. M. K. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2).
6. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 1101 1111.
7. Calvert, S. L., Rideout, V. J., Woolard, J. L., Barr, R. F., & Strouse, G. A. (2005). Age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic patterns in early computer use. American Behavioral Scientist, 48 (5 590 607.
8. Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communication of the ACM, 45 (7 103 108.
9. Ellison, N. B. Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4).
10. Goby, V. P. (2006). Personality and online/offline choice: MBTI profiles and favored communication modes in a Singapore study. CyberPsychology & Behaviors, 9 (1 5 13.
11. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633 649.
12. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1 75 90.
13. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (pp. 103 196). New York, NY : John Wiley.
14. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Example from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 599 610.
15. Howard, P. E. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3 383 404.
16. Klein, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY : The Guilford Press.
17. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49 74.
18. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9 1017 1031.
19. Lee, W., & Kuo, E. C. Y. (2002). Internet and displacement effects: children's media use and activities in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7 (2 341.
20. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet. Media Psychology, 1, 249 269.
21. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1 9 31.
22. nd Ed.). London : Sage.
23. Mesch, G. (2003). The family and the Internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (4 1038 1050.
24. Mesch, G. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6 (2 119 138.
25. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA : Muthen & Muthen.
26. Neuman, S. (1991). Literacy in the television age. Norwood : Ablex Publishing.
27. Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet Use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: A time diary study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life (pp. 215 243). Malden : Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
28. Orleans, M., & Laney, M. C. (2000). Children's computer use in the home: Isolation or sociation? Social Science Computer Review, 8 (1 56 72.
29. Parks, M. R. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46 (1 80 97.
30. Peterson, J., & Zill, N. (1986). Marital disruption, parent-child relationships, and behavioral problems in children, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48 (2 295 307.
31. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1 24.
32. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Washington, D.C. : The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
33. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V. J. & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids & Media @ the New Millennium. Washington, D.C. : The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
34. Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (1).
35. Stritzke, W. Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-representational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1 22.
36. Suoninen, A. (2001). The role of media in peer group relations. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and changing media environment. Menhwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Valentine, G., & Holloway, S. L. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring children's identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (2 302 319.
38. Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, New York.
39. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4 article 2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/valkenburg.html.
40. Vandewater, E. A. & Lee, S. J. (in press). Measuring children's media use in the digital age: Issues and challenges. American Behavioral Scientist.
41. Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (1985). Historical trends in research on children and the media: 1900-1960. Journal of Communication, 35, 118 133.
42. Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3 436 455.
43. Zhu, B., Walter, S. D., Rosenbaum, P. L., Russell, D. J., & Raina, P. (2006). Structural equation and log-linear modeling: A comparison of methods in the analysis of a study on caregivers' health, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (49 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/6/49.