Weighted multiple testing procedures for genomic studies

BioData Mining

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Gui, Jiang ^a,c   Tosteson, Tor D ^a   Borsuk, Mark ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Family wise error rate; Genomic studies

Indexed keywords

BONFERRONI METHOD; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; NULL HYPOTHESIS; POWER ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 84861889659     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0381-5-4     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Bonferroni CE, Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste Italy, Rome 1935 13 60
2. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y, J R Stat Soc B 1995 57 289 300
3. A direct approach to false discovery rates. Storey JD, J R Stat Soc Ser B 2002 64 479 498 10.1111/1467-9868.00346
4. The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Storey JD, Ann Stat 2003 31 2013 2035 10.1214/aos/1074290335 (Pubitemid 38293903)
5. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V, JASA 2001 96 456 1151 1160 (Pubitemid 33695570)
6. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: the choice of a null hypothesis. Efron B, JASA 2004 99 96 104 (Pubitemid 38545197)
7. Efron B, Size, Power and False Discovery Rates Statistics Department, Stanford University, 2004 2004
8. False discovery control with p-value weighting. Genovese CR, Roeder K, Wasserman L, Biometrika 2006 93 509 524 10.1093/biomet/93.3.509 (Pubitemid 44599847)
9. Genome-Wide Significance Levels and Weighted Hypothesis Testing. Roeder K, Wasserman L, Stat Sci 2009 24 398 411 10.1214/09-STS289 20711421
10. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Holm S, Scand J Stat 1979 6 65 70
11. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, Ann Stat 2001 29 4 1165 1188 10.1214/aos/1013699998 (Pubitemid 33575263)
12. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting. Rubin D, Dudoit S, van der Laan M, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2006 5 rticle 19
13. Improving power in genome-wide association studies: weights tip the scale. Roeder K, Devlin B, Wasserman L, Genet Epidemiol 2007 31 741 747 10.1002/gepi.20237 17549760 (Pubitemid 350133973)
14. Multi-weighting for FDR control. Roquain E, van de Wiel M, Electron J Stat 2009 3 678 711 10.1214/09-EJS430
15. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies. Sun L, Craiu RV, Paterson AD, Bull SB, Genet Epidemiol 2006 30 519 530 10.1002/gepi.20164 16800000 (Pubitemid 44267168)
16. Genetic variation at the ACE gene is associated with persistent microalbuminuria and severe nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: the DCCT/EDIC Genetics Study. Boright AP, Paterson AD, Mirea L, Bull SB, Mowjoodi A, Scherer SW, Zinman B, DCCT/EDIC Research Group, Diabetes 2005 54 1238 1244 10.2337/diabetes.54.4.1238 15793268 (Pubitemid 40446343)
17. Using linkage genome scans to improve power of association in genome scans. Roeder K, Bacanu S-A, Wasserman L, Devlin B, Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 243 252 10.1086/500026 16400608 (Pubitemid 43157564)
18. Multiple testing corrections for imputed SNPs. Gao X, Genet Epidemiol 2011 35 154 158 10.1002/gepi.20563 21254223
19. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Nyholt DR, Am J Hum Genet 2004 74 765 769 10.1086/383251 14997420 (Pubitemid 38420107)
20. Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analysis using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Li J, Ji L, Heredity 2005 95 221 227 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800717 16077740 (Pubitemid 43093236)
21. So many correlated tests, so little time! Rapid adjustment of p values for multiple correlated traits. Conneely KN, Boehnke M, Am J Hum Genet 2007 81 1158 1168 10.1086/522036 17966093 (Pubitemid 350211447)
22. Rapid and accurate multiple testing correction and power estimation for millions of correlated markers. Han B, Kang HM, Eskin E, PLoS Genet 2009 5 4 1000456 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000456 19381255
23. Estimation of significance thresholds for genome wide association scans. Dudbridge F, Gusnanto A, Genet Epidemiol 2008 32 227 234 10.1002/gepi.20297 18300295 (Pubitemid 351550369)