A taxonomy of site response complexity

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 41, Issue , 2012, Pages 32-43

  Thompson, Eric M ^a   Baise, Laurie G ^a   Tanaka, Yasuo ^b   Kayen, Robert E ^c  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Seismic analysis; Seismic effects; Soil properties

Indexed keywords

ACROSS DISTANCE; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; DOWNHOLES; FIELD INVESTIGATION; FIELD OBSERVATIONS; LATERAL VARIATIONS; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ARRAYS; SEISMIC EFFECT; SITE RESPONSE; SOIL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL; SOIL PROPERTY; SURFACE ACCELERATION; VELOCITY PROFILES;

DATA REDUCTION; TAXONOMIES;

SEISMOLOGY;

COMPLEXITY; GEOPHYSICAL ARRAY; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; SEISMIC DATA; SOIL MECHANICS; SOIL PROPERTY; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 84861611200     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. O'Connell D.R.H. Replication of apparent nonlinear seismic response with linear wave propagation models. Science 1999, 283(5410):2045-2050.
2. Thompson E.M., Baise L.G., Kayen R.E., Guzina B.B. Impediments to predicting site response: seismic property estimation and modeling simplifications. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2009, 99(5):2927-2949.
3. Bradley B.A. A framework for validation of seismic response analyses using seismometer array recordings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2011, 31(3):512-520.
4. Baise L.G., Dreger D.S., Glaser S.D. The effect of shallow San Francisco Bay sediments on waveforms recorded during the Mw 4.6 Bolinas, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003, 93(1):465-479.
5. Frankel AD, Stephenson WJ, Carver DL, Williams RA, Odum JK, Rhea S. Seismic hazard maps for Seattle, Washington, incorporating 3D sedimentary basin effects, nonlinear site response, and rupture directivity. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1175; 2007. p. 77.
6. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB. SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Technical Report Rept. EERC 72-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley; 1972.
7. Choi Y., Stewart J.P. Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30m shear wave velocity. Earthquake Spectra 2005, 21(1):1-30.
8. Kwok A.O.L., Stewart J.P., Hashash Y.M.A. Nonlinear ground-response analysis of Turkey flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008, 98(1):331-343.
9. Assimaki D., Steidl J., Liu P.C. Attenuation and velocity structure for site response analyses via downhole seismogram inversion. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2006, 163(1):81-118.
10. Aoi S., Obara K., Hori S., Kasahara K., Okada Y. New Japanese uphole-downhole strong-motion observation network: KiK-Net. Seismological Research Letters 2000, 72:239.
11. Beresnev I.A., Wen K.L. Nonlinear soil response-a reality?. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1996, 86(6):1964-1978.
12. Shearer P.M., Orcutt J.A. Surface and near-surface effects on seismic-waves-theory and borehole seismometer results. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1987, 77(4):1168-1196.
13. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering 1993, Prentice Hall.
14. Thomson W.T. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid. Journal of Applied Physics 1950, 21:89-93.
15. Haskell N.A. The dispersion of surface waves on multilayered media. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1953, 72:17-34.
16. Boore DM. SMSIM-Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes: version 2.3. A revision of U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-80-A:55; 2005.
17. Boore DM. Some thoughts on relating density to velocity 〈〉. 2008 [Accessed 24 April 2008]. http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/~boore/daves_notes/daves_notes_on_relating_density_to_velocity_v1.2.pdf.
18. Hardin B.O., Drnevich V.P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: measurement and parameter effects. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE 1972, 98:603-624.
19. Joyner W.B., Chen A.T.F. Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1975, 65(5):1315-1336.
20. Shibuya S., Mitachi T., Fukuda F., Degoshi T. Strain-rate effects on shear modulus and damping of normally consolidated clay. Geotechnical Testing Journal 1995, 18(3):365-375.
21. Rix G., Meng J. A non-resonance method for measuring dynamic soil properties. Geotechnical Testing Journal 2005, 28(1):1-8.
22. Khan Z.H., Cascante G., El Naggar M.H., Lai C.G. Measurement of frequency-dependent dynamic properties of soils using the resonant-column device. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2008, 134(9):1319-1326.
23. Blakeslee S., Malin P. High-frequency site effects at 2 Parkfield downhole and surface stations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1991, 81(2):332-345.
