BioWord: A sequence manipulation suite for Microsoft Word

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Anzaldi, Laura J ^a   Muñoz Fernández, Daniel ^b   Erill, Ivan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCES; EDUCATIONAL PLATFORMS; FREQUENT SWITCHING; MANIPULATION TOOLS; MICROSOFT WORD; MOTIF DISCOVERY; OBJECT ORIENTED; OPEN SOURCES; PROCESSING SOFTWARE; PROGRAMMING EXPERIENCE; PROTEIN SEQUENCES; SCRIPTING LANGUAGES; SELF-INSTALLING; VISUAL BASIC FOR APPLICATIONS; WEB SERVERS; WIDE SWATH;

BIOINFORMATICS; DNA; OPEN SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PACKAGES; VISUAL BASIC; WORD PROCESSING;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84861902481     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-124     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Neerincx PB, Leunissen JA. Evolution of web services in bioinformatics. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2005, 6(2):178-188.
2. Navas-Delgado I, Rojano-Munoz Mdel M, Ramirez S, Perez AJ, Andres Leon E, Aldana-Montes JF, Trelles O. Intelligent client for integrating bioinformatics services. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006, 22(1):106-111.
3. Carver T, Bleasby A. The design of Jemboss: a graphical user interface to EMBOSS. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2003, 19(14):1837-1843.
4. Subramaniam S. The Biology Workbench-a seamless database and analysis environment for the biologist. Proteins 1998, 32(1):1-2.
5. Basu MK. SeWeR: a customizable and integrated dynamic HTML interface to bioinformatics services. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2001, 17(6):577-578.
6. Bare JC, Shannon PT, Schmid AK, Baliga NS. The Firegoose: two-way integration of diverse data from different bioinformatics web resources with desktop applications. BMC Bioinforma 2007, 8:456.
7. Shahid M, Alam I, Fuellen G. Biotool2Web: creating simple Web interfaces for bioinformatics applications. Appl Bioinforma 2006, 5(1):63-66.
8. Womble DD. GCG: The Wisconsin Package of sequence analysis programs. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2000, 132:3-22.
9. Burland TG. DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2000, 132:71-91.
10. Stothard P. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 2000, 28(6):1102-1104.
11. Molecular Toolkit http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/molkit/, Molecular Toolkit.
12. ISO/IEC Information technology -- Document description and processing languages -- Office Open XML File Formats. 2008, International Organization for Standardization, 1, ISO/IEC.
13. OpenXMLDeveloper http://openxmldeveloper.org/blog/b/openxmldeveloper/archive/2009/08/07/7293.aspx, OpenXMLDeveloper.
14. Lipman DJ, Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science (New York, NY) 1985, 227(4693):1435-1441.
15. Fristensky B. Feature expressions: creating and manipulating sequence datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 1993, 21(25):5997-6003.
16. Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T. Codon usage tabulated from the international DNA sequence databases. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(1):244-245.
17. Cornish-Bowden A. Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences: recommendations 1984. Nucleic Acids Res 1985, 13(9):3021-3030.
18. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982, 157(1):105-132.
19. Schneider TD. Information Content of Individual Genetic Sequences. J Theor Biol 1997, 189(4):427-441.
20. Stormo GD, Fields DS. Specificity, free energy and information content in protein-DNA interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 1998, 23(3):109-113.
21. Erill I, O'Neill MC. A reexamination of information theory-based methods for DNA-binding site identification. BMC Bioinforma 2009, 10(1):57.
22. Erill I, Escribano M, Campoy S, Barbe J. In silico analysis reveals substantial variability in the gene contents of the gamma proteobacteria LexA-regulon. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2003, 19(17):2225-2236.
23. Schneider TD. Consensus sequence Zen. Appl Bioinforma 2002, 1(3):111-119.
24. Schneider TD, Stephens RM. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1990, 18(20):6097-6100.
25. Erill I, Jara M, Salvador N, Escribano M, Campoy S, Barbe J. Differences in LexA regulon structure among Proteobacteria through in vivo assisted comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(22):6617-6626.
26. Hertz GZ, Hartzell GW, Stormo GD. Identification of consensus patterns in unaligned DNA sequences known to be functionally related. Comput Appl Biosci 1990, 6(2):81-92.
27. Lawrence CE, Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Liu JS, Neuwald AF, Wootton JC. Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science (New York, NY) 1993, 262(5131):208-214.
28. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981, 147(1):195-197.
29. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48(3):443-453.
30. Bailey TL, Elkan C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; ISMB 1994, 2:28-36.
31. Luo Y, Pfuetzner RA, Mosimann S, Paetzel M, Frey EA, Cherney M, Kim B, Little JW, Strynadka NC. Crystal structure of LexA: a conformational switch for regulation of self-cleavage. Cell 2001, 106(5):585-594.
32. Munch R, Hiller K, Barg H, Heldt D, Linz S, Wingender E, Jahn D. PRODORIC: prokaryotic database of gene regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(1):266-269.