Crossover interference in humans

American Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 188-197

  Housworth, Elizabeth Ann ^a   Stahl, F W ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CROSSING OVER; DROSOPHILA; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X CHROMOSOME; YEAST; ZEBRA FISH;

ARABIDOPSIS; DANIO RERIO; DROSOPHILA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 0038389795     PISSN: 00029297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/376610     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bailey NTJ (1961) Introduction to the mathematical theory of genetic linkage. Oxford University Press, London
2. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL (1998) Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet 63:861-869
3. Broman KW, Weber JL (2000) Characterization of human crossover interference. Am J Hum Genet 66:1911-1926
4. Copenhaver GP, Housworth EA, Stahl FW (2002) Crossover interference in Arabidopsis. Genetics 160:1631-1639
5. Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, Villeneuve AM (1998) Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for chromosome synapsis. Cell 94:387-398
6. Foss E, Lande R, Stahl FW, Steinberg CM (1993) Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance. Genetics 133:681-691
7. Gerton JL, DeRisi JL (2002) Mnd1p: an evolutionarily conserved protein required for meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6895-6900
8. Goldgar DE, Fain PR (1988) Models of multilocus recombination: nonrandomness in chiasma number of crossover positions. Am J Hum Genet 43:38-45
9. Goldgar DE, Fain PR, Kimerling WJ (1989) Chiasma-based models of multilocus recombination: increased power for exclusion mapping and gene ordering. Genomics 5:283-290
10. 2 models of recombination for exclusion mapping and gene ordering. Genomics 27:265-273
11. Hawley RS (1980) Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics 94:625-646
12. Kaback DB, Barber D, Mahon J, Lamb J, You J (1999) Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics 152:1475-1486
13. Lin S, Speed TP (1999) Relative efficiencies of the chi-square recombination models for gene mapping with human pedigree data. Ann Hum Genet 63:81-95
14. Liu H, Jang JK, Kato N, McKim KS (2002) mei-P22 encodes a chromosome-associated protein required for the initiation of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162:245-258
15. Loidl J, Klein F, Scherthan H (1994) Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast. J Cell Biol 125:1191-1200
16. McKim KS, Peters K, Rose AM (1993) Two types of sites required for meiotic chromosome pairing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 134:749-768
17. McPeek MS, Speed TP (1995) Modeling interference in genetic recombination. Genetics 139:1031-1044
18. Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, Spyropoulos B (2002) The time course and chromosomal location of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci 115:1611-1622
19. Mortimer RK, Fogel S (1974) Genefical interference and gene conversion. In: Grell RF (ed) Mechanisms in recombination. Plenum Press, New York, pp 263-275
20. Page SL, Hawley RS (2001) c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev 15:3130-3143
21. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1986) Numerical recipes in Fortran. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
22. Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD (2000) The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6:975-987
23. Ross-Macdonald P, Roeder GC (1994) Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79:1069-1080
24. Singleton JR (1953) Chromosome morphology and the chromosomal cycle in the ascus of Neurospora crassa. Am J Bot 40:124-144
25. Takanami T, Mori A, Takahashi H, Higashitani A (2000) Hyperresistance of meiotic cells to radiation due to a strong expression of a single recA-like gene in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res 28:4232-4236
26. Villeneuve AM (1994) A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136:887-902
27. Walker MY, Hawley RS (2000) Hanging on to your homolog: the roles of pairing, synapsis and recombination in the maintenance of homolog adhesion. Chromosoma 109:3-9
28. Weeks DE, Lathrop GM, Ott J (1993) Multipoint mapping under genetic interference. Hum Hered 43:86-97
29. Weiner BM, Kleckner N (1994) Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell 77:977-991
30. Xu L, Weiner BM, Kleckner N (1997) Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev 11:106-118
31. Zalevsky J, MacQueen AJ, Duffy JB, Kemphues KJ, Villeneuve AM (1999) Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics 153:1271-1291
32. Zhao H, McPeek MS, Speed TP (1995a) Statistical analysis of chromatid interference. Genetics 139:1057-1065
33. 2 model. Genetics 139: 1045-1056
34. Zickler D, Kleckner N (1998) The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. Ann Rev Genet 32:619-697