A stochastic model for the development of Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities that incorporates protein interaction networks

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 238, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 49-53

  Livingstone, Kevin ^a   Olofsson, Peter ^a   Cochran, Garner ^a   Dagilis, Andrius ^a   MacPherson, Karen ^a   Seitz, Kerry A ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bateson Dobzhansky Muller interactions; Protein protein interaction networks; Reproductive incompatibility; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS; BATESON; EPISTATIC INTERACTIONS; GENERAL MODEL; IN-VIVO; POPULATION GENETIC MODELS; POST-ZYGOTIC BARRIER; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; REPRODUCTIVE INCOMPATIBILITY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION;

ACTIVE NETWORKS; YEAST;

PROTEINS;

EPISTASIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROTEIN; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); STOCHASTICITY;

ALLELE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; IN VIVO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84861573467     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: 18793134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2012.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson J.B., Funt J., Thompson D.A., Prabhu S., Socha A., Sirjusingh C., Dettman J.R., Parreiras L., Guttman D.S., Regev A., Kohn L.M. Determinants of divergent adaptation and Dobzhansky-Muller interaction in experimental yeast populations. Current Biology 2010, 20(15):1383.
2. Bateson W. Heredity and variation in modern lights. Darwin and Modern Science 1909, 85. Cambridge University Press. A.C. Seward (Ed.).
3. Bikard D., Patel D., Le Metté C., Giorgi V., Camilleri C., Bennett M.J., Loudet O. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 2009, 323(5914):623.
4. Cabot E.L., Davis A.W., Johnson N.A., Wu C.-I. Genetics of reproductive isolation in the drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility. Genetics 1994, 137:175.
5. Dobzhansky T. Genetic nature of species differences. American Naturalist 1937, 71(735):404.
6. Fierst J.L., Hansen T.F. Genetic architecture and postzygotic reproductive isolation: Evolution of Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a polygenic model. Evolution 2010, 64(3):675.
7. Fitzpatrick B.M. Hybrid dysfunction: population genetic and quantitative genetic perspectives. American Naturalist 2008, 171(4):491.
8. Gavrilets S. Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution 2003, 57(10):2197.
9. Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species Sergey Gavrilets. Monographs in population biology 2004, 41. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Jeong H., Mason S.P., Barabási A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411(6833):41.
11. Kao K.C., Schwartz K., Sherlock G. A genome-wide analysis reveals no nuclear Dobzhansky-Muller pairs of determinants of speciation between S. cerevisiae S. paradoxus but suggests more complex incompatibilities. PLoS Genetics 2010, 6(7):e1001038.
12. Kondrashov A.S. Accumulation of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities within a spatially structured population. Evolution 2003, 57(1):151.
13. Matute D.R., Butler I.a., Turissini D.a., Coyne J.a. A test of the snowball theory for the rate of evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Science 2010, 329(5998):1518.
14. Mizuta Y., Harushima Y., Kurata N. Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010, 107(47):20417.
15. Moyle L.C., Nakazato T. Hybrid incompatibility snowballs between Solanum species. Science 2010, 329(5998):1521.
16. Muller H.J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biological Symposia 1942, 6:71-125.
17. Orr H.A. The genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 1995, 139(1):1805.
18. Orr H.a., Irving S. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA Hybridization. Genetics 2001, 158(3):1089.
19. Orr H.a., Turelli M. The evolution of Postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 2001, 55(6):1085.
20. Palmer M.E., Feldman M.W. Dynamics of hybrid incompatibility in gene networks in a constant environment. Evolution 2009, 63(2):418.
21. Presgraves D.C. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nature Reviews Genetics 2010, 11(3):175.
22. Rieseberg L.H., Blackman B.K. Speciation genes in plants. Annals of Botany 2010, 106(3):439.
23. Rives A.W., Galitski T. Modular organization of cellular networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2003, 100(3):1128.
24. Sepkoski J.J. Rates of speciation in the fossil record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 1998, 353(1366):315.
25. Stark C., Breitkreutz B.-J., Reguly T., Boucher L., Breitkreutz A., Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Research 2006, 34(Database issue):D535.
26. Turelli M., Orr H.a. Dominance,epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 2000, 154(4):1663.
27. Wagner A. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2001, 18(7):1283.
28. Welch J.J. Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities: reconciling theory and data. Evolution 2004, 58(6):1145.