The Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights: Four Learned Lessons and Four Theses

Global Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 137-149

  Archibugi, Daniele ^a,c   Filippetti, Andrea ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861787680     PISSN: 17585880     EISSN: 17585899     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Andersen, B. (2004) 'If "Intellectual Property Right is the Answer", What is the Question? Revisiting the Patent Controversies', Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13 (5), pp. 417-442.
2. Archibugi, D. and Iammarino, S. (2002) 'The Globalization of Technological Innovation: Definition and Evidence', Review of International Political Economy, 9 (1), pp. 98-122.
3. Archibugi, D. and Pietrobelli, C. (2003) 'The Globalisation of Technology and its Implications for Developing Countries: Windows of Opportunity or Further Burden?', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70 (9), pp. 861-884.
4. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Arrow, K. (1962) 'Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention', in R. R. Nelson (ed.), Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 165-180.
6. Barton, J. H. (2000) 'Reforming the Patent System', Science, 287 (5460), pp. 1933-1934.
7. Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. (1997) 'Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries', in D. Archibugi and J. Michie (eds), Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83-137.
8. Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. J. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Blind, K., Edler, J., Schmoch, U., Anderson, B., Howells, J., Miles, I., et al. (2003) Patents in the Service Industries. Fraunhofer: Institute System and Innovation Research.
10. Boyle, J. (2003) 'The Second Enclosures Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain', Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1/2), pp. 33-74.
11. Branstetter, L. G., Fishman, R. and Foley, C. F. (2004) 'Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from US Firm-Level Panel Data', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (1), pp. 321-349.
12. Chang, H.-J. (2003) Kicking Away the Ladder: Policies and Institutions for Economic Development in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.
13. Chen, Y. and Puttitanum, T. (2005) 'Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries', Journal of Development Economics, 78 (2), pp. 474-493.
14. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989) 'Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D', Economic Journal, 99 (397), pp. 569-596.
16. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) 'Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
17. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2000) 'Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not)'. NBER Working Paper 7552.
18. David, P. (2000) 'A Tragedy of the Public Knowledge "Commons"'. Working Paper.
19. Drahos, P. (1995) 'Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS and the GATT', Prometheus, 11 (1), pp. 6-19.
20. Drahos, P. and Mayne, R. (2002) Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access and Development. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
21. European Commission (2007) Europe in the Global Research Landscape. Brussels: European Commission.
22. Filippetti, A. (2009) 'Managing Design within the Innovative Processes of Firms: A Multiple Case Study across the Italian Industries'. SSRN Working Paper.
23. Freeman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
24. Gallini, N. (2002) 'The Economics of Patents: Lessons from the Recent US Patent Reform', Journal of Economic Perspective, 16 (2), pp. 131-154.
25. Gleick, J. (2003) 'The Crisis in the US Patent Office', New York Times Magazine, 29 July, p. 644.
26. Guy, F. (2007) 'Strategic Bundling: Information Products, Market Power, and the Future of Globalization', Review of International Political Economy, 14 (1), pp. 26-48.
27. Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R. H. (2001) 'The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry', RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), pp. 101-128.
28. Hardin, G. (1968) 'The Tragedy of the Commons', Science, 162 (3859), pp. 1243-1248.
29. Heller, M. (2008) The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives. New York: Basic Books.
30. Heller, M. A. and Eisenberg, R. S. (1998) 'Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research', Science, 280 (5364), pp. 698-701.
31. Hess, C. and Ostrom, E. (2006) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Hou, C. and San, G. (1993) 'Nation Systems Supporting Technical Advance in Industry: The Case of Taiwan', in R. R. Nelson (ed.), National Innovation Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 384-413.
33. Jaffe, A. B. and Lerner, J. (2004) Innovation and Its Discontents: How our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What To Do about It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Khan, Z. (2002) 'Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Lessons from American and European Industry'. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Study Paper 1a.
35. Lall, S. (2003) 'Indicators of the Relative Importance of IPRs in Developing Countries', Research Policy, 32 (9), pp. 1657-1680.
36. Lanoszka, A. (2003) 'The Global Politics of Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceutical Drug Policies in Developing Countries', International Political Science Review, 24 (2), pp. 181-197.
37. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002) 'Some Simple Economics of Open Source', The Journal of Industrial Economy, 50 (2), pp. 197-234.
38. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987) 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development', Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 3, pp. 783-831.
39. Lieberman, J. I. (2004) Offshore Outsourcing and America's Competitive Edge. United States Senate.
40. Macmillan, F. (2006) 'Public Interest and the Public Domain in an Era of Corporate Dominance', in B. Andersen (ed.), Public Interest and the Public Domain in an Era of Corporate Dominance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 46-69.
41. Mansfield, E. (1986) 'Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study', Management Science, 32 (2), pp. 173-181.
42. Mansfield, E. (1994) 'Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer'. World Bank Discussion Paper no. 19.
43. Mansfield, E. (1995) 'Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan and the United States'. World Bank Discussion Paper no. 27.
44. Maskus, K. E. (2000) Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
45. Maskus, K. E. and Reichman, J. H. (2005) International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. May, C. (2002a) The Information Society: A Sceptical View. Cambridge: Polity Press.
47. May, C. (2002b) 'The Venetian Moment: New Technologies, Legal Innovation and the Institutional Origins of Intellectual Property', Prometheus, 20 (2), pp. 159-179.
48. May, C. and Sell, S. (2006) Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. London: Lynne Rienner.
49. Merges, R. P. and Nelson, R. (1990) 'On the Complex Economy of Patent Scope', Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), pp. 839-916.
50. Mokyr, J. (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Morishima, M. (1982) Why has Japan 'Succeeded'? Western Technology and the Japanese Ethos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Moser, P. (2005) 'How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs', The American Economic Review, 95 (4), pp. 1214-1236.
53. Mowery, D. and Oxley, J. (1997) 'Inward Technology Transfer and Competitiveness: The Role of National Innovation Systems', in D. Archibugi and J. Michie (eds), Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138-171.
54. Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. (1989) Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Mowery, D. C. and Sampat, B. N. (2004) 'The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?', The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30 (1-2), pp. 115-127.
56. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Nelson, R. and Wright, G. (1992) 'The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective', Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (4), pp. 1931-1964.
58. Ordover, J. A. (1991) 'A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), pp. 43-60.
59. Park, W. G. and Ginarte, J. C. (1997) 'Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth', Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, pp. 51-61.
60. Pavitt, K. (1987) 'The Objectives of Technology Policy', Science and Public Policy, 14, pp. 182-188.
61. Pianta, M. (1988) New Technologies across the Atlantic: US Leadership or European Autonomy. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
62. Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
63. Rosenberg, N. and Steinmueller, E. (1988) 'Why are Americans such Poor Imitators?', American Economic Review, 78 (2), pp. 229-234.
64. Ryan, M. R. (1998) Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
65. Sell, S. K. (2003) Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Shiva, V. (2001) Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books.
67. Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. (2006) Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. London: Atlantic Books.
68. Teece, D. J. (1986) 'Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy', Research Policy, 15 (6), pp. 285-305.
69. UNCTAD (2005) World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York: UNCTAD.
70. US Department of Commerce (2009) Bureau of Economic Analysis. Available from: http://www.bea.gov [accessed 14 July 2009].
71. Von Hippel, E. (1998) The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
72. Westphal, L. E., Kim, L. and Dahlam, C. (1985) 'Reflections on the Republic of Korea's Acquisition of Technological Capability', in N. Rosenberg and C. R. Frischtak (eds), International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures, and Comparisons. New York: Praeger, pp. 38-89.
73. Winter, S. (1987) 'Knowledge and Competences as Strategic Assets', in D. A. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 159-176.
74. Wong, J. (2004) 'The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia', Journal of East Asian Studies, 4, pp. 345-362.
75. Woo-Cumings, M. (1999) The Developmental State. New York: Cornell University Press.
76. World Bank (2001) Intellectual Property: Balancing Incentives with Competitive Access. New York: World Bank.
77. World Trade Organisation (2009) Dispute Settlement. Available from: http://www.wto.org [accessed 14 July 2009].
78. Ziedonis, R. H. (2004) 'Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms', Management Science, 50 (6), pp. 804-820.