Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 545-550

  Bäthis, Holger ^a   Perlick, Lars ^a   Blum, Christian ^a   Lüring, Christian ^a   Perlick, Carsten ^b   Grifka, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Midvastus approach; Proprioception; Randomized controlled trial; Strength; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROPRIOCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATELLA; PROPRIOCEPTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 26444596640     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0574-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB (1993) Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:674-681
2. Brick GW, Scott RD (1988) The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:163-178
3. Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M, Tan J, Simsek SA, Kanatli U, Ozturk A (2002) Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:65-68
4. Cooper RE, Trinidad G, Buck WR (1999) Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a description and a cadaveric study determining the distance of the popliteal artery from the patellar margin of the incision. J Arthroplasty 14:505-508
5. Dalury DF, Jiranek WA (1999) A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:33-37
6. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL (1997) A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:322-331
7. Engh GA, Parks NL (1998) Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop 351:270-274
8. Engh GA, Parks NL, Ammeen DJ (1996) Influence of surgical approach on lateral retinacular releases in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 331:56-63
9. Faure BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B, Volz RG, Schutte D (1993) Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:511-516
10. Fisher DA, Trimble SM, Breedlove K (1998) The medial trivector approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 21:53-56
11. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE (1991) Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:70-77
12. Holtby RM, Grosso P (1996) Osteonecrosis and resorption of the patella after total knee replacement: a case report. Clin Orthop 328:155-158
13. Kayler DE, Lyttle D (1988) Surgical interruption of patellar blood supply by total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 229:221-227
14. Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Ritter MA (1999) Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:29-32
15. Keblish PA (2002) Alternate surgical approaches in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25:257-264
16. Laskin RS (1976) Modular total knee-replacement arthroplasty. A review of eighty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:766-773
17. Lord SR, Menz HB, Tiedemann A (2003) A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther 83:237-252
18. Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (1987) Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:135-140
19. Maestro A, Suarez MA, Rodriguez L, Guerra C, Murcia A (2000) The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 24:104-107
20. Parentis MA, Rumi MN, Deol GS, Kothari M, Parrish WM, Pellegrini VD (1999) A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:107-116
21. Riley LH, Hungerford DS (1978) Geometric total knee replacement for treatment of the rheumatoid knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:523-527
22. Roysam GS, Oakley MJ (2001) Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty 16:454-457
23. Scapinelli R, Aglietti P, Baldovin M, Giron F, Teitge R (2002) Biologic resurfacing of the patella: current status. Clin Sports Med 21:547-573
24. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G (1988) Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1163-1173
25. Scuderi G, Scharf SC, Meltzer L, Nisonson B, Scott WN (1987) Evaluation of patella viability after disruption of the arterial circulation. Am J Sports Med 15:490-493
26. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Pratt JA, McClung CD, Schmalzried TP (2003) Knee strength after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:605-611
27. White RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH (1999) Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop 367:117-122