A hypoplastic model for site response analysis

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 173-184

  Reyes, D K ^a   Rodriguez Marek, A ^b   Lizcano, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^b Washington State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Constitutive models; Hypoplasticity; Nonlinear soil behavior; Site response; Visco hypoplasticity

Indexed keywords

ABS RESINS; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; DYNAMIC LOADS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; SOILS;

CYCLIC LOADINGS; DOWNHOLE; DYNAMIC LOADINGS; FINITE ELEMENT CODES; HYPOPLASTICITY; LINEAR APPROACHES; NONLINEAR BEHAVIORS; NONLINEAR MODELS; NONLINEAR SOIL BEHAVIOR; SITE RESPONSE; SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SITE RESPONSES; UNDRAINED CONDITIONS; VISCO-HYPOPLASTICITY;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SITE EFFECT; SOIL MECHANICS; VISCOPLASTICITY;

EID: 54949113319     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Idriss IM, Seed HB. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EERC 70-10. 1970, Berkeley: University of California.
2. Atkinson J.H., Richardson D., and Stallebrass S.E. Effect of recent stress history on the stiffness of over-consolidated soil. Geotechnique 40 4 (1990) 531-540
3. Leinenkugel HJ. Deformation and strength behaviour of cohesive soils, experiments and their physical meaning. Ph.D. dissertation, Publication no. 66, Institute of Soil and Rock Mechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1976.
4. Wichtmann T. Explicit accumulation model for non-cohesive soils under cyclic loading. Ph.D. Dissertation, Publication no. 38, des Institues für Grundbau und Bodenmechanik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 2004.
5. Vucetic M., and Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 117 1 (1991) 89-91
6. Darandeli MB. Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX; 2001.
7. Beresnev I.A., Wen K.-L., and Yeh Y.T. Seismological evidence for nonlinear elastic ground behavior during large earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 14 (1994) 103-114
8. Beresnev I.A., Wen K.-L., and Yeh Y.T. Nonlinear soil amplification: its corroboration in Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85 2 (1995) 496-515
9. Beresnev I.A., Wen K.-L., and Yeh Y.T. Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88 (1998) 1392-1401
10. Cultrera G., Boore D.M., Joyner W.B., and Dietel C.M. Nonlinear soil response in the vicinity of the Van Norman Complex following the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89 (1999) 1214-1231
11. Wen K.L. Nonlinear soil response in ground motions. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 23 6 (1994) 599-608
12. Tsuda K., Archuleta R.J., and Steidl J. Confirmation of nonlinear site response: Case Study from 2003 and 2005 Miyagi-Oki Earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Res Inst Univ Tokio 81 (2006) 303-307
13. Zhang R.R. Characterizing and quantifying earthquake-induced site nonlinearity. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 26 (2006) 799-812
14. Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB. SHAKE-A computer program for equation response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report EERC 72-12, Berkeley: University of California, 1972.
15. Pyke R.M. Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings. J Geotech Eng Div 105 6 (1979) 715-726
16. Ramberg W, Osgood WR. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note 902, NASA, 1943.
17. Duncan J.M., and Chang C.Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress in soil. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 96 (1970) 1629-1653
18. Kolymbas D. A generalized hypoplastic constitutive law. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil mechanics foundations. San Francisco, CA, 1985.
19. Wu W., and Bauer E. A hypoplastic model for barotropy and piknotropy of granular soils. Proceedings of the international workshop on modern approaches to plasticity (1993), Horton, Greece 225-245
20. Bauer E. Calibration of comprehensive hypoplastic model for granular materials. Soils Found 36 1 (1996) 13-26
21. Gudehus G. A comprehensive constitutive equation for granular materials. Soils Found 36 1 (1996) 1-12
22. Wolffersdorff P.A. A hypoplastic relation. Mech Cohesive-Frictional Mater 1 (1997) 251-271
23. Niemunis A., and Herle I. Hypoplastic models for cohesionless soil with elastic strain range. Mech Cohesive-Frictional Mater 2 (1997) 277-299
24. Osinov V.A. Wave induced liquefaction of a saturated sand layer. Continium Mech Thermodyn 12 5 (2000) 325-339
25. Osinov V.A. Numerical model for site response analysis and liquefaction of soil during earthquakes. Proceedings of the international symposium on geotechnical measurements and modelling (2003), Karlsruhe, Germany 475-481
26. Bühler M.M., Cudmani R., Osinov V.A., Libreros-Bertini A.B., and Gudehus G. Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of local site conditions on the ground motion during strong earthquakes. Proceedings of the international symposium on geotechnical measurements and modelling (2003), Karlsruhe, Germany 441-449
27. Borja R.I., and Amies A.P. Multiaxial cyclic plasticity model for clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 120 6 (1994) 1051-1070
28. Borja R.I., Chao H.-Y., Montáns F.J., and Lin C.H. Nonlinear ground response at Lotung LSST Site. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125 3 (1999) 187-197
29. Borja R.I., Lin C.H., Samat K., and Masadat G. Modelling non-linear ground response of non-liqueable soils. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 29 (2000) 63-83
30. Niemunis A. Extended hypoplastic models for soils. Dissertation. Des Institutes für Grundbau und Bodenmechanik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 2003.
31. Butterfiel R. A natural compression law for soils. Geotechnique (1979) 29
32. Hvorslev M. Physical components of the shear strength of saturated clays. In: Shear strength of cohesive soils. Proceedings of ASCE research conference, Boulder, CO, 1960.
33. Reyes DK, Grandas C, Lizcano A. Numerical modelling of wave propagation in Bogotá soft soils. In: Soil stress-strain behavior: measurement, modeling and analysis. A collection of papers of the geotechnical symposium in Rome, volume 146, 2006. p. 779-89.
34. Loukachev L. Dilatanzwellen und Schichttrennung bei Wellenausbreitung in sandigen Böden. Ph.D. dissertation, Publication no. 155, Institute of Soil and Rock Mechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany; 2002.
35. Electric Power Research Institute. Guidelines for determining desing basis ground motions. Report, TR-102293, Palo Alto, CA, 1993.
36. Rodriguez-Marek A. Near-fault seismic site response. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2000.
37. Abaqus. Version 6.5 (2002), Karlsson and Sorensen Inc., Hibbitt
38. Hilbert H., Huges T., and Taylor R. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 5 (1977) 283-292
39. Rodriguez-Marek A., and Bray J. Seismic site response for near fault forward directivity ground motions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132 12 (2006) 1611-1620
40. Hashash Y. Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in non-linear site response analysis. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22 7 (2002) 611-624