In vivo correlation between semi-quantitative hemodynamic parameters and K trans derived from DCE-MRI of brain tumors

International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 132-136

  Chen, Chih Feng ^a   Hsu, Ling Wei ^b   Lui, Chun Chung ^b   Lee, Chen Chang ^b   Weng, Hsu Huei ^a   Tsai, Yuan Hsiung ^a   Liu, Ho Ling ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

dynamic contrast enhanced; initial area under the curve; magnetic resonance imaging; volume transfer constant

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVES; BRAIN TUMORS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DCE-MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; IN-VIVO; MR SCANNERS; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION; TREATMENT FOLLOW-UP; VOLUME TRANSFER;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; TUMORS;

NEUROIMAGING;

EID: 84862062480     PISSN: 08999457     EISSN: 10981098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22013     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. N.S. Akella, D.B. Twieg, T. Mikkelsen, F.H. Hochberg, S. Grossman, G.A. Cloud, and, L.B. Nabors, Assessment of brain tumor angiogenesis inhibitors using perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: Quality and analysis results of a phase I trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004), 913-922. (Pubitemid 39577891)
2. M. Beaumont, M.G. Duval, Y. Loai, W.A. Farhat, G.K. Sandor, and, H.L.M. Cheng, Monitoring angiogenesis in soft-tissue engineered constructs for calvarium bone regeneration: An in vivo longitudinal DCE-MRI study. NMR Biomed 23 (2010), 48-55.
3. D.L. Buckley, Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 47 (2002), 601-606. (Pubitemid 34194016)
4. Y.C. Chang, C.S. Huang, Y.J. Liu, J.H. Chen, Y.S. Lu, and, W.Y.I. Tseng, Angiogenic response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated with parametric histogram from dynamic contrast-enhanced. Phys Med Biol 49 (2004), 3593-3602.
5. H.L. Cheng, Improved correlation to quantitative DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters using a modified initial area under the uptake curve (mIAUC) approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 30 (2009), 864-872.
6. P. Di Giovanni, C.A. Azlan, T.S. Ahearn, S.I. Semple, F.J. Gilbert, and, T.W. Redpath, The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T. Phys Med Biol 55 (2010), 121-132.
7. J.L. Evelhoch, Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 10 (1999), 254-259. (Pubitemid 29463107)
8. J.L. Evelhoch, P.M. LoRusso, Z. He, Z. DelProposto, L. Polin, T.H. Corbett, P. Langmuir, C. Wheeler, A. Stone, J. Leadbetter, A.J. Ryan, D.C. Blakey, and, J.C. Waterton, Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the response of murine and human tumors to the vascular-targeting agent ZD6126. Clin Cancer Res 10 (2004), 3650-3657. (Pubitemid 38697598)
9. C. Foottit, G.O. Cron, M.J. Hogan, T.B. Nguyen, and, I. Cameron, Determination of the venous output function from MR signal phase: Feasibility for quantitative DCE-MRI in human brain. Magn Reson Med 63 (2010), 772-781.
10. Y. Gal, A.J.H. Mehnert, A.P. Bradley, K. McMahon, D. Kennedy, and, S. Crozier, Denoising of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images using dynamic nonlocal means. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29 (2010), 302-310.
11. S.M. Galbraith, M.A. Lodge, N.J. Taylor, G.J. Rustin, S. Bentzen, J.J. Stirling, and, A.R. Padhani, Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: Comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 15 (2002), 132-142. (Pubitemid 34213403)
12. C. Hayes, A.R. Padhani, and, M.O. Leach, Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 15 (2002), 154-163. (Pubitemid 34213405)
13. G.H. Heppner, Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 44 (1984), 2259-2265. (Pubitemid 14110633)
14. A. Jackson, G.C. Jayson, K.L. Li, X.P. Zhu, D.R. Checkley, J.J. Tessier, and, J.C. Waterton, Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma. Br J Radiol 76 (2003), 153-162. (Pubitemid 36553239)
15. J.A. Jesberger, N. Rafie, J.L. Duerk, J.L. Sunshine, M. Mendez, S.C. Remick, and, J.S. Lewin, Model-free parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced- MRI: Sensitivity to EES volume fraction and bolus timing. JMagn Reson Imaging 24 (2006), 586-594. (Pubitemid 44320561)
16. F. Kiessling, M. Jugold, E.C. Woenne, and, G. Brix, Non-invasive assessment of vessel morphology and function in tumors by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17 (2007), 2136-2148. (Pubitemid 47097471)
17. C.K. Kuhl, H. Kooijman, J. Gieseke, and, H.H. Schild, Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 244 (2007), 929-930. (Pubitemid 47292110)
18. M. Medved, G. Karczmar, C. Yang, J. Dignam, T.F. Gajewski, H. Kindler, E. Vokes, P. MacEneany, M.T. Mitchell, and, W.M. Stadler, Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004), 122-128. (Pubitemid 38857525)
19. T.M. Moehler, H. Hawighorst, K. Neben, G. Egerer, J. Hillengass, R. Max, A. Benner, A.D. Ho, G. van Kaick, and, H. Goldschmidt, Bone marrow microcirculation analysis in multiple myeloma by contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cancer 93 (2001), 862-868. (Pubitemid 32756756)
20. J. Narang, R. Jain, A.S. Arbab, T. Mikkelsen, L. Scarpace, M.L. Rosenblum, D. Hearshen, and, A. Babajani-Feremi, Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis from recurrent/progressive brain tumor using nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion. Neuro-Oncology 13 (2011), 1037-1046.
21. N.A. Pack, E.V. Dibella, B.D. Wilson, and, C.J. McGann, Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 26 (2008), 532-542.
22. G.J. Parker, C. Roberts, A. Macdonald, G.A. Buonaccorsi, S. Cheung, D.L. Buckley, A. Jackson, Y. Watson, K. Davies, G.C. Jayson, Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 56 (2006), 993-1000. (Pubitemid 44691341)
23. T.F. Patankar, H.A. Haroon, S.J. Mills, D. Baleriaux, D.L. Buckley, G.J. Parker, and, A. Jackson, Is volume transfer coefficient (K(trans)) related to histologic grade in human gliomas? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26 (2005), 2455-2465.
24. C. Roberts, B. Issa, A. Stone, A. Jackson, J.C. Waterton, and, G.J. Parker, Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 23 (2006), 554-563.
25. T.T. Shih, H.A. Hou, C.Y. Liu, B.B. Chen, J.L. Tang, H.Y. Chen, S.Y. Wei, M. Yao, S.Y. Huang, W.C. Chou, S.C. Hsu, W. Tsay, C.W. Yu, C.Y. Hsu, H.F. Tien, and, P.C. Yang, Bone marrow angiogenesis magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Peak enhancement ratio is an independent predictor for overall survival. Blood 113 (2009), 3161-3167.
26. P.S. Tofts, Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7 (1997), 91-101. (Pubitemid 28365643)
27. P.S. Tofts, and, A.G. Kermode, Measurement of the blood-brain-barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging.1. Fundamental-concepts. Magn Reson Med 17 (1991), 357-367.
28. S. Walker-Samuel, M.O. Leach, and, D.J. Collins, Evaluation of response to treatment using DCE-MRI: The relationship between initial area under the gadolinium curve (IAUGC) and quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis. Phys Med Biol 51 (2006), 3593-3602. (Pubitemid 44026420)