Defining and detecting crossover-interference mutants in yeast

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Stahl, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSING OVER; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE MUTATION; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WILD TYPE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CSM4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; MLH1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NDJ1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; MEIOSIS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84862023517     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038476     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sturtevant AH, (1915) The behavior of the chromosomes, as studied through linkage. Zeit. f. ind. Abst. u. Vereb. 13: 234-287.
2. Papazian HP, (1952) The analysis of tetrad data. Genetics 37: 175-188.
3. Stahl FW, (2008) On the "NPD ratio" as a test for crossover interference. Genetics 179: 701-704.
4. Stahl F, (2008) The phage mating theory, with lessons for yeast geneticists. Genetics 180: 1-6.
5. Malkova A, Swanson J, German M, McCusker JH, Housworth EA, et al. (2004) Gene conversion and crossing over along the 405-kb left arm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VII. Genetics 168: 49-63.
6. Viswanatha L, Housworth EA, (2005) InterferenceAnalyzer: Tools for the analysis of crossover interference in S. cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 297.
7. Housworth EA, Stahl FW, (2003) Crossover interference in humans. Am Jour Hum Genet 73: 188-197.
8. Stahl FW, Housworth EA, (2009) Methods for analysis of crossover interference in S. cerevisiae. Methods Molec Biol 557: 35-53.
9. Falque M, Anderson LK, Stack SM, Gauthier F, Martin OC, (2009) Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize. Plant Cell 21: 3915-3925.
10. Gauthier F, Martin OC, Falque M, (2011) CODA (crossover distribution analyzer): quantitative characterization of crossover position patterns along chromosomes. Bioinformatics 12: 27.
11. Muller HJ, (1916) The mechanism of crossing over. Am Nat 50 194-221 and ff.
12. Foss E, Lande R, Stahl FW, Steinberg CM, (1993) Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics 133: 681-691.
13. Stahl FW, Foss HM, Young LS, Borts RH, Abdulla MFF, et al. (2004) Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 168: 35-48.
14. Abdullah MFF, Hoffmann ER, Cotton VE, Borts RH, (2004) A role for the MutL homologue MLH2 in controlling heteroduplex formation and in regulating between two different crossover pathways in budding yeast. Cytogenet Genome Res 107: 180-190.
15. Stahl FW, Foss HM, (2010) A two-pathway analysis of meiotic crossing over and gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 186: 515-536.
16. Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder GS, (1994) Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79: 1069-1080.
17. Hollingsworth NM, Ponte L, Halsey C, (1995) Msh5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev 9: 1728-1739.
18. Argueso JL, Wanat J, Gemici Z, Alani E, (2004) Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168: 1805-1816.
19. Getz TJ, Banse SA, Young LS, Banse AV, Swanson J, et al. (2008) Reduced mismatch repair of heteroduplexes reveals "non"-interfering crossing over in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178: 1251-1269.
20. Rosu S, Libuda DE, Villeneuve AM, (2011) Robust crossover assurance and regulated interhomolog access maintain meiotic crossover number. Science 334: 1286-1289.
21. Martini E, Diaz RL, Hunter N, Keeney S, (2006) Crossover homeostasis in yeast meiosis. Cell 126: 285-295.
22. Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, Roig I, Wang R, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14: 424-430.
23. Shinohara M, Oh SD, Hunter N, Shinohara A, (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40: 299-309.
24. Perkins DD, (1949) Biochemical mutants in the fungus Ustilago maydis. Genetics 34: 607-626.
25. Wanat JJ, Kim KP, Koszul R, Zanders S, Weiner B, et al. (2008) Csm4, in collaboration with Ndj1, mediates telomere-led chromosome dynamics and recombination during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000188.