Midvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 585-591

  Xu, Ying Long ^a   Zhao, Jin Min ^a   Li, Shu Zhen ^a   Ding, Xiao Fei ^a   Wu, Tai Xiang ^b  

^a GUANGXI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Medial parapatellar approach; Midvastus approach; Systematic review; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDIAL PARAPATELLAR APPROACH; META ANALYSIS; MIDVASTUS APPROACH; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 77957316005     PISSN: 16722531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Carol JD, Christine AL, Verita CB, et al. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. National Health Statistics Report, 2008, July 30, Number 5.
2. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridage CM, et al. Patient Outcomes after Knee Replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 356: 93-110.
3. Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, et al. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1993, 75: 674-681.
4. Stuart MJ, Larson JE, Morrey BF. Reoperation after condylar revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, 286: 168-173. (Pubitemid 23059483)
5. Aaron GR, Joshua JJ, Khaled GS, et al. The patella in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85: 63-69.
6. Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty, 1987, 2: 135-140.
7. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1991, 269: 70-77.
8. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12: 322-331. (Pubitemid 29021334)
9. Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, et al. Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. The Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 2006, 14(1): 47-52.
10. Bassarir K, Erdemli B, Tuccar E, et al. Safe zone for the descending genicular artery in the midvastus approach to the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 451: 96-100. (Pubitemid 44511312)
11. Dalury DF, Jiranek WA. A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1999, 14(1): 33-37.
12. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
13. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Blum C, et al. Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2005, 13(7): 545-550.
14. Fu PL, Li XH, Wu YL, et al. Comparison of midvastus and standard medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 2008, 12(9): 1793-1796.
15. Keating EM, Faris PM, et al. Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1999, 14(1): 29-32. (Pubitemid 29042740)
16. Kelly MJ, Rumi MN, Kothari M, et al. Comparison of the Vastus- Splitting and Median Parapatellar Approaches for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(4): 715-720.
17. Walter F, Haynes MB, Markel DC, et al. A randomized prospective study evaluating the effect of patellar eversion on the early functional outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2007, 22(4): 509-514. (Pubitemid 46880176)
18. White RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, et al. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1999, (367): 117-122.
19. McMahon MS, Scudefi GR, Glashow JL, et al. Scintigraphic determination of patellar viability after excision of infrapatellar fat pad and/ or lateral retinacular release in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1990, (260): 10-16.
20. Maestro A, Suarez MA, Rodriguez L, et al. The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 2000, 24(2): 104-107.