24. Fukushima Y., Kinoshita S., Sato H. Measurement of Q-1 for S waves in mudstone at Chikura, Japan-comparison of incident and reflected phases in borehole seismograms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1992, 82(1):148-163.
25. Satoh T., Kawase H., Sato T. Evaluation of local site effects and their removal from borehole records observed in the Sendai region, Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1995, 85(6):1770-1789.
26. Kokusho T., Aoyagi T., Wakunami A. In situ soil-specific nonlinear properties back-calculated from vertical array records during 1995 Kobe earthquake. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2005, 131(12):1509-1521.
27. Kokusho T., Sato K. Surface-to-base amplification evaluated from KiK-net vertical array strong motion records. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(9):707-716.
28. Sato T, Kawase H. Finite element simulation of seismic wave propagation in near-surface random media. In: Proceedings of international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, Odawara; Japan 1992. p. 257-62.
29. Kokusho T, Mantani S. Seismic amplification evaluation in a very deep down-hole. In: 12th European conference on earthquake engineering; 2002 [Paper Reference 797].
30. Kausel E., Assimaki D. Seismic simulation of inelastic soils via frequency-dependent moduli and damping. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002, 128(1):34-47.
31. Yoshida N., Kobayashi S., Suetomi I., Miura K. Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002, 22(3):205-222.
32. Meng J. Earthquake ground motion simulation with frequency-dependent soil properties. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2007, 27(3):234-241.
33. Park D., Hashash Y.M.A. Rate-dependent soil behavior in seismic site response analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2008, 45(4):454-469.
34. Steidl J.H., Tumarkin A.G., Archuleta R.J. What is a reference site?. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1996, 86(6):1733-1748.
35. Boore D.M., Watson-Lamprey J., Abrahamson N.A. Orientation-independent measures of ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2006, 94(4A):1502-1511.
36. Boore DM. TSPP-a collection of FORTRAN programs for processing and manipulating time series. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1111.
37. Nazarian S, Stokoe KH. In-situ shear wave velocities from spectral analysis of surface waves. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol. III. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1984. p. 31-8.
38. Lai CG, Rix GJ. Simultaneous inversion of Rayleigh phase velocity and attenuation for near-surface site characterization. Technical Report, Georgia Institude of Technology; 1998.
39. Hisada Y. An efficient method for computing Green's functions for a layered half-space with sources and receivers close depths (part 2). Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1995, 85:1080-1093.
40. Constable S.C., Parker R.L., Constable C.G. Occams inversion-a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 1987, 52:289-300.
41. Brown L.T., Boore D.M., Stokoe K.H. Comparison of shear-wave slowness profiles at 10 strong-motion sites from noninvasive SASW measurements and measurements made in boreholes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002, 52:289-300.
42. Boore D.M., Asten M.W. Comparisons of shear-wave slowness in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from blind interpretations of data from a comprehensive set of invasive and non-invasive methods using active- and passive-sources. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008, 98:1982-2003.
43. Legates D.R., McCabe G.J. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 1999, 35(1):233-241.
44. Mebane W.R., Sekhon J.S. Genetic optimization using derivatives: the rgenoud package for R. Journal of Statistical Software 2011, 42(11):1-26.
45. Elgamal A.W., Zeghal M., Tang H.T., Stepp J.C. Lotung downhole array 1. Evaluation of site dynamic properties. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1995, 121(4):350-362.
46. Lee C.P., Tsai Y.B., Wen K.L. Analysis of nonlinear site response using the LSST downhole accelerometer array data. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26(5):435-460.
47. Salvati L.A., Pestana J.M. Small-strain behavior of granular soils. II: seismic response analyses and model evaluation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2006, 132(8):1082-1090.
48. Borja R., Sun W. Estimating inelastic sediment deformation from local site response simulations. Acta Geotechnica 2007, 2:183-195. 10.1007/s11440-007-0044-x.
49. Reyes D.K., Rodriguez-Marek A., Lizcano A. A hypoplastic model for site response analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29(1):173-184.
50. Tsai C.C., Hashash Y.M.A. Learning of dynamic soil behavior from downhole arrays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2009, 135(6):745-757.