A framework for validation of seismic response analyses using seismometer array recordings

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 512-520

  Bradley, Brendon A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODOLOGY; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; EPISTEMIC UNCERTAINTIES; FORMAL VALIDATION; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND-MOTION VARIABILITY; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOGRAPHS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CONSTITUTIVE MODELS;

CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOGRAPH;

EID: 78650537577     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Japanese Geotechnical Society. Special issue on geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. Soils and foundations 1998.
2. Gates W, Morden M. Lessons from inspection, evaluation, repair and construction. In: Surveys and assessment of damage to buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake, Report SAC 95-06, SAC Joint Venture: Sacramento; 1995.
3. Hanks T.C., Brady A.G. The Loma Prieta earthquake, ground motion, and damage in Oakland, Treasure Island, and San Francisco. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1991, 81(5):2019-2047.
4. Brady A.G. Strong-motion accelerographs: Early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2009, 38(9):1121-1134.
5. National Institute For Earthquake and Disaster Prevention. Kyoshin Network (K-Net) 2010.
6. Kinoshita S. Kyoshin Net (K-NET). Seismological Research Letters 1998, 69(4):309-332.
7. GeoNet. GeoNet, 2010.
8. United States Geological Survey. USGS National strong motion program (NSMP), 2010.
9. Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG, Hirsch C. Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. In: Proceedings of the foundations for verification and validation in the 21st century workshop: Laurel, Maryland, 2002, 74 pp.
10. Pecker A. Validation of small strain properties from recorded weak seismic motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1995, 14(6):399-408.
11. Cubrinovski M, Ishihara K, Furukawazono K. Analysis of two case histories on liquefaction of reclaimed deposits. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
12. Youd T.L., Steidl J.H., Nigbor R.L. Lessons learned and need for instrumented liquefaction sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004, 24(9-10):639-646.
13. Bernardie S., Foerster E., Modaressi H. Non-linear site response simulations in Chang-Hwa region during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26(11):1038-1048.
14. Elgamal A.W., Zeghal M., Parra E., Gunturi R., Tang H.T., Stepp J.C. Identification and modeling of earthquake ground response-I. Site amplification. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1996, 15(8):499-522.
15. Finn W.D.L., Ventura C.E., Wu G. Analysis of ground motions at Treasure Island site during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1993, 12(7):383-390.
16. Kawano M., Asano K., Dohi H., Matsuda S. Verification of predicted non-linear site response during the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2000, 20(5-8):493-507.
17. Lindstrom M.J., Bates D.M. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 1990, 46(3):673-687.
18. Pinheiro J, Bates DM, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Core team. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, 2008.
19. Page M.T., Carlson J.M. Methodologies for earthquake hazard assessment: Model uncertainty and the WGCEP-2002 forecast. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2006, 96(5):1624-1633.
20. Otani S. SAKE, a computer program for inelastic response of R/C frames to earthquakes, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1974.
21. Ibarra L.F., Krawinkler H. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations 2005, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
22. Cubrinovski M., Ishihara K. State concept and modified elastoplasticity for sand modelling. Soils and Foundations 1998, 38(4):213-225.
23. Yang Z., Elgamal A.W., Parra E. Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2003, 129(12):1119-1127.
24. Kulkarni RB, Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ.Assessment of confidence intervals for results of seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering,: San Francisco, CA, 1984, p. 263-70.
25. Bommer J.J., Scherbaum F., Bungum H., Cotton F., Sabetta F., Abrahamson N. On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic hazard assessment. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005, 95(2):377-389.
26. Arulanandan K., Scott R.F. Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems 1993, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
27. Stepp J.C., Wong I., Whitney J., Quittmeyer R., Abrahamson N.A., Toro G.R., et al. Probabilistic seismic hazard analyses for ground motions and fault displacement at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Earthquake Spectra 2001, 17(1):113-151.
28. Bommer J.J., Scherbaum F. The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2008, 24(4):997-1009.
29. Cubrinovski M., Uzuoka R., Sugita H., Tokimatsu K., Sato M., Ishihara K., et al. Prediction of pile response to lateral spreading by 3-D soil-water coupled dynamic analysis: shaking in the direction of ground flow. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(6):421-435.
30. Uzuoka R., Cubrinovski M., Sugita H., Sato M., Tokimatsu K., Sento N., et al. Prediction of pile response to lateral spreading by 3-D soil-water coupled dynamic analysis: shaking in the direction perpendicular to ground flow. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(6):436-452.
31. Schorlemmer D., Gerstenberger M.C. RELM Testing Center. Seismological Research Letters 2007, 78(1):30-36.
32. McGuire R.K. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: early history. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008, 37329-37338.
33. Cornell C.A., Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000, 3(2):1-3.
34. Shome N., Cornell C.A., Bazzurro P., Carballo J.E. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998, 14(3):469-500.
35. Bradley B.A., Cubrinovski M., Dhakal R.P., MacRae G.A. Intensity measures for the seismic response of pile foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29(6):1046-1058.
36. Bradley B.A. A generalised conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground motion selection. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2009, (Published online).