Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 387-393

  Mesch, Gustavo S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BULLYING; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JUVENILE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; ADULT; AGGRESSION; CHILD; DOMINANCE-SUBORDINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; PARENTING; PEER GROUP; REFERENCE VALUES; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 68149179176     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lenhart A, Madden M. (2007) Teens, privacy & online social networks. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/454/teens- privacy-online-sociaT networks.
2. Giordano PC. Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology 2003; 29:257-81.
3. Rubin KH, Bukowski WM, Parker JG. (1998) Peer interactions, relationships and groups. In Eisenberg N, ed. Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional and personality development. New York: Wiley, pp. 619-700.
4. Crosnoe R. Friendships in childhood and adolescence: the life course and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly 2000; 63:377-91.
5. Hartup WW. The company they keep: friendships and theidevelopmental significance. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry & Child Development 1997; 63-78.
6. Berson IR, Berson MJ, Ferron JM. Emerging risks of violence in the digital age. Journal of School Violence 2002; 2:51-71.
7. Patchin J, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice 2006; 4:148-69.
8. Mitchell KJ, Ybarra M, Finkelhor D. The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment 2007; 12: 314-24.
9. Rosen LD, Cheever NA, Carrier ML. The impact of parental attachment style, limit setting and monitoring on teen MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008; 29:459-71.
10. Livingstone S. Strategies of parental regulation in the mediarich home. Computers in Human Behavior 2007; 23:920-41.
11. Eastin M, Greenberg B, Hofschire L. (2006) Parenting the Internet. Journal of Communication 2006; 56:486-504.
12. Spears G, Seydegart K, Zulinov P. (2005) Young Canadians in a wired world: phase II: student survey. Ottawa: Media Awareness Network.
13. Rosen LD. (2007) Me, MySpace, and I: parenting the Net generation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 2004; 45:308-16.
15. Heirman W, Walrave M. Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. CyerPsychology 2008; 2:22-44.
16. Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ, Wollak J. Online victimization: a report of the nation youth. Center for Missing and Exploited Children. www.unh.edu/ccre/ youth-nternet-nfo-age.html accessed Dec. 11, 2008).
17. Cohen LE, Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 979; 44:588-605.
18. Mesch GS. (2007) Social diversification: a perspective for the study of social networks of adolescents offline and on1ine1 In Kutscher N, Otto HU, eds. Grenzenlose Cyberwelt? Heidelberg, Germany: Verlag Fur Sozialwiseenschaften, pp. 105-21.
19. Rothfuss-Buerkel NL, Buerkel RA.(2001) Family mediation. In Bryant J, Bryant AJ, eds. Television and the American family. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 335-75.
20. Bybee C, Robinson D, Turow J. Determinants of parental guidance of children's television viewing for a special subgroup: mass media scholars. Journal of Broadcasting 1982; 26:697-710.
21. Lee SJ, Chae YG. Children's Internet use in a family context: influence on family relationships and parental mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:640-4.
22. Hoan CC, Cheon SJ. Children exposure to negative Internet content: the effects of family context. Journal of Broadcasting & Media 2005; 49:488-509.
23. Mnet. (2001) Young Canadians in a wired world-Mnet survey. www.mediaawareness/ca/english/special-initiatives/surveys/index.cfm.
24. Li Q. Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. School Psychology International 2006; 27:57-170.
25. Beebe TJ, Asche SE, Harrison PQ, et al. Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health 2004; 5:116-23.