Comparing the mid-vastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of short term outcomes

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 229-236

  Alcelik, Ilhan ^a   Sukeik, Mohamed ^b   Pollock, Raymond ^c   Misra, Anand ^a   Naguib, Ashraf ^a   Haddad, Fares S ^b  

^a WEST CUMBERLAND HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^c Medistats   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Approach; Medial parapatellar; Mid vastus; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART INFARCTION; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LUNG EMBOLISM; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861704371     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.010     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Kelly M.J., Rumi M.N., Kothari M., Parentis M.A., Bailey K.J., Parrish W.M., et al. Comparison of the vastus-splitting and median parapatellar approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 Apr, 88(4):715-720.
2. Engh G.A., Holt B.T., Parks N.L. A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997 Apr, 12(3):322-331.
3. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales 6th Annual Report 2009, 72.
4. Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. 2006 Sept [updated September 2009].
5. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009 Jul 21, 6(7):e1000097.
6. Handoll H., Elstub L. About the Cochrane collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGS)) 2008, J E. Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group, 4. Art. No: MUSKINJ.
7. Chin P.L., Foo L.S., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., Lo N.N. Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007 Sep, 22(6):800-806.
8. Dalury D.F., Snow R.G., Adams M.J. Electromyographic evaluation of the midvastus approach. J Arthroplasty 2008 Jan, 23(1):136-140.
9. Karachalios T., Giotikas D., Roidis N., Poultsides L., Bargiotas K., Malizos K.N. Total knee replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 May, 90(5):584-591.
10. Kolisek F.R., Bonutti P.M., Hozack W.J., Purtill J., Sharkey P.F., Zelicof S.B., et al. Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. J Arthroplasty 2007 Jan, 22(1):8-13.
11. Pei-liang FX-h L., Yu-li W. Comparison of midvastus and standard medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu Yu Linchuang Kangfu 2008, 12(9):1793-1796.
12. Hozo S.P., Djulbegovic B., Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005, 5(1):13.
13. Karpman R.R., Smith H.L. Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009 Aug, 24(5):681-688.
14. Bathis H., Perlick L., Blum C., Luring C., Perlick C., Grifka J. Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005 Oct, 13(7):545-550.
15. Hernandez-Vaquero D., Noriega-Fernandez A., Suarez-Vazquez A. Total knee arthroplasties performed with a mini-incision or a standard incision. Similar results at six months follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Feb, 11:27.
16. Kang S.B., Yoon K.S., Lee J.H., HC J The comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Knee Soc 2004, 16:39-43.
17. Jung Won-Hwa, Ha Yong-Chan, Cha M.-S. A comparison of the midvastus and median parapatellar surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2007, 42:354-359.
18. Kim JG, Lee SW, Ha JK, Choi HJ, Yang SJ, Lee MY. The effectiveness of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty to preserve quadriceps strength: a randomized controlled trial. Knee. 2010 Sept; 10.
19. Nestor BJ, Toulson CE, Backus SI, Lyman SL, Foote KL, Windsor RE. Mini-midvastus vs standard medial parapatellar approach: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sept;25(6 Suppl):5-11, e1.
20. Walter F., Haynes M.B., Markel D.C. A randomized prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on the early functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007 Jun, 22(4):509-514.
21. Schneider JM B.J., Glockner F., Melnikoff J., Fletcher F. The vastus medialis muscle-splitting approach: a technique for total knee arthroplasty. Knee 1998, 5(3):183-186.
22. Juosponis R., Tarasevicius S., Smailys A., Kalesinskas R.J. Functional and radiological outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop 2009 Oct, 33(5):1233-1237.
23. Keating E.M., Faris P.M., Meding J.B., Ritter M.A. Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999 Jan, 14(1):29-32.
24. Gelfer Y., Pinkas L., Horne T., Halperin N., Alk D., Robinson D. Symptomatic transient patellar ischemia following total knee replacement as detected by scintigraphy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the mid-vastus to the medial para-patellar approach. Knee Dec 2003, 10(4):341-345.
25. Komatsu T., Ishibashi Y., Otsuka H., Nagao A., Toh S. The effect of surgical approaches and tourniquet application on patellofemoral tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003 Apr, 18(3):308-312.
26. Ozkoc G., Hersekli M.A., Akpinar S., Ozalay M., Uysal M., Cesur N., et al. Time dependent changes in patellar tracking with medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005 Nov, 13(8):654-657.
27. Parentis M.A., Rumi M.N., Deol G.S., Kothari M., Parrish W.M., Pellegrini V.D. A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999 Oct, 367:107-116.
28. Dalury D.F., Jiranek W.A. A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999 Jan, 14(1):33-37.
29. White R.E., Allman J.K., Trauger J.A., Dales B.H. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999 Oct, 367:117-122.
30. Scuderi G.R., Tenholder M., Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 Nov, 428:61-67.
31. Engh G.A., Parks N.L., Ammeen D.J. Influence of surgical approach on lateral retinacular releases in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996 Oct, 331:56-63.
32. Xu Yinglong, Zhao Jinmin, Li Shuzhen, Ding Xiaofei, Taixiang W. Midvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Chin J Evid-Based Med 2010, 10(5):585-591.
33. Engh G.A., Parks N.L. Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998 Jun, 351:270-274.