Improved correlation to quantitative DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters using a modified initial area under the uptake curve (mIAUC) approach

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 864-872

  Cheng, Hai Ling Margaret ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI; Initial area under the uptake curve (IAUC); Pharmacokinetic parameters; Reproducibility; Tofts' model

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 70349687382     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21916     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cheng HL, Wallis C, Shou Z, Farhat WA. Quantifying angiogenesis in VEGF-enhanced tissue-engineered bladder constructs by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using contrast agents of different molecular weights. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:137-145. (Pubitemid 46095208)
2. Padhani AR. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:407-422.
3. Beek AM, Kuhl HP, Bondarenko O, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:895-901. (Pubitemid 37059750)
4. Workie DW, Dardzinski BJ, Graham TB, Laor T, Bommer WA, O'Brien KJ. Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis based on pharmacokinetic modelling. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1201-1210. (Pubitemid 39647718)
5. Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL, et al. Assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapeutics using MRI: recommendations for appropriate methodology for clinical trials. Br J Radiol 2003;76:S87-S91.
6. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91-101.
7. Evelhoch JL. Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:254-259.
8. Robinson SP, McIntyre DJ, Checkley D, et al. Tumour dose response to the antivascular agent ZD6126 assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1592-1597. (Pubitemid 36713788)
9. Liu G, Rugo HS, Wilding G, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5464-5473. (Pubitemid 46300139)
10. Walker-Samuel S, Leach MO, Collins DJ. Evaluation of response to treatment using DCE-MRI: the relationship between initial area under the gadolinium curve (IAUGC) and quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:3593-3602. (Pubitemid 44026420)
11. St Lawrence KS, Lee TY. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain: I. Theoretical derivation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:1365-1377.
12. Cheng HL. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:736-743.
13. Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:993-1000. (Pubitemid 44691341)
14. Goh V, Halligan S, Gartner L, Bassett P, Bartram CI. Quantitative colorectal cancer perfusion measurement by multidetector-row CT: does greater tumour coverage improve measurement reproducibility? Br J Radiol 2006;79:578-583.
15. Song R, Loeffler RB, Hillenbrand CM. Dual navigator gated FAIR true-FISP pulse sequence for renal perfusion imaging. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. (abstract 3681).
16. Zun Z, Wong EC, Nayak KS. Arterial spin labeled myocardium perfusion imaging with background suppression. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. (abstract 997).
17. Kershaw LE, Buckley DL. Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:986-992.
18. Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, Wust P, Zimmer C. Quantitative measurement of leakage volume and permeability in gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:833-841. (Pubitemid 41579025)
19. Brix G, Kiessling F, Lucht R, et al. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:420-429. (Pubitemid 39025290)
20. Arce GR, Tian M. Order statistic filter banks. IEEE Trans Image Process 1996;5:827-837.