Nation-Level Indicators of Gender Equity in Psychological Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 145-148

  Hyde, Janet Shibley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861763903     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: 14716402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0361684312441448     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Buss D. M.Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1-14.
2. Eagly A. H.,Wood W.The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.American Psychologist. 1999;54:408-423.
3. Else-Quest N. M.,Grabe S.The political is personal: Measurement and application of nation-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2012;36:131-144.
4. Else-Quest N. M.,Hyde J. S.,Linn M. C.Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 2010;136:103-127.
5. Enns C. Z.Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies. 2004). Feminist theories and feminist psychotherapies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Haworth.New York, NY: Haworth:.
6. Fiske S. T.Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping.American Psychologist. 1993;48:621-628.
7. Fiske S. T.The use and abuse of power. Lee-Chai A.Bargh J., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2001:181-193.
8. Fryer R. G.,Levitt S. D.An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010;2:210-240.
9. Kane J. M.,Mertz J. E.Debunking myths about gender and mathematics performance.Notices of the AMS. 2012;59:10-21.
10. Keltner D.,Gruenfeld D. H.,Anderson C.Power, approach, and inhibition.Psychological Review. 2003;110:265-284.
11. Millett K.Sexual politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; 1969:.
12. Pratto F.,Stallworth L. M.,Sidanius J.,Siers B.The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:37-53.
13. Rosenthal L.,Levy S. R.Understanding women's risk for HIV infection using social dominance theory and the four bases of gendered power.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2010;34:21-35.
14. Sidanius J.,Pratto F.Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
15. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
16. Yoder J. D.,Kahn A. S.Toward a feminist understanding of women and power.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1992;16:381-388.